Literature DB >> 31399430

Effect of interventions using physical activity trackers on physical activity in people aged 60 years and over: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juliana S Oliveira1, Cathie Sherrington2, Elizabeth R Y Zheng2, Marcia Rodrigues Franco3, Anne Tiedemann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older people are at high risk of physical inactivity. Activity trackers can facilitate physical activity. We aimed to investigate the effect of interventions using activity trackers on physical activity, mobility, quality of life and mental health among people aged 60+ years.
METHODS: For this systematic review, we searched eight databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to April 2018. Randomised controlled trials of interventions that used activity trackers to promote physical activity among people aged 60+ years were included in the analyses. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017065250.
RESULTS: We identified 23 eligible trials. Interventions using activity trackers had a moderate effect on physical activity (23 studies; standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.55; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.70; I2=86%) and increased steps/day by 1558 (95% CI 1099 to 2018 steps/day; I2=92%) compared with usual care, no intervention and wait-list control. Longer duration activity tracker-based interventions were more effective than short duration interventions (18 studies, SMD=0.70; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.93 vs 5 studies, SMD=0.14; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.54, p for comparison=0.02). Interventions that used activity trackers improved mobility (three studies; SMD=0.61; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.90; I2=10%), but not quality of life (nine studies; SMD=0.09; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.25; I2=45%). Only one trial included mental health outcomes and it reported similar effects of the activity tracker intervention compared with control.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions using activity trackers improve physical activity levels and mobility among older people compared with control. However, the impact of activity tracker interventions on quality of life, and mental health is unknown. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging/ageing; physical activity; walking

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31399430     DOI： 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN： 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity, Function, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Catherine M Said; Frances Batchelor; Gustavo Duque
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.529

2.  Wearable health devices and personal area networks: can they improve outcomes in haemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Jeroen P Kooman; Fokko Pieter Wieringa; Maggie Han; Sheetal Chaudhuri; Frank M van der Sande; Len A Usvyat; Peter Kotanko
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Validity, Reliability and Sensitivity to Change of Three Consumer-Grade Activity Trackers in Controlled and Free-Living Conditions among Older Adults.

Authors:  Kaja Kastelic; Marina Dobnik; Stefan Löfler; Christian Hofer; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  The Evolution of Technology and Physical Inactivity: The Good, the Bad, and the Way Forward.

Authors:  Mary N Woessner; Alexander Tacey; Ariella Levinger-Limor; Alexandra G Parker; Pazit Levinger; Itamar Levinger
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28

5.  The Effect of Consumer-based Activity Tracker Intervention on Physical Activity among Recent Retirees-An RCT Study.

Authors:  Tuija Leskinen; Kristin Suorsa; Miika Tuominen; Anna Pulakka; Jaana Pentti; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Ilkka Heinonen; Jussi Vahtera; Sari Stenholm
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-08-01

6.  Physical activity coaching for adults with mobility limitations: protocol for the ComeBACK pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Leanne Hassett; Anne Tiedemann; Rana S Hinman; Maria Crotty; Tammy Hoffmann; Lisa Harvey; Nicholas F Taylor; Colin Greaves; Daniel Treacy; Matthew Jennings; Andrew Milat; Kim L Bennell; Kirsten Howard; Maayken van den Berg; Marina Pinheiro; Siobhan Wong; Catherine Kirkham; Elizabeth Ramsay; Sandra O'Rourke; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The Implication of Wearables and the Factors Affecting Their Usage among Recreationally Active People.

Authors:  Anna Hendker; Malte Jetzke; Eric Eils; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Dose-response association of implantable device-measured physical activity with long-term cardiac death and all-cause mortality in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death: a cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Li; Shuang Zhao; Keping Chen; Wei Hua; Yangang Su; Jiefu Yang; Zhaoguang Liang; Wei Xu; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Using an Activity Tracker in Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals and Patients.

Authors:  Darcy Ummels; Emmylou Beekman; Susy M Braun; Anna J Beurskens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Effect and feasibility of wearable physical activity trackers and pedometers for increasing physical activity and improving health outcomes in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Singh; Eva M Zopf; Erin J Howden
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 13.077
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.