| Literature DB >> 31403241 |
Cynthia S M Kramer1, Marry E I Franke-van Dijk1, Ashley J Priddey2, Tamás Pongrácz3, Elena Gnudi1, Helena Car1, Gonca E Karahan1, Els van Beelen1, Chalana C C Zilvold-van den Oever4, Hendrik J Rademaker4, Noortje de Haan3, Manfred Wuhrer3, Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis2, Paul W H I Parren1,5, Arend Mulder1, Dave L Roelen1, Frans H J Claas1, Sebastiaan Heidt1.
Abstract
In the field of transplantation, the humoural immune response against mismatched HLA antigens of the donor is associated with inferior graft survival, but not in every patient. Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) of different immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses may have differential effects on the transplanted organ. Recombinant technology allows for the generation of IgG subclasses of a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), while retaining its epitope specificity. In order to enable studies on the biological function of IgG subclass HLA antibodies, we used recombinant technology to generate recombinant human HLA mAbs from established heterohybridomas. We generated all four IgG subclasses of a human HLA class I and class II mAb and showed that the different subclasses had a comparable affinity, normal human Fc glycosylation, and retained HLA epitope specificity. For both mAbs, the IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes were capable of binding complement component 3d (C3d) and efficient in complement-dependent cell lysis against their specific targets, while the IgG2 and IgG4 subclasses were not able to induce cytotoxicity. Considering the fact that the antibody-binding site and properties remained unaffected, these IgG subclass HLA mAbs are excellent tools to study the function of individual IgG subclass HLA class I and class II-specific antibodies in a controlled fashion.Entities:
Keywords: IgG subclass; affinity; glycosylation; human leukocyte antigen; monoclonal antibody; transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31403241 PMCID: PMC6851673 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HLA ISSN: 2059-2302 Impact factor: 4.513
Figure 1Recombinant IgG subclass HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could be detected by the corresponding IgG‐specific detection antibody. IgG subclass could be detected with IgG subclass enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for both WIM8E5rec‐IgG mAbs (A) and RLTK1E2rec‐IgG mAbs (B). Positive control is a human serum. (C) Similar findings were observed when screening recombinant WIM8E5 IgG subclass mAbs with Lifecodes Lifescreen Deluxe kit. The kit contains seven groups of HLA class I beads and each data point represents a single bead group. Kruskal‐Wallis test was used to compare median of all four detection antibodies per IgG subclass mAb. Error bars represent median ± interquartile range. MFI is mean fluorescence intensity. OD is optical density. ***P < .001, ****P < .0001
Figure 2The same HLA epitope is recognised by the recombinant IgG subclass HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). HLA specificities of recombinant IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 of WIM8E5 mAb (A) and RTLK1E2 mAb (B, only DRB1/3/4/5 beads are shown as all other loci were negative) as detected by Luminex SAB assay. Purified recombinant mAb concentration tested was 62.5 nM. BCM is background corrected mean fluorescence intensity
Figure 3Recombinant IgG subclass HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have similar affinity. The affinity (A) and dissociation rates (B) of recombinant IgG subclass WIM8E5 mAbs were determined via bio‐layer interferometry. Calculated values are consistently similar across all IgG subclasses against the target HLA‐A*11:01. The dotted lines represent the affinity (A) and dissociation constant (B) average across all four IgG subclasses. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three experiments
Figure 4The glycosylation profile of recombinant IgG subclass HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is similar. Relative intensity values of derived traits for the recombinant IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 of WIM8E5 mAb (A) and RLTK1E2 mAbs (B) are shown
Figure 5Recombinant IgG1 and IgG3 HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are cytotoxic. (A) Recombinant IgG subclass WIM8E5 mAbs were incubated with PBMC expressing HLA‐A1, ‐A11, ‐B8, ‐B55, ‐Cw3, and ‐Cw7. WIM8E5rec‐IgG1 and ‐IgG3 induced cell lysis (>60%), while IgG2 and IgG4 were unable to induce complement cytotoxicity. (B) Recombinant IgG subclass RTLK1E2 mAbs were incubated with B cells expressing HLA‐DR17, ‐DR13, and ‐DR52. RTLK1E2rec‐IgG1 (>80%) and ‐IgG3 (>60%) induced cell lysis, while no cell lysis was observed for RLTK1E2rec‐IgG2 and RTKL1E2rec‐IgG4. mAbs were added in various concentrations (1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, and 15.62 nM). Error bars represent the mean ± SD of triplicate wells. The Kruskal‐Wallis test was used per dilution to compare the IgG subclass HLA mAbs. Dotted line indicates background. ****P < .0001 ***P < .001, **P < .01, *P < .05