Literature DB >> 31399214

Harmonizing Experimental Data with Modeling to Predict Membrane Protein Insertion in Yeast.

Christopher J Guerriero1, Yessica K Gomez2, Grant J Daskivich3, Karl-Richard Reutter3, Andrew A Augustine3, Kurt F Weiberth3, Kunio Nakatsukasa4, Michael Grabe2, Jeffrey L Brodsky3.   

Abstract

Membrane proteins must adopt their proper topologies within biological membranes, but achieving the correct topology is compromised by the presence of marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices (TMHs). In this study, we report on a new model membrane protein in yeast that harbors two TMHs fused to an unstable nucleotide-binding domain. Because the second helix (TMH2) in this reporter has an unfavorable predicted free energy of insertion, we employed established methods to generate variants that alter TMH2 insertion free energy. We first found that altering TMH2 did not significantly affect the extent of protein degradation by the cellular quality control machinery. Next, we correlated predicted insertion free energies from a knowledge-based energy scale with the measured apparent free energies of TMH2 insertion. Although the predicted and apparent insertion energies showed a similar trend, the predicted free-energy changes spanned an unanticipated narrow range. By instead using a physics-based model, we obtained a broader range of free energies that agreed considerably better with the magnitude of the experimentally derived values. Nevertheless, some variants still inserted better in yeast than predicted from energy-based scales. Therefore, molecular dynamics simulations were performed and indicated that the corresponding mutations induced conformational changes within TMH2, which altered the number of stabilizing hydrogen bonds. Together, our results offer insight into the ability of the cellular quality control machinery to recognize conformationally distinct misfolded topomers, provide a model to assess TMH insertion in vivo, and indicate that TMH insertion energy scales may be limited depending on the specific protein and the mutation present.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31399214      PMCID: PMC6712491          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  73 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutations of PKD1 in ADPKD2 cysts suggest a pathogenic effect of trans-heterozygous mutations.

Authors:  T Watnick; N He; K Wang; Y Liang; P Parfrey; D Hefferton; P St George-Hyslop; G Germino; Y Pei
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Disease-associated mutations in the extracytoplasmic loops of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator do not impede biosynthetic processing but impair chloride channel stability.

Authors:  M M Hämmerle; A A Aleksandrov; J R Riordan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Cooperativity and flexibility of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator transmembrane segments participate in membrane localization of a charged residue.

Authors:  Kristin Carveth; Teresa Buck; Victoria Anthony; William R Skach
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Stress tolerance of misfolded carboxypeptidase Y requires maintenance of protein trafficking and degradative pathways.

Authors:  Eric D Spear; Davis T W Ng
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations.

Authors:  Todd J Dolinsky; Jens E Nielsen; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Proline-induced distortions of transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Frank S Cordes; Joanne N Bright; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  An unstable transmembrane segment in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.

Authors:  M Tector; F U Hartl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A rhodopsin mutant linked to autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa is prone to aggregate and interacts with the ubiquitin proteasome system.

Authors:  Michelle E Illing; Rahul S Rajan; Neil F Bence; Ron R Kopito
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Membrane proteins enter the fold.

Authors:  Dagan C Marx; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 7.786

2.  Distinct classes of misfolded proteins differentially affect the growth of yeast compromised for proteasome function.

Authors:  Grace D Burns; Olivia E Hilal; Zhihao Sun; Karl-Richard Reutter; G Michael Preston; Andrew A Augustine; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Christopher J Guerriero
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.864

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.