| Literature DB >> 31398886 |
Celia Bañuls1,2, Aranzazu M de Marañón3,4, Iciar Castro-Vega3,4, Sandra López-Doménech3,4, Irene Escribano-López3,4, Christian Salom3,4,5, Silvia Veses3,4,5, Antonio Hernández-Mijares6,7,8.
Abstract
Cellular pathways such as inflammation or oxidative stress are the cause and triggers of disease-related malnutrition (DRM), but the influence of these markers on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between mitochondrial function and ER stress parameters in a DRM population. The study population was composed of 82 outpatient subjects, of whom 45 were diagnosed with DRM and 37 were confirmed to be normonourished according to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition ASPEN criteria. We evaluated anthropometrical and biochemical parameters, pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum. Oxidative and ER stress markers were analyzed in leukocytes. DRM patients showed significant reductions in albumin and transferrin concerning the normonourished group, and also displayed higher levels of hsCRP, IL6, and TNFα, and the soluble adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1. Besides, oxygen consumption and mitochondrial membrane potential were reduced and Radical Oxygen Species ROS production was enhanced in DRM patients. In the case of ER markers, protein and mRNA expression revealed that CHOP, ATF6, and the P-eIF2α signal were enhanced in malnourished patients compared to control subjects. Correlation studies supported a relationship between weight loss and increased inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and compromised function of the ER. Our results demonstrate that ER stress signaling pathways are influenced by inflammation and mitochondrial function in the leukocytes of a DRM population.Entities:
Keywords: disease-related malnutrition; endoplasmic reticulum stress; inflammation; mitochondrial function; outpatient population
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31398886 PMCID: PMC6723381 DOI: 10.3390/nu11081838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Distribution of the different diseases presented by NN and DRM groups.
| NN | DRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Neurological disease | 18.80% | 16.30% |
| Pneumological disease | 31.00% | 20.90% |
| Digestive disease | 23.10% | 20.90% |
| Endocrine disease | 5.10% | 7.00% |
| Cardiovascular disease | 10.70% | 7.00% |
| Viral infection | 6.80% | 12.80% |
| Haematologic disease | 0.50% | 1.20% |
| Neoplasms | 1.50% | 11.60% |
| Other | 2.50% | 2.30% |
Data are expressed as percentage (%) of the total subjects from each group. DRM: Disease-related malnutrition; NN: Normonutrition.
Comparison of anthropometrical, biochemical, and metabolic parameters between normonourished and disease-related malnutrition subjects.
| NN ( | DRM ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57.9 ± 19.4 | 65.7 ± 15.9 | 0.15 |
| Weight (kg) | 65.4 ± 14 | 55.6 ± 10.6 | 0.021 |
| Weight loss (%) | 2.9 ± 3 | 26.2 ± 5.5 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 16.3 | 21.2 ± 2.8 | <0.001 |
| Triceps skin thickness (mm) | 19.3 ± 6.9 | 13.6 ± 4.9 | <0.001 |
| Mid-upper arm circumference (cm) | 28.8 ± 4.7 | 24.7 ± 2.8 | <0.001 |
| Arm muscular circumference (cm) | 22.8 ± 3.4 | 20.2 ± 3.1 | <0.001 |
| Calf circumference (cm) | 36.3 ± 4.1 | 31 ± 2.86 | <0.001 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Prealbumin (mg/dL) | 24.2 ± 5 | 23.3 ± 6.7 | 0.470 |
| Transferrin (mg/dL) | 267.3 ± 64.8 | 236 ± 63.6 | 0.031 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 185.9 ± 32.2 | 184.8 ± 43.9 | 0.865 |
| LDLc (mg/dL) | 110.5 ± 29.1 | 112.3 ± 35.8 | 0.805 |
| HDLc (mg/dL) | 50.8 ± 14.9 | 50.3 ± 15.9 | 0.885 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 98.0 (83.8;126.0) | 92.5(66.3;143.3) | 0.330 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 2.8 ± 2.8 | 4.4 ± 3.5 | 0.038 |
| Lymphocytes (109/L) | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.710 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median, 25th and 75th percentiles for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively. An unpaired t-test was employed to compare groups. p-value when comparing NN vs. DRM. DRM: Disease-related malnutrition; NN: Normonutrition; LDLc: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDLc: High density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Figure 1Serum levels of cytokines and soluble adhesion molecules from NN and DRM subjects. (A) IL6 levels measured as pg/ml. (B) TNFα levels measured as pg/ml. (C) ICAM-1 levels measured as ng/mL. (D) VCAM-1 levels measured as ng/ml. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. NN group using an unpaired t-test. NN: Normonutrition; DRM: Disease-related malnutrition.
Figure 2ROS production, calcium content and parameters of mitochondrial function measured in leukocytes from NN and DRM patients. (A) ROS production of leukocytes from NN and DRM subjects determined by measuring DCFH fluorescence in arbitrary units. Representative fluorescence images of both groups are displayed below the graph. (B) Calcium content of leukocytes from NN and DRM subjects determined by measuring Fluo-4 fluorescence in arbitrary units. Representative fluorescence images of both groups are displayed below the graph. (C) Mitochondrial ROS content of leukocytes from NN and DRM subjects, measured by TMRM fluorescence, in arbitrary units. Representative fluorescence images of both groups are displayed below the graph. (D) Mitochondrial membrane potential of leukocytes of NN and DRM subjects measured by TMRM fluorescence in arbitrary units. Representative fluorescence images of both groups are displayed below the graph. (E) Oxygen consumption of leukocytes from NN and DRM subjects with an oximeter. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 vs. NN group using an unpaired t-test. NN: Normonutrition; DRM: Disease-related malnutrition; ROS: Radical oxygen species; DCFH: 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate.
Figure 3Leukocyte expression of ER stress proteins in NN and DRM subjects. (A) CHOP protein expression relative to actin protein expression, in NN vs DRM patients. (B) ATF6 protein expression relative to actin protein expression in NN vs DRM patients. (C) P-Eif2α protein expression relative to actin protein expression in NN vs DRM patients. (D) GRP78 protein expression relative to actin protein expression in NN vs DRM patients. * p < 0.05 vs. NN group using an unpaired t-test NN: Normonutrition; DRM: Disease-related malnutrition; ER: endoplasmic reticulum
Figure 4Relative mRNA expression in leukocytes of NN and DRM subjects. (A) CHOP gene expression relative to GAPDH gene expression in NN vs DRM patients. (B) GRP78 gene expression relative to GAPDH gene expression in NN vs DRM patients. * p < 0.05 vs. NN group using an unpaired t-test. NN: Normonutrition; DRM: Disease-related malnutrition.