Literature DB >> 31399924

Neural Responses to Sexual Stimuli in Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women: Men's Responses Are More Specific.

Adam Safron1, David Sylva2, Victoria Klimaj3,4, A M Rosenthal3, J Michael Bailey3.   

Abstract

Patterns of genital arousal in response to gendered sexual stimuli (i.e., sexual stimuli presenting members of only one sex at a time) are more predictive of men's than of women's sexual orientations. Additional lines of evidence may shed light on the nature of these differences. We measured neural activation in homosexual and heterosexual men and women using fMRI while they viewed three kinds of gendered sexual stimuli: pictures of nude individuals, pictures of same-sex couples interacting, and videos of individuals self-stimulating. The primary neural region of interest was the ventral striatum (VS), an area of central importance for reward processing. For all three kinds of stimuli and for both VS activation and self-report, men's responses were more closely related to their sexual orientations compared with women's. Furthermore, men showed a much greater tendency to respond more positively to stimuli featuring one sex than to stimuli featuring the other sex, leading to higher correlations among men's responses as well as higher correlations between men's responses and their sexual orientations. Whole-brain analyses identified several other regions showing a similar pattern to the VS, and none showed an opposite pattern. Because fMRI is measured identically in men and women, our results provide the most direct evidence to date that men's sexual arousal patterns are more gender specific than women's.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Category specificity; Reward; Sex differences; Sexual arousal; Sexual orientation; Ventral striatum; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31399924     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-01521-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  5 in total

1.  Reply to Chan et al.: Better delineating female and male sexual orientation.

Authors:  J Jabbour; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Carving the Biodevelopment of Same-Sex Sexual Orientation at Its Joints.

Authors:  Doug P VanderLaan; Malvina N Skorska; Diana E Peragine; Lindsay A Coome
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 3.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Robust evidence for bisexual orientation among men.

Authors:  Jeremy Jabbour; Luke Holmes; David Sylva; Kevin J Hsu; Theodore L Semon; A M Rosenthal; Adam Safron; Erlend Slettevold; Tuesday M Watts-Overall; Ritch C Savin-Williams; John Sylla; Gerulf Rieger; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual Orientation, Sexual Arousal, and Finger Length Ratios in Women.

Authors:  Luke Holmes; Tuesday M Watts-Overall; Erlend Slettevold; Dragos C Gruia; Jamie Raines; Gerulf Rieger
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-07-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.