Literature DB >> 31402432

Photobiomodulation therapy and NMES improve muscle strength and jumping performance in young volleyball athletes: a randomized controlled trial study in Brazil.

Ronaldo Alves da Cunha1, Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi2, Alberto de Castro Pochini3, Moisés Cohen3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of adding photobiomodulation therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to volleyball athletes' training, focusing on muscle strength and jumping skills. Thirty-six athletes were randomly placed into three groups: control, photobiomodulation therapy, and NMES. The athletes trained to improve their muscle strength and jumping skills. The athletes in the photobiomodulation therapy group were submitted to photobiomodulation therapy (850 nm, continuous, energy density 0.8 J/cm2, radiant energy per point 6 J, total radiant energy 36 J) before undergoing strength and plyometric training. The NMES group additionally underwent NMES-based quadriceps femoris muscle strength training (base frequency 1 kHz, frequency modulation 70 Hz, intensity maximum tolerable). The variables analyzed were muscle strength, jumping ability, global impression, and jump frequency; they were measured at baseline and during follow-ups at 6 and 8 weeks. The statistical analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The between-group differences and their respective 95% CIs were calculated using linear mixed models by using group, time, and group-versus-time interaction terms. Dominant lower limb strength improved the most in the NMES group compared to the control group (mean difference = 1.4, 95% CI = .5 to 2.4). Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group (mean difference = 1.1, 95% CI = .3 to 2) and the NMES group (mean difference = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.8) compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved more than the photobiomodulation therapy group (mean difference = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.7). The NMES group had the greatest improvement in global perceived effect scale compared to the control group (mean difference = 1.1, 95% CI = 1 to 2.2). Dominant lower limb strength improved in the NMES group compared to the control group. Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group and the NMES group compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved significantly more than the photobiomodulation therapy group; the NMES group also improved in the global perceived effect scale compared to the control group. This study found that, for volleyball athletes, photobiomodulation therapy and NMES both promoted benefits in terms of muscle-strength gain. In addition, these benefits were maintained for 2 weeks even after training was interrupted. Dominant lower limb strength improved in the NMES group compared to the control group. Non-dominant lower limb strength increased in both the photobiomodulation therapy group and the NMES group compared to the control group, but the NMES group improved significantly more than the photobiomodulation therapy group; the NMES group also improved in global impression of jumps compared to the control group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Athletic performance; Muscle strength; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Photobiomodulation therapy; Sports

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31402432     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02858-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Muscular Performance and Soreness Recovery in Athletes: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wun-Ting Luo; Chieh-Jui Lee; Ka-Wai Tam; Tsai-Wei Huang
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Effect of plyometric training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation assisted strength training on muscular, sprint, and functional performances in collegiate male football players.

Authors:  Shahnaz Hasan; Gokulakannan Kandasamy; Danah Alyahya; Asma Alonazi; Azfar Jamal; Amir Iqbal; Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan; Hariraja Muthusamy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  The influence of photobiomodulation on the temperature of the brachial biceps during muscle fatigue protocol.

Authors:  Sadi Fernando Stamborowski; Bruna Moreira de Oliveira Spinelli; Fernanda Pupio Silva Lima; Davidson Ribeiro Costa; Gabriela Aparecida de Silveira Souza; Mario Oliveira Lima; Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes Martins
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Photobiomodulation and Sports: Results of a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Laura Marinela Ailioaie; Gerhard Litscher
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03

5.  The Effects of Whole-Body Photobiomodulation Light-Bed Therapy on Creatine Kinase and Salivary Interleukin-6 in a Sample of Trained Males: A Randomized, Crossover Study.

Authors:  Jamie J Ghigiarelli; Andras M Fulop; Adam A Burke; Anthony J Ferrara; Katie M Sell; Adam M Gonzalez; Luke M Pelton; Jamie A Zimmerman; Shaquille G Coke; Dennis G Marshall
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-29

6.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in early rehabilitation of patients with postoperative complications after cardiovascular surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alexey Nikolaevich Sumin; Pavel Alexandrovich Oleinik; Andrey Viktorovich Bezdenezhnykh; Anna Valeryvena Ivanova
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.