Literature DB >> 31403074

Fine-Tuning the Pore Environment of the Microporous Cu-MOF for High Propylene Storage and Efficient Separation of Light Hydrocarbons.

Weidong Fan1, Xia Wang1, Xiurong Zhang1, Xiuping Liu1, Yutong Wang1, Zixi Kang1, Fangna Dai1, Ben Xu1, Rongming Wang1, Daofeng Sun1.   

Abstract

Ethylene (C2H4) and propylene (C3H6) are important energy sources and raw materials in the chemical industry. Storage and separation of C2H4 and C3H6 are vital to their practical application. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) having adjustable structures and pore environments are promising candidates for C3H6/C2H4 separation. Herein, we obtained a Cu-based MOF synthesized by H3TTCA and pyrazine ligands. By adding different functional groups on the ligands within the MOFs, their pore environments are adjusted, and thus, the C3H6 storage capacity and C3H6/C2H4 separation efficiency are improved. Eventually, the fluoro- and methyl-functionalized iso-MOF-4 exhibits a better gas storage and C3H6/C2H4 separation performance compared with iso-MOF-1 (nonfunctionalized), iso-MOF-2 (fluoro-functionalized), and iso-MOF-3 (methyl-functionalized). A record-high C3H6 uptake of 293.6 ± 2.3 cm3 g-1 (273 K, 1 atm) is achieved using iso-MOF-4. Moreover, iso-MOF-4 shows excellent repeatability, and only 3.5% of C3H6 storage capacities decrease after nine cycles. Employing Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, it is indicated that iso-MOF-4 preferentially adsorbs C3H6 rather than C2H4 at low pressure. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction on C3H6-adsorbed iso-MOF-4 crystals precisely demonstrates the adsorption positions and arrangement of C3H6 molecules in the framework, which is consistent with the theoretical simulations. Remarkably, gas sorption isotherms, molecular simulations, and breakthrough experiments comprehensively demonstrate that this unique MOF material exhibits highly efficient C3H6/C2H4 separation. Additionally, iso-MOF-4 also possesses efficient separation of C3H8/CH4 and C2H6/CH4, indicating its promising potential in storage/separation of light hydrocarbons in industry.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31403074      PMCID: PMC6661871          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Ethylene (C2H4) and propylene (C3H6) are important raw materials for the synthesis of polyethylene and polypropylene.[1−4] The coal-to-olefins processes, include methanol-to-olefins (MTO) and methanol-to-propylene (MTP), are the most advanced strategies to produce C2H4 and C3H6: the products of the MTO process contain C2H4 of 51.1 wt % and C3H6 of 20.91 wt %, and the MTP process mainly produces C3H6 of 71 wt %.[5,6] However, the high quality and purity of C2H4 and C3H6 are essential to their industrial applications.[7−10] For example, producing ethylbenzene requires a high purity of C2H4 with a volume fraction of C3H6 less than 0.15%.[11,12] The traditional separation process of the C2H4 and C3H6 mixture is cryogenic distillation based on different vapor pressures, which has a high energy consumption.[11] The separation method of the MTO and MTP product is alkaline washing, which will produce a large amount of butter and affect the safety of the equipment. Compared with the cryogenic distillation and alkaline washing technologies, adsorptive separation is safer and more energy-efficient.[13,14] Thus, preparing porous materials exhibiting highly selective adsorption of C3H6 is of significance to realize the safe and high-capacity storage of C3H6 and efficient separation of C3H6/C2H4.[15−20] Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as a new type of promising adsorbents, have been widely investigated in storage and gas separation, such as H2, O2, CH4, CO2, etc.[21−23] The prominent advantages of MOFs over the traditional porous materials, such as activated carbon and zeolites, are their high surface areas and adjustable pores.[24−26] MOFs have been recently researched in light hydrocarbons storage and separation.[27−29] For example, to effectively improve C3H6 and C3H8 storage capacity at room temperature, Cao et al. explored microporous anionic MOFs with different porosities and concluded that the narrow pore size, the charged skeleton, and cationic counterions are beneficial to enhance the storage capacity of C3H6 and C3H8.[30] Chen et al. reported a series of MOFs with optimized pore/cage sizes and open metal sites for adsorption/separation of light hydrocarbons.[25,31,32] To date, most of the reported works are mainly focused on the separation of C2 or C3 hydrocarbons from methane (C1). However, functional MOFs that exhibit efficient separation of C3/C2 light hydrocarbons, especially C3H6/C2H4 separation, are seldom reported, although this type of MOF is practically favorable. In this contribution, selecting iso-MOF-1 as the parent framework,[33] we obtained a family of isostructural microporous copper MOFs through adding the functional organic ligands, and the pore environments were therefore optimized for higher C3H6 storage and C3H6/C2H4 separation. Due to the existence of multiple channels in the structure, the obtained frameworks have a strong affinity for hydrocarbons, which is beneficial to the hydrocarbons storage and separation.[34,35] On the other hand, iso-MOFs possess high thermal stability, suitable pore spaces with rich benzene/pyrazine rings, multipore environments, and moderately high porosities with open metal sites, which is ideal for light hydrocarbon storage and separation. Gas adsorption and breakthrough measurements reveal that the fluoro- and methyl-functionalized iso-MOF-4 exhibits ultrahigh propylene storage (293.6 ± 2.3 cm3 g–1 at 273 K and 1 atm) and excellent separation performances for C3H6/C2H4. It also presents moderate C3H8/CH4 and C2H6/CH4 separation efficiencies. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations were performed to investigate the adsorption mechanisms of C3H6 and C2H4 within iso-MOF-4, and the results show that iso-MOF-4 preferentially adsorbs C3H6 rather than C2H4 at low pressure. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction on the C3H6-adsorbed crystal of iso-MOF-4 was also employed to further demonstrate the precise locations and arrangements of the adsorped C3H6 molecules within the frameworks. These unique storage and separation performances make iso-MOF-4 a promising candidate for practical applications in industry for C3H6 storage and C3H6/C2H4 separation.

Results and Discussion

Fine-Tuning of Pore Environment in the Crystal Structure

Dark green crystals of iso-MOF-1 were obtained by the solvothermal reaction of H3TTCA ([1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl]-4,4″,5′-tricarboxylic acid), pyrazine, and Cu(NO3)2·3H2O in DMF/H2O (v/v, 3/1) at 75 °C for 12 h. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction reveals that there are three types of 1D channels in iso-MOF-1, as illustrated in Figure S1, which are the tetragonal shaped channel (I) with dimensions of 7.1 × 6.4 Å2, the pentagonal channel (II) with dimensions of 14.8 × 10.2 Å2, and the hexagonal channel (III) with dimensions of 17.2 × 12.7 Å2 (Figure S1c,d), respectively, providing an ideal platform for light hydrocarbon storage and separation. Functional groups (F, Cl, NH2, CH3, OCH3) were introduced in the MOFs (Figure ) to further improve the C3H6 and C3H8 storage. The above MOFs crystals were obtained by a one-pot reaction rather than postsynthesis modification. Taking the fluorinated ligand (H3TTCA-F) and 2-methylpyrazine ligand as example, iso-MOF-2 can be isolated by substituting the H3TTCA ligand with the H3TTCA-F ligand, and iso-MOF-3 can be obtained by substituting 2-methylpyrazine for pyrazine. The H3TTCA-F ligand and 2-methylpyrazine are simultaneously constructed into the same structure to obtain iso-MOF-4, realizing the multifunctional modification of the MOF pore environment.
Figure 1

Fine-tuning of pore environment through multifunctionalized ligand modification in an isoreticular MOF framework, coordination state of Cu2(COO)4 SBU, and coordination modes of TTCA3–-R.

Fine-tuning of pore environment through multifunctionalized ligand modification in an isoreticular MOF framework, coordination state of Cu2(COO)4 SBU, and coordination modes of TTCA3–-R.

Gas Sorption

iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4 are stable up to 250 °C, as confirmed by variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD ;Figure S3), which is consistent with TGA (Figure S8). The high thermal stability and porosity of the iso-MOFs prompt us to study their gas adsorption performances. The iso-MOF crystals were solvent-exchanged with dry acetone. The acetone-exchanged samples were degassed at 298 K for 12 h and then at 353 K for 10 h, until the outgas rate was 5 mmHg min–1, to produce the activated iso-MOFs. The active phase is highly crystalline and remains almost the same as its as-synthesized phase (Figure S3). The N2 gas sorption curves of the iso-MOFs at 77 K indicate their permanent porosities (Figure a). All iso-MOFs show a typical type I N2 adsorption isotherm with Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 3211 m2 g–1 for iso-MOF-1, 3154 m2 g–1 for iso-MOF-2, 3067 m2 g–1 for iso-MOF-3, and 2925 m2 g–1 for iso-MOF-4, suggesting their permanent microporosities. Pore size distributions were determined applying the nonlocal DFT (NLDFT) calculations based on the N2 adsorption isotherms. All iso-MOFs have the pore sizes of 12.0–13.0 and 20.5–21.5 Å, consistent with their crystallographic data.
Figure 2

(a) N2 sorption isotherms and pore size distribution for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4 at 77 K. (b) C3H6 and C2H4 sorption isotherms at 298 K for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4. (c) C3H6/C2H4 selectivity at 298 K for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4, calculated by the IAST method (v/v: 50/50). (d) C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption isotherms of iso-MOF-4 at 273, 298, and 303 K. (e, f) Cycles of C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption for iso-MOF-4 at 298 K.

(a) N2 sorption isotherms and pore size distribution for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4 at 77 K. (b) C3H6 and C2H4 sorption isotherms at 298 K for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4. (c) C3H6/C2H4 selectivity at 298 K for iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4, calculated by the IAST method (v/v: 50/50). (d) C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption isotherms of iso-MOF-4 at 273, 298, and 303 K. (e, f) Cycles of C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption for iso-MOF-4 at 298 K. Considering the permanent porosity and large cages with open metal sites in all iso-MOFs, low-pressure C3H6 and C3H8 uptakes were further measured under 1 atm (Figure b and Tables S4 and S5). As expected, the fluoro- and methyl-functionalized iso-MOF-4 exhibit the highest C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption amounts up to 293.6 and 268.6 cm3 g–1 at 273 K, which are higher than 245.5 and 229.5 cm3 g–1 for iso-MOF-1, 290.0 and 267.9 cm3 g–1 for iso-MOF-2, and 269.1 and 250.4 cm3 g–1 for iso-MOF-3. In addition, the adsorption amounts of C3H6 and C3H8 in iso-MOF-4 are record-high in the reported MOF materials (Tables S4 and S5). To examine the cycling stability, as well as the error bars, nine cycles of C3H6 adsorption–desorption at 273 K were recorded with the reactivation process for each cycle. The C3H6 adsorption capacity of iso-MOF-4 is 293.6 ± 2.3 cm3 g–1 (Figure S12b). In practice, C3H6 and C3H8 gases are usually stored at ambient temperature, and the C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption experiments at room temperature (298 K) were carried out. Exhilaratingly, iso-MOF-4 exhibits adsorption amounts of 254.5 and 240.9 cm3 g–1 for C3H6 and C3H8, respectively, which is dramatically higher than the previously reported UPC-21 (116.2 and 124.1 cm3 g–1),[29] FJI-C1 (160.9 cm3 g–1 for C3H8), and FJI-C4 (74.7 cm3 g–1 for C3H8).[30] Remarkably, the C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption amounts of 231.7 and 219.0 cm3 g–1 can still be achieved at a higher temperature of 305 K (Figure d). The C3H6 and C3H8 uptake capacity of iso-MOF-4 only decreased by a rate of 2.01 and 1.65 cm3 g–1 K–1, respectively, from 273 to 305 K. Therefore, iso-MOF-4 is more suitable for practical applications around room temperature. In consideration of its practical application, we also tested the repeatability of iso-MOF-4 for C3H6 and C3H8 storage. About 100 mg of desolvated sample was loaded onto an ASAP 2020 analyzer, and nine cycles of C3H6 and C3H8 adsorption–desorption at 298 K were recorded without the reactivation process for each cycle. There is only 3.5% and 2.8% loss in adsorption capacity of C3H6 and C3H8 after nine cycles, indicating that iso-MOF-4 is promising in refillable C3H6 and C3H8 storage (Figure e,f). To further check its adsorption capacity for other light hydrocarbons, single component gas sorption isotherms of iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, iso-MOF-3, and iso-MOF-4 for CH4, C2H2, C2H4, and C2H6 were performed at both 273 and 298 K. iso-MOF-4 also exhibits a high adsorption capacity, which can take up moderate amounts of C2H2 (161.7 cm3 g–1), C2H4 (131.8 cm3 g–1), C2H6 (185.6 cm3 g–1), and CH4 (17.9 cm3 g–1) at 273 K; C2H2 (91.5 cm3 g–1), C2H4 (73.1 cm3 g–1), and C2H6 (114.0 cm3 g–1), but a relatively lower amount of CH4 (13.4 cm3 g–1) at 298 K (Figure S9). It should be noted that the sorption capacity of iso-MOF-4 for C2H4 (73.1 cm3 g–1) at 298 K is higher than UTSA-30a (46 cm3 g–1)[36] and UTSA-36a (45 cm3 g–1),[37] and even comparable to UTSA-38a (70 cm3 g–1).[38] It is well-known that the magnitude of the adsorption enthalpies of porous materials reveals the affinity of the pore surface toward adsorbents, determining the adsorptive selectivity.[39] To evaluate the affinity of such light hydrocarbons in iso-MOFs, the adsorption enthalpy (Qst) for different light hydrocarbons was calculated by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation. The Qst values of CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, and C3H8 in iso-MOF-4 are 14.0, 27.8, 25.4, 18.7, 30.9, and 28.0 kJ mol–1 at zero coverage, respectively (Figure S10), which are higher than iso-MOF-1, iso-MOF-2, and iso-MOF-3 for the corresponding gas molecule, indicating that the framework of iso-MOF-4 possesses a higher affinity to C3H6 and C3H8 molecules.

GCMC Simulations

Theoretically, the determination of gas adsorption sites in the MOF framework is of great significance for the design of new gas storage and separation materials based on MOFs.[40,41] Herein, the ultrahigh C3H6 storage capacity prompts us to explore the adsorption sites within the framework of iso-MOF-4. Theoretical simulation is a powerful tool enabling us to unveil the adsorption mechanisms and providing us the information on adsorption sites. Hence, GCMC simulations were performed for understanding the interactions and adsorption behaviors of C3H6 in iso-MOF-4 at the molecular level.[35,42,43] The density distributions of C3H6 and C2H4 molecules mass center within the structure at 298 K under different pressures were analyzed (Figure a–f). As expected, the potential adsorption sites are located around the paddlewheel secondary building units (SBUs). At relatively low pressure, the C3H6 molecules in iso-MOF-4 are preferentially filled in the tetragon I, surrounded by four benzene rings and one pyrazine ring, and pentagon II regions, surrounded by six benzene rings and one pyrazine ring. It is noteworthy that the adsorption behaviors of C3H6 in I and II regions are due to the interactions between the guest molecules and the surrounding benzene and pyrazine rings. Therefore, the ultrahigh C3H6 uptake of iso-MOF-4 is related to the rich benzene and pyrazine rings, suitable pore space, and open metal sites. With the increases of pressure (from 0.5 to 1.5 kPa), I and II regions are saturated; hexagon III regions begin to fill. In contrast, although C2H4 molecules have the same filling tendency, the filling pressure (from 10 to 60 kPa) is significantly greater than that of C3H6. This is consistent with the experimental data that the C3H6 adsorption isotherm was much steeper at low pressure than those for C2H4 and other C1–C2 light hydrocarbons. Moreover, the filling tendency is attributed to the tetragon I and pentagon II being able to produce stronger van der Waals interactions due to their smaller diameters,[44] and therefore, C3H6 prefers filling the tetragon I and pentagon II regions rather than the hexagon III.
Figure 3

Density distribution of C3H6 and C2H4 molecule mass center within iso-MOF-4 at 298 K under different pressures: (a) 10 kPa, (b) 30 kPa, and (c) 60 kPa for C2H4; (d) 0.5 kPa, (e) 1 kPa, and (f) 1.5 kPa for C3H6. C3H6 molecules loaded structure: (g, h) preferential binding sites for C3H6 molecules within the iso-MOF-4 framework, highlighted C–H···C (aromatic rings) and C–H···F interactions in pink dashed bonds. (i) Precise location of C3H6 in the tetragon I, pentagon II, and hexagon III regions.

Density distribution of C3H6 and C2H4 molecule mass center within iso-MOF-4 at 298 K under different pressures: (a) 10 kPa, (b) 30 kPa, and (c) 60 kPa for C2H4; (d) 0.5 kPa, (e) 1 kPa, and (f) 1.5 kPa for C3H6. C3H6 molecules loaded structure: (g, h) preferential binding sites for C3H6 molecules within the iso-MOF-4 framework, highlighted C–H···C (aromatic rings) and C–H···F interactions in pink dashed bonds. (i) Precise location of C3H6 in the tetragon I, pentagon II, and hexagon III regions.

Crystal Structure of C3H6@iso-MOF-4

The most intuitive way to determine the adsorption of the C3H6 molecule is single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), which can provide precise information about the location and orientation of the adsorbed molecules. However, the accurate crystallographic location of gas molecules in an MOF is challenging, unless the gas molecules have a strong affinity to the framework of the MOF. Recently, Li et al. precisely described the locations and orientations of adsorbed molecules (carbon number (n): 2–4) in a microporous MOF by SCXRD and molecular simulations, providing useful information for the design and synthesis of MOFs with light hydrocarbon storage and separation functions.[45] Considering that iso-MOF-4 exhibits ultrahigh C3H6 storage and high adsorption enthalpy (Qst) for C3H6 molecules, the accurate determination of the sorption sites in activated iso-MOF-4 through SCXRD was carried out. The C3H6-loaded single crystal of iso-MOF-4 was rapidly coated with Paratone oil.[45] The resulting C3H6-loaded single-crystal sample can be determined with a conventional X-ray diffractometer at 100 K. The activated iso-MOF-4 with C3H6 has the same space group as as-synthesized iso-MOF-4 (I41/amd). However, the coordinated water molecules always remain on the paddlewheel SBUs because the operation was under the ambient atmosphere, and water molecules immediately coordinated to the open copper site. The single-crystal X-ray structures for iso-MOF-4·2.0C3H6 evidently reveal that the adsorbed C3H6 molecules can be accommodated in the channels along a and b axes. One refined C3H6 molecule (with 0.5 occupancy) forms C–H···F interactions (H···F distances of 3.30 Å) with the fluorine atom (F1) of the TTCA-F ligand (Figure g). The other C3H6 molecules are surrounded by benzene rings and a pyrazine ring with a strong C–H···π interaction (Figure g,h). From the packing of C3H6 molecules viewed along the crystallographic a axis, one C3H6 molecule filled in the tetragon I, five C3H6 molecules in the pentagon II regions, and four C3H6 molecules in the hexagon III (Figure i). As expected, the adsorption sites and arrangements of C3H6 adsorbed in iso-MOF-4 crystals revealed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction are in good agreement with the theoretical calculation.

Ideal Absorbed Solution Theory (IAST) Selectivities

The C3H6/C2H4 separation of iso-MOFs was investigated due to its great significance in industrial applications. On the basis of previous reports, the adsorption of C3H6 and C2H4 in adsorbents directly influences the separation efficiency. Obviously, the adsorption rates of C3H6 and C3H8 are much higher than those of C1 and C2 at low pressure in iso-MOFs, and the adsorption enthalpy of C3 light hydrocarbons is the highest, indicating that they may provide stronger affinity to the framework and preferentially adsorbed on the framework of all iso-MOFs. For example, the adsorption energies of one C3H6 molecule on the pyrazine site, Cu site, F site, and benzene ring site in iso-MOF-4 are −47.37, −35.1, −25.9, and −24.09 kJ mol–1, higher than the adsorption energies of the C2H4 molecule (−38.42, −29.1, −18.4, and −15.62 kJ mol–1 for corresponding sites) (Figure S21). Therefore, it may show the high selectivity of C3 light hydrocarbons relative to C1 and C2.

Breakthrough Experiments

To evaluate the C3H6/C2H4 separation performances of iso-MOF-4 in practical adsorption processes, experimental breakthrough studies were conducted, in which equimolar C3H6/C2H4 gas mixtures were flowed over a packed column of activated iso-MOF-4 with a total flow of 2.67 mL min–1 at 298 K. As shown in Figure a, highly efficient separations of C3H6/C2H4 are achieved: C2H4 can be first detected from the outlet effluent gas during initial purges, exhibiting an acceptable purity of over 99.99%, while no detectable C3H6 was found. When the dynamic mixture flow is 120 min g–1, the adsorbent reached saturation. At this time, C3H6 achieved its breakthrough point, and the corresponding C2H4 productivity is 14.30 mol kg–1 sorbent, which is significantly higher than other top-performing C2H4-selective MOFs, such as SIFSIX-1-Cu[44] (6.37 mol kg–1), SIFSIX-2-Cu-I[44] (2.88 mol kg–1), SIFSIX-3-Zn[44] (1.52 mol kg–1), UTSA-280[46] (1.86 mol kg–1), MAF-49[47] (1.68 mol kg–1), and Fe2(O2)(dobdc)[1] (0.79 mol kg–1), but trails UTSA-200a[48] (87.5 mol kg–1). Obviously, the desirable high-purity C2H4 can be directly obtained in a single separating operation by using C3H6-selective adsorbents, which greatly simplifies the separation process of these important petrochemicals. In practical industrial applications, the recyclability of an ideal absorbent is a problem worth considering. Therefore, we conducted multiple C3H6/C2H4 mixed-gas dynamic breakthrough experiments to evaluate the preservation of iso-MOF-4 separation performance. The recycling tests indicated that the C2H4 productivity of the sorbent did not significantly reduce during five breakthrough experiments (Figure b), further exhibiting that iso-MOF-4 is a promising candidate for C3H6/C2H4 mixture purification.
Figure 4

(a) Experimental column breakthrough curves for the C3H6/C2H4 (v/v, 50/50) mixture (298 K, 1 atm) under a flow of 2.67 mL min–1 in an absorber bed packed with iso-MOF-4. (b) Recyclability of C2H4 capacity on iso-MOF-4 after C3H6/C2H4 (v/v, 50/50) breakthrough tests; each separation process was carried out at 298 K and 1 atm, while regeneration was performed using He flow (100 mL min–1) at 353 K for 30 min. (c, d) Experimental column breakthrough curves for the C3H8/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) and C2H6/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) mixture (298 K, 1 atm) under a flow of 4.0 mL min–1 in an absorber bed packed with iso-MOF-4.

(a) Experimental column breakthrough curves for the C3H6/C2H4 (v/v, 50/50) mixture (298 K, 1 atm) under a flow of 2.67 mL min–1 in an absorber bed packed with iso-MOF-4. (b) Recyclability of C2H4 capacity on iso-MOF-4 after C3H6/C2H4 (v/v, 50/50) breakthrough tests; each separation process was carried out at 298 K and 1 atm, while regeneration was performed using He flow (100 mL min–1) at 353 K for 30 min. (c, d) Experimental column breakthrough curves for the C3H8/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) and C2H6/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) mixture (298 K, 1 atm) under a flow of 4.0 mL min–1 in an absorber bed packed with iso-MOF-4. The C2H6/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) and C3H8/CH4 (v/v, 15/85) separations were also measured by breakthrough experiments, and C2H6 and C3H8 were efficiently removed from CH4 in the fixed bed to yield a high-purity gas (Figure c,d). The purity of CH4 monitored at the outlet is over 99.999%. Notably, the breakthrough time of C3H8/CH4 is 113 min g–1, which is comparable to C3H6/C2H4 and higher than C2H6/CH4 (elution times is 25 min g–1), suggesting the high C3 capture capacities for iso-MOF-4 to these mixtures. The separation of C3/C2/C1 hydrocarbons is the most important but challenging process in industry, which is currently energy- and cost-intensive.[49−51] Although adsorption-based porous materials are expected to create cost-effective and energy-efficient separation technologies, there is a trade-off between adsorption capacity and selectivity of porous materials reported so far.[3,27,31,52] We have demonstrated that iso-MOF-4 affords the selective molecular exclusion of C1 and C2 hydrocarbons and a record-high amount of C3 hydrocarbons adsorption; thus, iso-MOF-4 has the potential to overcome the trade-off effect for achieving a highly efficient separation of the mixture of C1/C2 and C3 hydrocarbons. The high C3H6 storage and efficient C3H6/C2H4 separation, as well as moderate C2H6/CH4 and C3H8/CH4 separations, make iso-MOF-4 extremely applicable to the emergent separation requirements in many industrial processes. For instance, methanol-to-olefins (MTO) products contain about 90% C2–C4 light-olefins, and there is an urgent need for an effective method to extract the main product C2H4.[3] The separation of Fischer–Tropsch-to-olefins (FTO) products or natural gas purification also have similar requirements with the high selectivity of C3/CH4.[53] These issues are currently underway in our lab.

Safety Statement

No unexpected or unusually high safety hazards were encountered.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we describe a family of isostructural microporous copper MOFs based on iso-MOF-1 through adding functional organic ligands, and the pore environments are properly adjusted for high light hydrocarbon storage and separation. The fluoro- and methyl-functionalized iso-MOF-4 exhibits the best gas storage and separation performance. GCMC simulations show that iso-MOF-4 preferentially adsorbs C3H6 rather than C2H4 at low pressure. The C3H6 adsorption sites in iso-MOF-4 are precisely determined by SCXRD and molecular simulations to demonstrate the remarkable adsorption capacity. Breakthrough experiments reveal that iso-MOF-4 exhibits excellent separation performances for C3H6/C2H4, C2H6/CH4, and C3H8/CH4, indicating that iso-MOF-4 is a promising candidate for these very important industrial applications. On the basis of the modified performance of MOFs directly designed, we are currently developing customizable adsorbents for specific gas separations such as C2H2/C2H4, C3H6/C3H8, etc.
  35 in total

1.  Metal-organic frameworks with functional pores for recognition of small molecules.

Authors:  Banglin Chen; Shengchang Xiang; Guodong Qian
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  A Zn4O-containing doubly interpenetrated porous metal-organic framework for photocatalytic decomposition of methyl orange.

Authors:  Madhab C Das; Hui Xu; Zhiyu Wang; Gadipelli Srinivas; Wei Zhou; Yan-Feng Yue; Vladimir N Nesterov; Guodong Qian; Banglin Chen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Metastable sorption state of a metal-organic porous material determined by in situ synchrotron powder diffraction.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kubota; Masaki Takata; Ryotaro Matsuda; Ryo Kitaura; Susumu Kitagawa; Tatsuo C Kobayashi
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene.

Authors:  Felix Studt; Frank Abild-Pedersen; Thomas Bligaard; Rasmus Z Sørensen; Claus H Christensen; Jens K Nørskov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A new approach to construct a doubly interpenetrated microporous metal-organic framework of primitive cubic net for highly selective sorption of small hydrocarbon molecules.

Authors:  Madhab C Das; Hui Xu; Shengchang Xiang; Zhangjing Zhang; Hadi D Arman; Guodong Qian; Banglin Chen
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  A microporous lanthanide-tricarboxylate framework with the potential for purification of natural gas.

Authors:  Yabing He; Shengchang Xiang; Zhangjing Zhang; Shunshun Xiong; Frank R Fronczek; Rajamani Krishna; Michael O'Keeffe; Banglin Chen
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Highly controlled acetylene accommodation in a metal-organic microporous material.

Authors:  Ryotaro Matsuda; Ryo Kitaura; Susumu Kitagawa; Yoshiki Kubota; Rodion V Belosludov; Tatsuo C Kobayashi; Hirotoshi Sakamoto; Takashi Chiba; Masaki Takata; Yoshiyuki Kawazoe; Yoshimi Mita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  New microporous materials for acetylene storage and C(2)H(2)/CO(2) separation: insights from molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael Fischer; Frank Hoffmann; Michael Fröba
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Hydrocarbon separations in a metal-organic framework with open iron(II) coordination sites.

Authors:  Eric D Bloch; Wendy L Queen; Rajamani Krishna; Joseph M Zadrozny; Craig M Brown; Jeffrey R Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Porous materials with pre-designed single-molecule traps for CO₂ selective adsorption.

Authors:  Jian-Rong Li; Jiamei Yu; Weigang Lu; Lin-Bing Sun; Julian Sculley; Perla B Balbuena; Hong-Cai Zhou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Molecularly Imprinted Porous Aromatic Frameworks for Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Ye Yuan; Yajie Yang; Guangshan Zhu
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 14.553

2.  A robust Th-azole framework for highly efficient purification of C2H4 from a C2H4/C2H2/C2H6 mixture.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xu; Xiaohong Xiong; Jianbo Xiong; Rajamani Krishna; Libo Li; Yaling Fan; Feng Luo; Banglin Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Tandem Reactions over Zeolite-Based Catalysts in Syngas Conversion.

Authors:  Cederick Cyril Amoo; Chuang Xing; Noritatsu Tsubaki; Jian Sun
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 18.728

4.  Minute/instant-MOFs: versatile, high quality, ultrafast, scalable production at room temperature.

Authors:  Vijayan Srinivasapriyan
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2019-08-02

5.  Reticular Chemistry in All Dimensions.

Authors:  Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.