Literature DB >> 31401079

Physical performance, demographic, psychological, and physiological predictors of success in the U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection course.

Emily K Farina1, Lauren A Thompson2, Joseph J Knapik3, Stefan M Pasiakos2, James P McClung2, Harris R Lieberman2.   

Abstract

This study assessed predictors of successful selection in the very challenging and stressful United States Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection (SFAS) course among 800 Soldiers. A battery of measures were collected during the course and their ability to predict selection were assessed using logistic regression and chi-square tests. Physical performance measures were most predictive, including road march times, land navigation coordinates found, run times, fitness test score, obstacle course score, and pull-ups (p < .05). Soldiers that were officers or 18× enlisted (fast-tracked to SFAS), had <1 year of active duty, ≥ bachelor degree, no children, were not married, and were Ranger school graduates were more likely to be selected (p < .05). Several psychological measures were predictive, including intelligence quotient, grade level equivalents, resilience score, military aptitude score, and grit (p < .05). Basal serum physiological markers weakly predicted selection and were weakly associated with behavioral assessments. Lower C-reactive protein (< 9.5 nmol/L) and higher cortisol and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG) predicted selection (p < .05). Higher C-reactive protein (≥ 9.5 nmol/L) was associated with lower fitness test scores and slower road march time (p < .05). Cortisol was correlated with higher grit and resilience scores (p < .05). SHBG correlated with higher grade level equivalents and better performance on pull-ups, land navigation, obstacle course, and the fitness test (p < .05). Testosterone was correlated with faster run and road march times (p < .05). Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) correlated with lower resilience scores, and DHEA-S, epinephrine, and norepinephrine correlated with worse performance on several physical events (p < .05). These findings suggest measures that could be targeted in interventions to monitor and enhance performance and resilience. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; Cortisol; Intelligence; Resilience; Sex hormone binding globulin; Testosterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31401079     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Resilience of the Hellenic Navy Seals by Electrodermal Activity during Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Stamatis Mourtakos; Georgia Vassiliou; Konstantinos Kontoangelos; Christos Papageorgiou; Anastasios Philippou; Fragkiskos Bersimis; Nikolaos Geladas; Michael Koutsilieris; Labros S Sidossis; Charalampos Tsirmpas; Charalabos Papageorgiou; Konstantina G Yiannopoulou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Utility of extracellular vesicles as a potential biological indicator of physiological resilience during military operational stress.

Authors:  Meaghan E Beckner; William R Conkright; Amrita Sahu; Qi Mi; Zachary J Clemens; Brian J Martin; Shawn D Flanagan; Fabio Ferrarelli; Fabrisia Ambrosio; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-04

3.  Peer Helpers' Experience of Participation in an Adventure-Based Experiential Learning Program: A Grit Perspective.

Authors:  Marica Pienaar; Johan C Potgieter; Cornelia Schreck; Ilana Coetzee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Lessons From Special Forces Operators for Elite Team Sports Training: How to Make the Whole Greater Than the Sum of the Parts.

Authors:  Nathalie Pattyn; Jeroen Van Cutsem; Emilie Lacroix; Martine Van Puyvelde; Aisha Cortoos; Bart Roelands; Veerle Tibax; Emilie Dessy; Magali Huret; Gerard Rietjens; Maarten Sannen; Robert Vliegen; Jean Ceccaldi; Jérémy Peffer; Ellen Neyens; Nathalie Duvigneaud; Damien Van Tiggelen
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings.

Authors:  Marc Vincent Jones; Nathan Smith; Danielle Burns; Elizabeth Braithwaite; Martin Turner; Andy McCann; Lucy Walker; Paul Emmerson; Leonie Webster; Martin Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.