Literature DB >> 31401982

Co-administration of erythropoietin and iron complex improves late-phase liver regeneration.

Ji-Yoon Kim1, Dongho Choi2, Joohwan Kim3, Young-Myeong Kim3, Hyunyoung Lim1, Jeong Min Sung1, Min Kyu Lee1, Yoo Jin Choung1, Ji Hee Chang1, Mi Ae Jeong1.   

Abstract

Erythropoietin and iron have individually shown beneficial effects on early-phase liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PHx); however, there are limited data on the combined effect on late-phase liver regeneration after PHx. Here we examined combined effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO, 3,000 IU/kg) and iron isomaltoside (IIM, 40 mg/kg) on late-phase liver regeneration following PHx and investigated the possible underlying mechanism. Rats administrated with rhEPO showed significantly higher liver mass restoration, interleukin-6 (IL-6, a hepatocyte mitogen) levels, and Ki-67-positive hepatocytes on day 7 after PHx than saline-treated controls. These beneficial effects were further enhanced on days 7 and 14 by co-treatment with IIM. This combination also significantly improved liver function indices, such as increased albumin production and decreased bilirubin levels, but did not alter serum levels of toxic parameters, such as aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase. This study demonstrates that the combination of rhEPO and IIM synergistically improves late-phase liver regeneration and function after PHx, probably by promoting IL-6-mediated hepatocyte proliferation without adverse effects. Thus, this combination treatment can be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients undergoing resection for hepatic malignancies. [BMB Reports 2020; 53(3): 148-153].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31401982      PMCID: PMC7118350     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMB Rep        ISSN: 1976-6696            Impact factor:   4.778


INTRODUCTION

Liver regeneration is a coordinated and homeostatic process that rapidly recoups lost functional liver mass, allowing performance of extensive resection as a curative option for patients with primary or secondary hepatic cancers. However, as excessive resection can increase risk of post-operative liver failure (1, 2) reducing or minimizing further damage to the remnant liver is essential. Additionally, it is also important to successfully stimulate regenerative function and capability of remaining liver tissue after hepatectomy by exogenously supplying or endogenously inducing mitogenic and growth factors (3-7). There are two types of cells responsible for liver regeneration: liver stem cells and hepatocytes. Liver stem cells participate in compensatory regeneration of the liver damaged by viral and chemical insults, and hepatocytes are essential for liver growth or restoration after resection. Because hepatocytes, as fully differentiated and quiescent cells, exist in the G0 phase of the cell cycle (8), liver regeneration after resection requires a priming event that would allow hepatocytes to re-enter the cell cycle from the G0 to the G1 phase, subsequently leading to hepatocyte proliferation. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are potential priming cytokines (9); however, the liver regeneration process can be triggered by multiple signaling cascades activated by coordinated actions with other cytokines, growth factors, and matrix remodeling, and are regulated by several positive and negative cross-talks among growth-related signals (8, 9). The hematopoietic growth factor erythropoietin (EPO) not only stimulates erythropoiesis in bone marrow (10) but also has other multiple functions, including anti-apoptotic and hepatoprotective actions (11). Additionally, administration of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) stimulates hepatic proliferation and liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PHx) (3-5). Similarly, iron supplementation also increases hepatocyte proliferation after PHx (6), probably by enhancing catalytic activity of ribonucleotide reductase (12). Although rhEPO and iron individually improve early-phase liver regeneration in hepatectomized rats, the combination effect and underlying mechanism have not been clearly investigated in late-phase liver regeneration after PHx. The purpose of this study was to assess combined effects of rhEPO and iron isomaltoside (IIM, an iron-carbohydrate complex) on late-phase liver regeneration, function, and toxicity in a rat model of 70% PHx, because, to our knowledge, this has never been done. Our results will assist in clinical development of a therapeutic strategy for hepatic failure resulting from a small remnant liver volume.

RESULTS

Co-administration of rhEPO and IIM promotes late-phase liver restoration

Control remnant livers reached approximately 72% of the relative liver weight on day 7 after PHx, and this recovery effect further increased by treatment with only rhEPO and strongly augmented by co-administration of rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 1). On day 14 after PHx, the regeneration rate of control livers reached approximately 81%, and this rate was slightly increased, but not significantly, by treatment with only rhEPO and significantly enhanced by co-administration of rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 1). Their combination also slightly increased hemoglobin and hematocrit levels by approximately 110% (11.94 ± 0.07 vs. 12.98 ± 0.35 g/dl and 38.83 ± 0.48 vs. 42.38 ± 1.07%) only on day 14 compared with untreated control, but did not alter the numbers of white blood cells and platelets. Collectively, these results show that rhEPO promotes late-phase liver restoration after PHx and that this effect is further augmented by co-treatment with IIM.
Fig. 1

Co-administration of rhEPO and IIM synergistically promotes late-phase restoration of liver mass in hepatectomized rats. Rats were subjected to PHx and were administrated with saline, s.c. rhEPO (3,000 IU/kg), or s.c. rhEPO in combination with i.v. IIM (40 mg/kg). Livers were removed on days 7 and 14 after liver resection. Liver regeneration rate was calculated using protocol described in Materials and Methods. n = 8, *P < 0.05 and **P <0.01.

Combination of rhEPO and IIM prolongs late-phase hepatocyte proliferation

To compare the relationship between liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation in rats co-administrated with rhEPO and IIM following PHx, we performed immunohistochemical examination of the expression of proliferation marker Ki-67 in liver tissues. On day 7 after PHx, only a few Ki-67-positive hepatocytes appeared in liver tissues from control hepatectomized rats, whereas the Ki-67-positive index significantly increased by rhEPO compared with the control, and this effect was further augmented by co-administration of rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 2A and 2B). However, Ki-67-positive cells were barely or insignificantly detected in all experimental groups on day 14 after PHx (Fig. 2A and 2B). These results suggest that co-administration of rhEPO and IIM potentially stimulates and prolongs hepatocyte proliferation, contributing to improvement of late-phase liver regeneration after PHx.
Fig. 2

Co-administration of rhEPO and IIM augments hepatocyte proliferation during the late phase of liver regeneration after PHx. Rats were administrated with saline, rhEPO, or rhEPO in combination with IIM following PHx. Livers were removed on days 7 and 14 after liver resection. Liver tissues obtained on days 7 and 14 after PHx were immunohistochemically stained with anti-Ki-67 antibody and secondary antibody labeled with Alexa Fluor 488. Nuclei were also counterstained with DAPI. (A) Fluorescence images were captured using a confocal microscope. Arrows indicate cells stained by antibody for Ki-67 (n = 8). (B) Ki-67-positive cells were quantified by counting the total number of nuclei per high-power field (n = 8). **P < 0.01. ns, not significant.

Co-treatment with rhEPO and IIM maintains high levels of IL-6 but not HGF

Among many cytokines and growth factors, IL-6 and HGF are major priming factors of hepatocyte proliferation (13, 14). We determined serum levels of IL-6 and HGF in hepatectomized rats. Serum HGF levels were not significantly altered by administration of only rhEPO or by the combination of rhEPO and IIM on days 7 and 14 after PHx compared with those in sham and saline controls (Fig. 3A). However, serum IL-6 levels increased, but not statistically significant, by rhEPO in hepatectomized rats on day 7 after surgery, and further significantly enhanced by co-treatment with rhEPO and IIM; however, these effects disappeared on day 14 (Fig. 3B). The present data suggest that co-administration of rhEPO and IIM maintains high serum IL-6 levels during the late phase of liver regeneration.
Fig. 3

Co-administration of rhEPO and IIM increases the serum levels of IL-6 during the late phase of liver regeneration. Rats were subjected to sham operation or PHx and were administrated with saline, rhEPO, or rhEPO in combination with IIM. Blood samples were collected on days 7 and 14 after surgery. Serum levels of HGF (A) and IL-6 (B) were determined using ELISA kits (n = 8). *P < 0.05. ns, not significant.

Co-treatment with rhEPO and IIM improves late-phase liver function

Activities of hepatic injury the marker enzymes aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) slightly increased, but not significantly (relative to statistics), in the sera of hepatectomized rats on days 7 and 14, compared with those in sham animals, and the enzyme levels were not altered by administration with rhEPO or by the combination of rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 4A and 4B). We next examined serum levels of albumin and total bilirubin, as markers of liver function. On day 7 after PHx, serum levels of albumin decreased in hepatectomized control rats compared with those in sham animals, and this decrease was partially recovered, but not significantly, by treatment with only rhEPO and restored to sham control levels by the co-administration of rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 4C). Conversely, serum levels of total bilirubin were significantly elevated in hepatectomized control animals on day 7, and this increase was slightly reduced by the administration of rhEPO and further decreased to sham control levels by co-treatment with rhEPO and IIM (Fig. 4D). However, no significant differences in serum levels of albumin and total bilirubin among all groups were observed on day 14 after PHx (Fig. 4C and 4D). These results suggest that co-administration of rhEPO and IIM effectively restores late-phase liver function in hepatectomized rats.
Fig. 4

Combined effect of rhEPO and IIM on the serum levels of AST, ALT, albumin, and total bilirubin during the late phase of liver regeneration. Rats were subjected to sham operation or PHx. Hepatectomized rats were administrated with saline, rhEPO, or rhEPO in combination with IIM. Blood samples were obtained on days 7 and 14 after resection, and sera were prepared by centrifugation. Serum levels of AST (A), ALT (B), albumin (C), and total bilirubin (D) were determined using colorimetric assay kits and ELISA kits (n = 8). (E) Time kinetics of hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration in the early (hepatocyte priming), middle (hepatocyte proliferation), and late phases (liver function restoration) after co-administration of rhEPO and IIM. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. ns, not significant.

DISCUSSION

Based on the understanding of mechanisms of liver regeneration, several successful strategies have been developed to counteract post-operative liver insufficiency or post-hepatectomy liver failure (15-17). Despite successful hepatectomy, insufficient remnant liver volume and function are central factors in the etiology of fulminant liver failure after major liver resection (18). Thus, some studies have proposed potential therapeutic treatments, such as high-dose insulin therapy and portal vein embolization, which effectively increase regenerative capacity of remaining liver after resection, subsequently improving the outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery (16, 17). Among many possible strategies, a number of growth factors, cytokines, and drugs have been considered as potential candidates for enhancing proliferative capability of remnant parenchymal hepatocytes (3-7). There is some evidence showing that supplementation with either rhEPO or iron improves early-phase liver regeneration and function in hepatectomized rats (3-6,19). However, the combined effect of rhEPO and iron on liver regeneration has not been studied, particularly in the late phase of liver regeneration after PHx. Similar to previous studies in the early phase of liver regeneration (3-5), our study shows the beneficial effect of rhEPO on hepatocyte proliferation and liver mass restoration in the late phase of liver regeneration following PHx. More notably, the effect of rhEPO was further improved by co-administration with IIM, suggesting a synergistic action between rhEPO and IIM in late-phase liver regeneration. Because hepatocytes are quiescent, highly differentiated cells, they are not normally proliferative (8). Special stimulants are required for priming hepatocytes to re-enter the cell cycle into the G1 phase from the G0 phase, and to initiate cell proliferation (9). Priming and auxiliary factors activate hepatocytes in the remnant liver to promote the proper progression of the cell cycle by triggering the signaling pathways of cell proliferation. These pathways are stimulated by several cytokines and growth factors, including IL-6, TNF-α, and HGF, which are endogenously produced after hepatectomy (13, 14). Thus, inadequate production and maintenance of those factors delay liver regeneration and can cause hepatic failure. This unfavorable phenomenon can be overcome by means of exogenous supplementation of hepatocyte-activating factors such as rhEPO and IL-6 (3, 13). Activity of rhEPO in liver regeneration was reported to be synergistically or additively elevated by co-treatment with the antioxidant curcumin (7), suggesting that there are several modes of action, e.g., positive or synergistic cooperation, among the growth-related signaling pathways. Our data shows that the combination of rhEPO and IIM maintains high levels of circulating IL-6 in the late phase of liver regeneration, which plays a pivotal role in priming hepatocytes for proliferation in the early and late phases of liver regeneration (8, 20). This suggests that the combination of rhEPO and IIM potentiates late-phase liver regeneration and function through a mechanism of hepatocyte proliferation associated with long-term maintenance of high IL-6 levels after PHx. Hepatocytes specifically synthesize albumin, urea, and a-fetoprotein, as well as take up bilirubin from blood circulation, which subsequently conjugates with glucuronic acid and is finally secreted into bile (21). Indeed, serum albumin levels decreased by an impaired liver function in hepatectomized mice (22), whereas serum bilirubin levels increased by insufficient liver mass and function (23). Thus, changes in serum levels of albumin and total bilirubin are considered potential indices of the progression of liver regeneration after PHx. Our data shows that rhEPO resulted in an increase in serum albumin levels and a decrease in serum total bilirubin levels in the late stage of liver regeneration, and their circulating levels were further restored to levels of the sham group by the co-administration of IIM. These results suggest that the combination of rhEPO and IIM promotes hepatic maturation and function during the late phase of liver regeneration (Fig. 4D). As the hepatocytic amino acid-metabolizing enzymes AST and ALT are secreted under conditions of liver injury or damage, circulating activities of both enzymes have been used as indicators of liver injury and toxicity. In this study, we found that rhEPO alone or in combination with IIM did not significantly increase serum levels of AST and ALT in the late phase of liver regeneration after PHx, suggesting that the combination treatment does not induce hepatotoxicity. So, we conclude that co-administration of rhEPO and IIM stimulates hepatocyte proliferation and maturation during the late phase of liver regeneration without causing hepatotoxicity. A number of studies have shown that rhEPO treatment is safe and well tolerated in patients with anemia and stroke, improving clinical remission of anemia and neurologic symptoms (24, 25). Although iron is an essential component or a cofactor of many critical proteins and enzymes, such as hemoglobin, cytochrome P450s, ribonucleotide reductase, and many other enzymes, biological free iron causes toxicity by generating reactive oxygen species or free radicals through redox-based reactions. Despite the presence of a biological detoxification mechanism, intravenous infusion or administration of free iron is prohibited. Thus, only a few types of iron complex can be intravenously administrated in the form of iron-carbohydrate complex containing a polynuclear Fe3+ hydroxide that is stabilized by carbohydrate ligands (26), because it is chemically inert and does not generate reactive oxygen species. In this study, rats were intravenously administrated with IIM (MonoferⓇ), which had been recently developed for treating anemia across different therapeutic strategies with a pharmacological safety profile (27, 28). We also found that IIM combined with rhEPO did not cause hepatotoxicity in the late phase of liver regeneration. In summary, our results show that rhEPO administration enhances liver regeneration and function to some extent through maintenance of high levels of serum IL-6 and subsequent stimulation of hepatocyte proliferation for a prolonged period until the late phase of liver regeneration. Notably, these effects were further significantly augmented by co-treatment with IIM, without inducing hepatotoxicity. This strategy may offer potential benefits for the enhancement of liver regeneration and recovery in patients with hepatic malignancy after PHx and in donor patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Inbred male Sprague-Dawley rats weighting 300-350 g (7-8 weeks old, Orient Bio Inc., Sungnam, South Korea) were used in this study. The animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free animal facility with constant temperature of 21 ± 2℃, relative humidity of 45 ± 15%, and a 12 h-light/dark cycle and given standard food and water ad libitum. Experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Hanyang University (approval number 2017-0260A). All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with international guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals.

Experimental design

Rats were randomly divided into a sham group and three experimental groups by using the sealed envelope method. The sham group consisted of eight rats, whereas experimental groups consisted of 16 animals per group. Each group was divided into two subgroups (8 animals in each subgroup). Experimental groups underwent a 70% PHx and were treated with saline, subcutaneous (s.c.) rhEPO (3,000 IU/kg, EporonⓇ; Dong-A ST Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), or s.c. rhEPO in combination with intravenous (i.v.) IIM (40 mg/kg, MonoFerⓇ; Pharmacosmos A/S, Holbaek, Denmark). Rats were sacrificed on days 7 and 14 after surgery.

Surgical procedure

Rats were anesthetized through intraperitoneal administration of 80 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine, and their weight was recorded. After placing rats in the supine position, 24-G angiocatheters (BD Angiocath Plus; Becton Dickinson Medical, Singapore) were inserted into the left femoral artery for blood collection, and blood samples were used for serological and biochemical analyses. A 70% PHx resecting the left and median lobes of the liver was performed according to Higgins and Anderson’s method (29). Hepatectomized specimens were weighed and kept at −80℃. Some specimens were preserved in 3.7% formaldehyde (10% formalin) solution. The abdomen was closed with continuous stitches using 4-0 silk sutures and cleaned with povidone iodine. Rats were given s.c. and i.v. injections of saline for the saline control group, and s.c. rhEPO (3,000 IU/kg) alone or in combination with i.v. IIM (40 mg/kg) for the treatment groups. After finishing surgical procedures, all animals were subcutaneously injected with 5 mg/kg caprofen (RamadylⓇ; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) to relieve pain. Rats were sacrificed on post-operative days 7 and 14, intracardiac blood was obtained for biochemical analysis. Additionally, the livers were completely excised, weighed, and divided into two pieces: one piece was kept at −80℃ and another in 3.7% formaldehyde solution until use.

Regeneration rate

Relative liver regeneration rate was calculated as previously described (30). Basically, body weight of rats was measured before PHx (BWpre-PHx) and at euthanasia (BWeuthanasia), and pre-operative estimation of liver weight (ELWpre-PHx) was calculated from the relative ratio between resected liver weight and relative extent of PHx [(LWresection/70) × 100]. Regenerated liver weight (LWeuthanasia) was measured at euthanasia. Liver regeneration rate was defined as follows: rate (%) = [(LWeuthanasia/BWeuthanasia)/(ELWpre-PHx/BWpre-PHx)] × 100.

Immunohistochemistry

Hepatocyte proliferation was determined by means of immunohistochemical counting of Ki-67-positive cells. Liver tissues fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde solution were embedded in Optimal Cutting Tissue compound (Leica Biosystems, Richmond, IL, USA) and subsequently frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissues were sectioned at a thickness of 10 μm and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100, followed by incubation with blocking solution (Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 30 minutes. The sections were incubated with primary mouse monoclonal antibody against Ki-67 (Abcam, Burlingame, CA, USA; 1:200) for two hours. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa FluorⓇ 488-labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). After mounting with Mounting Medium (Dako North America), images were taken and analyzed using a confocal fluorescence microscope. The percentages of Ki-67-positive cells were quantified using Image software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Biochemical analysis

Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm at 4℃ for 15 min (ScanSpeed 1730R; Labogene, Lillerød, Denmark), and sera were stored at −80℃ until use. Serum levels of AST and ALT were determined using a colorimetric assay kit (Asan Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum levels of HGF and IL-6 were analyzed using mouse/rat HGF Quantikine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (cat. no. MHG00) and a rat IL-6 Quantikine ELISA kit (cat. no. R6000B), purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Serum levels of albumin and total bilirubin were determined using ELISA kits purchased from Shibayagi Corporation (Gunma, Japan; cat. no. AKRAL-120) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA; cat. no. MAK126), respectively.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard error of samples from 8 rats in each group. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data met assumptions of the test, and variance between statistically compared groups was similar. Statistical differences were tested using two-way analysis of variance with Holm-Sidak post-hoc test. P < 0.05 was significant.
  29 in total

1.  Structure, chemistry, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous iron agents.

Authors:  Bo G Danielson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Mechanisms of hepatic regeneration following portal vein embolization and partial hepatectomy: a review.

Authors:  Y Yokoyama; M Nagino; Y Nimura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A link between ferritin gene expression and ribonucleotide reductase R2 protein, as demonstrated by retroviral vector mediated stable expression of R2 cDNA.

Authors:  H Fan; C Villegas; J A Wright
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-03-11       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Critical appraisal of the clinical and pathologic predictors of survival after resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Ronnie T Poon; Eddie K Abdalla; Daria Zorzi; Iwao Ikai; Steven A Curley; David M Nagorney; Jacques Belghiti; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Yoshio Yamaoka; Gregory Y Lauwers; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-05

5.  Liver regeneration is dependent on the extent of hepatectomy.

Authors:  Michelle Meier; Kasper Jarlhelt Andersen; Anders Riegels Knudsen; Jens Randel Nyengaard; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit; Frank Viborg Mortensen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Hepatocyte growth factor/c-met signaling pathway is required for efficient liver regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Chang-Goo Huh; Valentina M Factor; Aránzazu Sánchez; Koichi Uchida; Elizabeth A Conner; Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The role of IL-6 during the late phase of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Maria Pachówka; Jolanta Zegarska; Rafał Ciecierski; Grazyna Korczak-Kowalska
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.530

8.  Liver failure after extended hepatectomy in mice is mediated by a p21-dependent barrier to liver regeneration.

Authors:  Kuno Lehmann; Christoph Tschuor; Andreas Rickenbacher; Jae-Hwi Jang; Christian E Oberkofler; Oliver Tschopp; Simon M Schultze; Dimitri A Raptis; Achim Weber; Rolf Graf; Bostjan Humar; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Erythropoietin promotes hepatic regeneration after extended liver resection in rats.

Authors:  Maximilian Schmeding; Sabine Boas-Knoop; Steffen Lippert; Martin Ruehl; Radjan Somasundaram; Tarkan Dagdelen; Peter Neuhaus; Ulf P Neumann
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  Signals and cells involved in regulating liver regeneration.

Authors:  Liang-I Kang; Wendy M Mars; George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.