Morteza Entezari1, Zahra Kiani Flavarjani2, Alireza Ramezani2, Humayon Nikkhah2, Saeed Karimi3, Hamid Fateh Moghadam2, Narsis Daftarian2, Mehdi Yaseri4. 1. Ophthalmic Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Imam Hossein Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. entmort@hotmail.com. 2. Ophthalmic Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Imam Hossein Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Ophthalmic Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Torfe Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of three intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections alone or in combination with intravitreal erythropoietin (EPO) in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, 48 eyes of 34 diabetic patients with refractory DME were enrolled. Eyes were randomly assigned to receive either 3 monthly injections of 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB plus 0.05 cc (1000 unit) EPO or 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB alone. Main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes and secondary outcome was central macular thickness (CMT). The patients were followed for 6 months. RESULTS:Mean BCVA changes up to 4 and 6 months were insignificant in both groups. It changed from 0.72 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.74 ± 0.5 (P = 0.85) and 0.71 ± 0.44 (P = 0.40) in the combination group and from 0.48 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.47 ± 0.35 (P = 0.48) and 0.52 ± 0.33 (P = 0.69) in the IVB alone group, at 4 and 6 months, respectively. The difference of mean BCVA changes between the groups was insignificant at both 4 and 6 months (P = 0.07 and P = 0.36, respectively). Within the group changes of mean CMT were significant only in the combination group at 4 and 6 months, from 518 ± 134 μ at baseline to 472 ± 151 to 475 ± 167 μ, respectively (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05). Corresponding changes were not significant in the IVB alone group. However, the difference between the groups was not significant at all visits (P = 0.51 and P = 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial demonstrated that intravitreal erythropoietin had no additional effect to IVB in the treatment of refractory DME in the short term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT03821168.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of three intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections alone or in combination with intravitreal erythropoietin (EPO) in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, 48 eyes of 34 diabeticpatients with refractory DME were enrolled. Eyes were randomly assigned to receive either 3 monthly injections of 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB plus 0.05 cc (1000 unit) EPO or 0.05 cc (1.25 mg) IVB alone. Main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes and secondary outcome was central macular thickness (CMT). The patients were followed for 6 months. RESULTS: Mean BCVA changes up to 4 and 6 months were insignificant in both groups. It changed from 0.72 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.74 ± 0.5 (P = 0.85) and 0.71 ± 0.44 (P = 0.40) in the combination group and from 0.48 ± 0.39 logMAR to 0.47 ± 0.35 (P = 0.48) and 0.52 ± 0.33 (P = 0.69) in the IVB alone group, at 4 and 6 months, respectively. The difference of mean BCVA changes between the groups was insignificant at both 4 and 6 months (P = 0.07 and P = 0.36, respectively). Within the group changes of mean CMT were significant only in the combination group at 4 and 6 months, from 518 ± 134 μ at baseline to 472 ± 151 to 475 ± 167 μ, respectively (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05). Corresponding changes were not significant in the IVB alone group. However, the difference between the groups was not significant at all visits (P = 0.51 and P = 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial demonstrated that intravitreal erythropoietin had no additional effect to IVB in the treatment of refractory DME in the short term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT03821168.
Authors: Marco A Bonini-Filho; Rodrigo Jorge; José C Barbosa; Daniela Calucci; Jose A Cardillo; Rogério A Costa Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: E Chew; S Strauber; R Beck; L P Aiello; A Antoszyk; N Bressler; D Browning; R Danis; J Fan; C Flaxel; S Friedman; A Glassman; C Kollman; H Lazarus Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Joanne W Y Yau; Sophie L Rogers; Ryo Kawasaki; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Jonathan W Kowalski; Toke Bek; Shih-Jen Chen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Astrid Fletcher; Jakob Grauslund; Steven Haffner; Richard F Hamman; M Kamran Ikram; Takamasa Kayama; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Sannapaneni Krishnaiah; Korapat Mayurasakorn; Joseph P O'Hare; Trevor J Orchard; Massimo Porta; Mohan Rema; Monique S Roy; Tarun Sharma; Jonathan Shaw; Hugh Taylor; James M Tielsch; Rohit Varma; Jie Jin Wang; Ningli Wang; Sheila West; Liang Xu; Miho Yasuda; Xinzhi Zhang; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Colin A Bretz; Aaron B Simmons; Eric Kunz; Aniket Ramshekar; Carson Kennedy; Ivan Cardenas; M Elizabeth Hartnett Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Colin A Bretz; Aniket Ramshekar; Eric Kunz; Haibo Wang; M Elizabeth Hartnett Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 4.799