| Literature DB >> 31399130 |
Yuan Fang1, Wen-Qi Shi1, Jia-Tong Wu1, Yuan-Yuan Li1, Jing-Bo Xue1, Yi Zhang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the final phase of China's national programme to eliminate malaria by 2020, it is vitally important to monitor the resistance of malaria vectors for developing effective vector control strategies. In 2017 Shanghai declared that it had eliminated malaria; however, the insecticide resistance status of the primary malaria vector Anopheles sinensis remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylcholinesterase 1; Insecticide bioassay; Knockdown resistance; Malaria; Organophosphate; Pyrethroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31399130 PMCID: PMC6688361 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3657-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of the five sampling sites for kdr and ace-1 genotype detection in Shanghai. Pie charts show the kdr genotypes and their frequencies. Histograms show the ace-1 genotypes and their frequencies. Red and green stars represent the sampling sites for the CM-Dongtan and CM-Xinhe populations, respectively. Abbreviations: HP, Huangpu District; XH, Xuhui District; CN, Changning District; JA, Jing’an District; PT, Putuo District; HK, Hongkou District; YP, Yangpu District
Pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance of a laboratory susceptible strain and F1 progeny of two field populations of Anopheles sinensis from Chongming District, Shanghai
| Population | 0.15% cyfluthrin | 0.05% α-cypermethrin | 0.05% deltamethrin | 1% fenitrothion | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| KT50/min (95% CI) | Mort (%) (mean ± SD) | Status |
| KT50/min (95% CI) | Mort (%) (mean ± SD) | Status |
| KT50/min (95% CI) | Mort (%) (mean ± SD) | Status |
| KT50/min (95% CI) | Mort (%) (mean ± SD) | Status | |
| Laboratory susceptible strain | 120 | 10.61 (9.22–11.76) | 100.00 ± 0.00 | S | 123 | 21.18 (19.60–22.86) | 99.02 ± 0.58 | S | 121 | 17.19 (16.09–18.32) | 100.00 ± 0.00 | S | 132 | 55.05 (50.73–61.15) | 98.61 ± 1.76 | S |
| CM-Dongtan population | 105 | 16.69 (15.15–18.22) | 91.90 ± 7.33 | PR | 144 | 20.46 (19.10–21.93) | 81.19 ± 12.19 | PR | 120 | 24.71 (22.34–27.20) | 98.03 ± 3.40 | S | 123 | 109.50 (76.71–558.23) | 100.00 ± 0.00 | S |
| CM-Xinhe population | 174 | 64.72 (52.22–98.61) | 64.76 ± 6.17** | R | 150 | 77.29 (60.87–114.90) | 21.23 ± 7.02** | R | 108 | 89.56 (65.77–162.03) | 26.57 ± 20.01** | R | 108 | 130.14 (86.65–506.19) | 51.77 ± 16.11* | R |
Abbreviations: KT50, 50% knockdown resistance; Mort, mortality rate; CM, Chongming; CI, confidence interval; S, susceptible (mortality rate > 98%); SD, standard deviation; PR, probably resistant (mortality rate 80–98%); R, resistant (mortality rate < 80%)
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01
Distributions, polymorphisms and mutation frequencies of kdr alleles and genotypes in Anopheles sinensis populations in Shanghai
| Population | CM-Dongtan population | CM-Xinhe population | Songjiang population | Jiading population | Qingpu population | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| TTG (L) | 234 | 100 | 75 | 34.40 | 4 | 9.09 | 2 | 6.67 | 2 | 11.11 |
| TTT (F) | 93 | 42.66 | 27 | 61.36 | 21 | 70.00 | 10 | 55.56 | ||
| TGT (C) | 49 | 22.48 | 12 | 27.27 | 7 | 23.33 | 5 | 27.78 | ||
| TTC (F) | 1 | 0.46 | 1 | 2.27 | 1 | 5.56 | ||||
| L/L (TTG/TTG) | 117 | 100 | 21 | 19.27 | ||||||
| L/C (TTG/TGT) | 17 | 15.60 | 1 | 4.55 | 1 | 6.67 | ||||
| L/F (TTG/TTT) | 16 | 14.68 | 3 | 13.64 | 1 | 6.67 | 2 | 22.22 | ||
| F/C (TTT/TGT) | 25 | 22.94 | 11 | 50.00 | 4 | 26.67 | 1 | 11.11 | ||
| F/C (TTC/TGT) | 1 | 0.92 | ||||||||
| F/F (TTT/TTT) | 26 | 23.85 | 6 | 27.27 | 8 | 53.33 | 3 | 33.33 | ||
| F/F (TTC/TTT) | 1 | 4.55 | 1 | 11.11 | ||||||
| C/C (TGT/TGT) | 3 | 2.75 | 1 | 6.67 | 2 | 22.22 | ||||
Abbreviations: kdr, knockdown resistance; CM, Chongming District; n, number; L, Leu; F, Phe; C, Cys
Fig. 2Chromatograms and alignments of the kdr and ace-1 genotypes detected in Anopheles sinensis from Shanghai. a Eight kdr genotypes; codon 1014 of the para-type voltage-gated sodium channel gene is indicated by a red box. b Three ace-1 genotypes; codon 119 of the ace-1 gene is indicated by a red box. Different peak colours distinguish the four bases T (red), C (blue), A (green) and G (black). K = G/T; Y = T/C; R = A/G
Distributions, polymorphisms and mutation frequencies of ace-1 alleles and genotypes in Anopheles sinensis populations in Shanghai
| Population | CM-Dongtan population | CM-Xinhe population | Songjiang population | Jiading population | Qingpu population | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| Frequency (%) |
| GGC (G) | 230 | 98.29 | 114 | 53.27 | 22 | 50.00 | 15 | 50.00 | 7 | 43.75 |
| AGC (S) | 4 | 1.71 | 100 | 46.72 | 22 | 50.00 | 15 | 50.00 | 9 | 56.25 |
| G/G (GGC/GGC) | 113 | 96.58 | 15 | 14.02 | ||||||
| G/S (GGC/AGC) | 4 | 3.42 | 85 | 79.44 | 22 | 100 | 15 | 100 | 7 | 87.50 |
| S/S (AGC/AGC) | 7 | 6.54 | 1 | 12.50 | ||||||
Abbreviations: ace-1, acetylcholinesterase 1; CM, Chongming District; n, number; G, Gly; S, Ser
Frequencies of kdr genotypes in relation to mosquito phenotypical resistance/susceptibility as determined by resistibility bioassays of pyrethroid and organophosphate in F1 progeny of two Anopheles sinensis populations from Chongming District, Shanghai
| Population | Insecticide | Status |
| Frequencies of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1014L/1014L | 1014L/1014F | 1014L/1014C | 1014F/1014C | 1014C/1014C | 1014F/1014F | ||||
| CM-Xinhe population | 0.15% cyfluthrin | Alive | 8 | 12.50 | 25.00 | 62.50* | |||
| Dead | 15 | 13.33 | 13.33 | 26.67 | 33.33 | 13.33 | |||
| 0.05% α-cypermethrin | Alive | 12 | 8.33 | 16.67 | 8.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | ||
| Dead | 9 | 33.33 | 11.11 | 33.33 | 22.22 | ||||
| 0.05% deltamethrin | Alive | 9 | 11.11 | 11.11 | 33.33 | 11.11 | 33.33 | ||
| Dead | 11 | 27.27 | 27.27 | 9.09 | 18.18 | 9.09 | 9.09 | ||
| 1% fenitrothion | Alive | 8 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 75.00 | ||||
| Dead | 7 | 14.28 | 14.28 | 14.28 | 28.57 | 28.57 | |||
| CM-Dongtan population | 0.15% cyfluthrin | Alive | 1 | 100 | |||||
| Dead | 21 | 100 | |||||||
| 0.05% α-cypermethrin | Alive | 4 | 100 | ||||||
| Dead | 17 | 100 | |||||||
| 0.05% deltamethrin | Alive | 1 | 100 | ||||||
| Dead | 23 | 100 | |||||||
| 1% fenitrothion | Alive | – | |||||||
| Dead | 22 | 100 | |||||||
Abbreviations: kdr, knockdown resistance; CM, Chongming District; n, number; L, Leu; F, Phe; C, Cys
*P < 0.05
Frequencies of ace-1 genotypes in relation to mosquito phenotypical resistance/susceptibility as determined by resistibility bioassays of pyrethroid and organophosphate in F1 progeny of two Anopheles sinensis populations from Chongming District, Shanghai
| Population | Insecticide | Status |
| Frequencies of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 119G/119G | 119G/119S | 119S/119S | ||||
| CM-Xinhe population | 0.15% cyfluthrin | Alive | 7 | 14.29 | 85.71 | |
| Dead | 14 | 14.28 | 78.57 | 7.14 | ||
| 0.05% α-cypermethrin | Alive | 12 | 8.33 | 91.67 | ||
| Dead | 9 | 22.22 | 77.78 | |||
| 0.05% deltamethrin | Alive | 9 | 100 | |||
| Dead | 10 | 10.00 | 60.00 | 30.00 | ||
| 1% fenitrothion | Alive | 8 | 100 | |||
| Dead | 7 | 14.29 | 85.71 | |||
| CM-Dongtan population | 0.15% cyfluthrin | Alive | 1 | 100 | ||
| Dead | 21 | 100 | ||||
| 0.05% α-cypermethrin | Alive | 4 | 100 | |||
| Dead | 17 | 100 | ||||
| 0.05% deltamethrin | Alive | 1 | 100 | |||
| Dead | 23 | 100 | ||||
| 1% fenitrothion | Alive | – | ||||
| Dead | 22 | 100 | ||||
Abbreviations: ace-1, acetylcholinesterase 1; CM, Chongming District; n, number; G, Gly; S, Ser