| Literature DB >> 31399585 |
Min Wang1, Kristian Torbensen1, Danielle Salvatore2, Shaoxuan Ren3, Dorian Joulié1,3, Fabienne Dumoulin4, Daniela Mendoza1,5, Benedikt Lassalle-Kaiser5, Umit Işci6, Curtis P Berlinguette7,8,9, Marc Robert10.
Abstract
Molecular catalysts that combine high product selectivity and high current density for CO2 electrochemical reduction to CO or other chemical feedstocks are urgently needed. While earth-abundant metal-based molecular electrocatalysts with high selectivity for CO2 to CO conversion are known, they are characterized by current densities that are significantly lower than those obtained with solid-state metal materials. Here, we report that a cobalt phthalocyanine bearing a trimethyl ammonium group appended to the phthalocyanine macrocycle is capable of reducing CO2 to CO in water with high activity over a broad pH range from 4 to 14. In a flow cell configuration operating in basic conditions, CO production occurs with excellent selectivity (ca. 95%), and good stability with a maximum partial current density of 165 mA cm-2 (at -0.92 V vs. RHE), matching the most active noble metal-based nanocatalysts. These results represent state-of-the-art performance for electrolytic carbon dioxide reduction by a molecular catalyst.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31399585 PMCID: PMC6689005 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11542-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Cobalt phthalocyanine catalysts CoPc1 and CoPc2 investigated in this study. a CoPc1 bears no substituents. b CoPc2 bears one trimethyl ammonium group at position 1 of the isoindole subunits, and three tert-butyl groups (positions 2 or 3) of the other subunits
Fig. 2Cyclic voltammetry of cobalt phthalocyanine catalytic films. Top a–c CoPc1@MWCNTs, bottom d–f CoPc2@MWCNTs. a, d CV of a cobalt phthalocyanine catalytic film deposited onto a glassy carbon electrode (d = 3 mm) in 0.5 M NaHCO3 at v = 0.1 V s−1 under argon (red, pH 8.5) and CO2 (blue, pH 7.3). b, e CV at various scan rates of the CoII/CoI wave under argon atmosphere. c, f Variation of the peak current vs. scan rate for the CoII/CoI redox wave. A redox active catalyst concentration of Γ = 1.45 ± 0.12 nmol cm−2 was obtained from ip = n2F2vSΓ/4RT for both catalysts
Fig. 3Controlled potential electrolysis of CO2 reduction. a Electrolysis current densities (E = −0.676 V vs. RHE) for a CoPc2@MWCNTs film at various catalyst mass ratio. b Long-term electrolysis (E = −0.676 V vs. RHE) at optimized mass ratio. c Variation of the current as a function of the electrolysis potential at optimized mass ratio (see text). d Current density and rate constant (TOF) for CoPc1@MWCNTs and CoPc2@MWCNTs for CO production in a CO2 saturated solution containing 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 7.3). The uncertainties represent standard errors obtained from four measurements
Comparative data for CoPc1@MWCNTs and CoPc2@MWCNTs catalytic materials during a 1 h electrolysis as a function of the potential in CO2-saturated aqueous solution containing 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 7.3)
| Entry | overpotential (mV)a | Catalystb | TOF (CO, s−1)c | Selectivity (CO, ±0.5%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.676 | 1 | 546 |
| 13.10 ± 0.79 | 4.08 ± 0.25 | 92 |
| 2 | 539 |
| 18.10 ± 0.80 | 6.81 ± 0.30 | 93 | |
| −0.626 | 3 | 502 |
| 9.61 ± 0.51 | 2.97 ± 0.16 | 92 |
| 4 | 498 |
| 12.3 ± 0.34 | 4.46 ± 0.12 | 92 | |
| −0.576 | 5 | 458 |
| 5.57 ± 0.21 | 1.63 ± 0.06 | 86 |
| 6 | 454 |
| 7.75 ± 0.16 | 2.75 ± 0.06 | 84 | |
| −0.526 | 7 | 411 |
| 3.10 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.02 | 80 |
| 8 | 410 |
| 4.33 ± 0.08 | 1.57 ± 0.03 | 73 | |
| −0.476 | 9 | 364 |
| 1.62 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 76 |
| 10 | 363 |
| 2.09 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 65 |
a Corrected from ohmic drop (uncompensated solution resistance of ca. 3 Ω, electrode surface 0.5 cm2)
bΓ(CoPc1) = 23.3 nmol cm−2, Γ(CoPc2) = 14.4 nmol cm−2 (total added catalysts)
cThe uncertainties represent standard errors obtained from four measurements
Comparison of electrolysis performances between CoPc2@carbon powder hybrid catalyst and previously reported state-of-the art immobilized molecular Co catalysts and Ag nanomaterial
| Entry | Catalyst | Electrolyte | TOF (s−1) | CO sel. (%) | Cell type | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| −0.97 [836]a | 0.5 M KCl | 16.3 | 6.1 | 92 | H cell | this work |
|
|
| −0.676 [539]a | 0.5 M NaHCO3 | 18.1 | 6.8 | 93 | H cell | this work |
|
|
| −0.676 [546]a | 0.5 M NaHCO3 | 13.1 | 4.1 | 92 | H cell | this work |
|
| CoPc-CN | −0.63 [520] | 0.1 M KHCO3 | 14.7 | 4.1 | 98 | H cell |
|
|
| CoPpc | −0.61 [500] | 0.5 M NaHCO3 | 18 | 1.4 | ca. 90 | H cell |
|
|
| Coqpy | −0.55 [440] | 0.5 M NaHCO3 | 19.9 | 12 | 99 | H cell |
|
|
|
| −0.31 [200]b | 1 M KOH | 22.2 | 0.54 | 93 | Flow cell | this work |
|
|
| −0.65 [540]b | 1 M KOH | 70.5 | 1.67 | 94 | Flow cell | this work |
|
|
| −0.72 [610]b | 1 M KOH | 111.6 | 2.7 | 96 | Flow cell | this work |
|
|
| −0.92 [810]b | 1 M KOH | 165 | 3.9 | 94 | Flow cell | this work |
|
| CoPc-CN | −0.66 [550] | 1 M KOH | 31 | / | 94 | Flow cell |
|
|
| Agc | −0.81 [700] | 1 M KOH | 156.5 | / | 92 | Flow cell |
|
Entry 1: Γ = 14.4 nmol cm−2 (pH 4, 2 h electrolysis), entry 2: Γ = 14.4 nmol cm−2 (pH 7.3, 1 h electrolysis), entry 3: Γ = 23.3 nmol cm−2 (pH 7.3, 1 h electrolysis), entries 7–10: Γ = 0.216 μmol cm−2 (pH 14, for 0.5, 10, 3, and 0.3 h electrolysis, respectively).
aCorrected from ohmic drop (uncompensated solution resistance of ca. 3 Ω, electrode surface 0.5 cm2)
bUncorrected from ohmic drop
cCarbonate-derived Ag nano-catalyst (500 nm thickness), see Ref. [34] for details
Fig. 4Graphic illustration of the CO2 electrolyzer flow cell. a Cross-sectional view of the cell and b general scheme of the entire experimental set-up
Fig. 5Controlled potential electrolysis and CoPc2 film characterization. a Current density and selectivity for CO production as a function of the potential and b bulk electrolysis at fixed potential (E = −0.72 V vs. RHE) for CoPc2@carbon black deposited onto a carbon paper as cathodic material, in 1 M KOH. c Co K-edge XANES profiles of CoPc2 (black dots) and CoPc2@carbon black before (blue) and after electrolysis (E = − 0.72 V vs. RHE) (red) in 1 M KOH solution