Literature DB >> 31401672

Adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the BOOST-2 perfusion substudy.

Andreas Seitz1, Kai C Wollert2, Gerd P Meyer2, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen3, Carsten Tschöpe4, Andreas E May5, Klaus Empen6, Emmanuel Chorianopoulos7, Benedikta Ritter2, Jens Pirr2, Lubomir Arseniev8, Hans-Gert Heuft9, Arnold Ganser10, Eed Abu-Zaid1, Hugo A Katus7, Stephan B Felix6, Meinrad P Gawaz5, Heinz-Peter Schultheiss4, Dennis Ladage3, Johann Bauersachs2, Heiko Mahrholdt1, Simon Greulich11,12.   

Abstract

AIMS: In the placebo-controlled, double-blind BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration (BOOST) 2 trial, intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) transfer did not improve recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and moderately reduced LVEF. Regional myocardial perfusion as determined by adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (S-CMR) may be more sensitive than global LVEF in detecting BMC treatment effects. Here, we sought to evaluate (i) the changes of myocardial perfusion in the infarct area over time (ii) the effects of BMC therapy on infarct perfusion, and (iii) the relation of infarct perfusion to LVEF recovery at 6 months. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 51 patients from BOOST-2 (placebo, n = 10; BMC, n = 41), S-CMR was performed 5.1 ± 2.9 days after PCI (before placebo/BMC treatment) and after 6 months. Infarct perfusion improved from baseline to 6 months in the overall patient cohort as reflected by the semi-quantitative parameters, perfusion defect-infarct size ratio (change from 0.54 ± 0.20 to 0.43 ± 0.22; P = 0.006) and perfusion defect-upslope ratio (0.54 ± 0.23 to 0.68 ± 0.22; P < 0.001), irrespective of randomised treatment. Perfusion defect-upslope ratio at baseline correlated with LVEF recovery (r = 0.62; P < 0.001) after 6 months, with a threshold of 0.54 providing the best sensitivity (79%) and specificity (74%) (area under the curve, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.92).
CONCLUSION: Infarct perfusion improves from baseline to 6 months and predicts LVEF recovery in STEMI patients undergoing early PCI. Intracoronary BMC therapy did not enhance infarct perfusion in the BOOST-2 trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Bone marrow cell therapy; St-elevation myocardial infarction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31401672     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01537-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  25 in total

1.  Relationship and prognostic value of microvascular obstruction and infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne de Waha; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Georg Fuernau; Philipp Lurz; Anja Leuschner; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stefan Janssens; Christophe Dubois; Jan Bogaert; Koen Theunissen; Christophe Deroose; Walter Desmet; Maria Kalantzi; Lieven Herbots; Peter Sinnaeve; Joseph Dens; Johan Maertens; Frank Rademakers; Steven Dymarkowski; Olivier Gheysens; Johan Van Cleemput; Guy Bormans; Johan Nuyts; Ann Belmans; Luc Mortelmans; Marc Boogaerts; Frans Van de Werf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cell therapy in reperfused acute myocardial infarction does not improve the recovery of perfusion in the infarcted myocardium: a cardiac MR imaging study.

Authors:  Lourens F H J Robbers; Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Alexander Hirsch; Anja M van der Laan; Ronak Delewi; Pieter A van der Vleuten; René A Tio; Jan G P Tijssen; Mark B M Hofman; Jan J Piek; Felix Zijlstra; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Relation of lowering door-to-balloon time and mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  David Zahler; Keren Lee-Rozenfeld; Dor Ravid; Zach Rozenbaum; Shmuel Banai; Gad Keren; Yacov Shacham
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Optimized Treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Giampaolo Niccoli; Rocco A Montone; Borja Ibanez; Holger Thiele; Filippo Crea; Gerd Heusch; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Derek J Hausenloy; Colin Berry; Thomas Stiermaier; Paolo G Camici; Ingo Eitel
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Impact of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors:  Mamas A Mamas; Simon G Anderson; Peter D O'Kane; Bernard Keavney; James Nolan; Keith G Oldroyd; Divaka Perera; Simon Redwood; Azfar Zaman; Peter F Ludman; Mark A de Belder
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction post primary angioplasty.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; Michael C H Leung; Rajiv Das; Gary Y H Liew; Kerry Williams; Benjamin K Dundon; Payman Molaee; Karen S L Teo; Ian T Meredith; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) expert consensus for CMR imaging endpoints in clinical research: part I - analytical validation and clinical qualification.

Authors:  Valentina O Puntmann; Silvia Valbuena; Rocio Hinojar; Steffen E Petersen; John P Greenwood; Christopher M Kramer; Raymond Y Kwong; Gerry P McCann; Colin Berry; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Jörg Barkhausen; Scott D Flamm; Raymond J Kim; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of myocardial stress detection based on feature tracking MRI in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Li Feng; Zhao Yang; Shiyue Chen; Jianghua Wan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.