Literature DB >> 31402225

Return to Sports and Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anatomic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation.

Dhong Won Lee1, Jin Goo Kim2, Sang Jin Yang3, Seung Ik Cho4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with remnant preservation in highly active patients and to investigate the rate of return to sports (RTS), quality of sports activities, and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Patients with a Tegner activity scale of >5 who underwent isolated PCLR from 2013 to 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Single-bundle PCLR was performed using fresh frozen allograft irradiated with 50 kGy. Subjective assessments included the Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Tegner activity scale. A questionnaire elicited information associated with RTS and satisfaction. Functional tests included isokinetic muscle strength and single-leg hop tests.
RESULTS: We evaluated 52 patients, with a mean (± standard deviation) follow-up duration of 29.5 ± 8.6 months. The subjective assessments and functional tests significantly improved postoperatively (all P < .001). Mean time to return to full sports activity was 9.7 ± 5.1 months. Thirty-eight (73.1%) and 45 (86.5%) patients could return to previous sports activities at 9 and 24 months, respectively. A sports-experience questionnaire indicated that 48% and 69.2% of the patients were participating with unlimited effort and performance, respectively, and no pain at 9 and 24 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that extensor deficit (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.342 to 17.839), flexor deficit at 60°/s (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.081 to 14.476), Limb Symmetry Index (%) for the single-leg vertical jump test (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.212 to 9.227), and satisfaction (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.186 to 10.281) were significantly associated with failure of not returning to preinjury sports activity levels at the 9-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic anatomic PCLR with remnant preservation showed high rates of RTS and high patient satisfaction, as well as satisfactory clinical results in highly active patients. This surgical technique could be an effective treatment for grade III posterior cruciate ligament injury in highly active patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31402225     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

1.  Association between Functional Performance and Return to Performance in High-Impact Sports after Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Astrid Vereijken; Inne Aerts; Jorrit Jetten; Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Romain Meeusen; Emiel van Trijffel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Comparable Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between an Anatomic Tunnel and a Low Tibial Tunnel in Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung-Suk Kim; Jae-Young Park; Soo Yeon Park; Raymond Yeak Dieu Kiat; Sang-Gyun Kim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23

3.  Single-Bundle Anatomical Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation.

Authors:  Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-09-21

4.  Four-Tunnel Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Remnant Preservation.

Authors:  Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-09-21

5.  Remnant Tissue Preserved Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Femoral Tunnel Created Behind the Resident's Ridge.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-10-16

6.  Midterm Outcomes After Revision Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Single-Bundle Transtibial Autograft.

Authors:  Yi-Jou Chen; Cheng-Pang Yang; Chin-Shan Ho; Chun-Jui Weng; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Kuo-Yao Hsu; Yi-Sheng Chan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  [Comparative study on effectiveness of posterior-posterior triangulation technique and anteroposterior approach for arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Tengyun Yang; Zhujun Zheng; Yanlin Li; Fuke Wang; Di Jia; Renjie He; Chuan He
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

8.  Remnant-Preserving Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Over Remnant Fibers Using a Figure-of-Four Position and a Posterior Trans-Septal Portal.

Authors:  Yi-Lin Xiong; Chao Su; Shi-da Kuang; Xin Zhao; Yu-Sheng Li; Wen-Feng Xiao; He-Yuan Zhu; Wei-Jie Liu; Shu-Guang Gao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 9.  Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Bálint Zsidai; Nyaluma N Wagala; Jonathan D Hughes; Alexandra Horvath; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Combined posterolateral knee reconstruction: ACL-based injuries perform better compared to PCL-based injuries.

Authors:  Patricia M Lutz; Michael Merkle; Philipp W Winkler; Stephanie Geyer; Elmar Herbst; Sepp Braun; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.