Literature DB >> 31400022

Conducting surveys with multidisciplinary health care providers: Current challenges and creative approaches to sampling, recruitment, and data collection.

Mary Katherine Hutchinson1, Melissa A Sutherland2.   

Abstract

Surveys represent one of the most common and useful ways to collect self-reported data on a wide variety of topics and from a diversity of respondents, including health care providers (HCPs). Unfortunately, survey response rates have been declining for decades; surveys with HCPs often yield response rates of 40% or less. Another major challenge in surveys with HCPs arises from difficulties in identifying appropriate sampling frames. The lack of appropriate sampling frames is particularly problematic when trying to survey multiple types of HCPs or those who work in unusual practice settings or specialties. The purpose of this paper is to describe the current challenges to survey research with college HCPs who are members of multidisciplinary care teams, and propose alternative approaches to sampling and data collection. An exemplar is provided in which three different approaches to sampling, recruitment and data collection were undertaken with a multidisciplinary sample of college HCPs. The three approaches are compared in terms of response rates, costs, and sample characteristics. Differences were noted in effort, response rates, and sample characteristics. Respondents recruited from professional organization mailing lists were disproportionately from smaller, private college/universities, as compared with those recruited from colleges/universities selected from a U.S. Department of Education list. However, no differences in variables of interest were found between the three samples, reducing concerns of potential bias. Developing best practices for surveying multiple types of HCPs will become increasingly important as we seek to better understand current care processes and plan implementation studies to promote the adoption of practice recommendations.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  health care provider surveys; recruitment; response rates; surveys

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31400022     DOI: 10.1002/nur.21976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  3 in total

1.  A web-based survey of UK pharmacists to assess the effectiveness of Viagra Connect® additional risk minimisation measures.

Authors:  Joanna Lem; Janine Collins; Terry Maguire; Rachel E Sobel
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Work environment of hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

Authors:  José Luís Guedes Dos Santos; Alexandre Pazetto Balsanelli; Etiane de Oliveira Freitas; Fernando Henrique Antunes Menegon; Ieda Aparecida Carneiro; Daniele Delacanal Lazzari; Jennifer Aguilar Leocádio De Menezes; Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann; Silviamar Camponogara
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.384

3.  A Multi-Center Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Investigate Interpersonal Violence Screening for Public Health Promotion.

Authors:  Lan Jiang; Melissa A Sutherland; M Katherine Hutchinson; Bing Si
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.