| Literature DB >> 31402955 |
Melissa Marie Radspieler1, Mario Schindeldecker1,2, Philipp Stenzel1, Sebastian Försch1, Katrin E Tagscherer1, Esther Herpel3,4, Markus Hohenfellner5, Gencay Hatiboglu5, Wilfried Roth1, Stephan Macher-Goeppinger1,2.
Abstract
Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a von-Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL) associated tumor disease. In addition to activating the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) dependent oxygen-sensing pathway, VHL loss also has an impact on a HIF-independent senescence program which functions as a tumorigenesis barrier. Lamin-B1 is a nuclear intermediate filament protein that exhibits effects on chromatin structure and gene expression and acts as a senescence effector. In the present study, the expression and prognostic relevance of Lamin-B1 in a large cohort of ccRCC patients was examined and the report presents initial functional data on possible therapeutic implications. The expression of Lamin-B1 was measured by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray containing tumor tissue samples from 763 ccRCC patients. Chi-squared tests, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to investigate the possible association between Lamin-B1 expression, clinical and pathological characteristics and patient survival. High Lamin-B1 expression was associated with poor clinical outcomes and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that Lamin-B1 was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival. Furthermore in vitro data suggested that Lamin-B1 acted as a functional downstream senescence effector in RCC cell lines. In conclusion, patients affected by ccRCC with high Lamin-B1 expression exhibit poor prognosis. Lamin-B1 may serve as a tissue-based biomarker for new therapeutic agents targeting therapy-induced senescence.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; kidney; lamin-B1; renal cell carcinoma; senescence
Year: 2019 PMID: 31402955 PMCID: PMC6676677 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Clinical and pathological features of the study population (n=622).
| Feature | Total n, (%) |
|---|---|
| Fuhrman grade | |
| 1 | 170 (27.3) |
| 2 | 345 (55.5) |
| 3 | 107 (17.2) |
| Tumor grade | |
| 1 | 334 (53.7) |
| 2 | 49 (7.9) |
| 3 | 217 (34.9) |
| 4 | 22 (3.5) |
| Local lymph node metastasis | |
| No | 588 (94.5) |
| Yes | 34 (5.5) |
| Distant metastasis | |
| No | 521 (83.8) |
| Yes | 101 (16.2) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 249 (40.0) |
| Male | 373 (60.0) |
| Age at surgery, years | |
| ≤65 | 353 (56.8) |
| >65 | 269 (43.2) |
| ECOG | |
| 0 | 381 (61.3) |
| >0 | 241 (38.7) |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Figure 1.Immunohistochemical staining of Lamin-B1 expression. (A) Strong positive staining for Lamin-B1 was observed in the majority of ccRCC cells. (B) Moderate positivity was observed in a subset of ccRCC cells. (C) Lamin-B1-negative ccRCC cells; positive endothelial cells and lymphocytes can be seen. Scale bars, 50 µm. (D) Parenchyma of the renal cortex-the majority of the cells of the distal convoluted tubule were positive for Lamin-B1 when compared with only single cells with weak positivity in the proximal convoluted tubule. Scale bar, 250 µm. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 2.Analysis of cancer-specific survival in ccRCCs. (A) Association between survival times and Lamin-B1 expression presented as Kaplan-Meier plots and subset analysis: (B) high-grade vs. low-grade ccRCCs, (C) advanced vs. restricted tumor extent and (D) localized vs. distant disease. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 3.Relative distribution of Lamin-B1 positive cells in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The dashed line represents the cut-off value (60%) and comparison of Lamin-B1 expression with clinical and pathological features. N, no; Y, yes.
Figure 4.Survival analysis. (A) Univariate and (B) multivariate survival analysis of prognostic factors influencing cancer-specific survival in clear cell renal cell carcinomas represented as forest plots, where the following comparisons have been applied: (1) G3 vs. G1/G2; (2) pT3/pT4 vs. pT1/pT2; (3) pN1/pN2 vs. N0/pN0; (4) M1 vs. M0; (5) ≥1 vs. 0; (6) >65 vs. ≤65%; (7) female vs. male; and (8) >60 % vs. ≤60%. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5.Regulation of Lamin-B1 in RCC cell lines upon etoposide treatment. Representative (A and E) Ki-67 and (C and G) Lamin-B1 staining of (A and C) etoposide treated and (E and G) untreated 769-P cells. (B, D, F and H) Corresponding positive cell count markup. Blue indicates negative nuclei; and red indicates positive nuclei. (I and J) Box plots demonstrating the differences in the etoposide response in RCC cell lines. RCC, renal cell carcinoma; Eto, etoposide; Ctrl, control.