| Literature DB >> 31398880 |
Helen Robinson1, Helen Barrett2, Luisa Gomez-Arango3, H David McIntyre2, Leonie Callaway4, Marloes Dekker Nitert3.
Abstract
The gut microbiome in pregnancy has been associated with various maternal metabolic and hormonal markers involved in glucose metabolism. Maternal ketones are of particular interest due to the rise in popularity of low-carbohydrate diets. We assessed for differences in the composition of the gut microbiota in pregnant women with and without ketonuria at 16 weeks gestation. Fecal samples were obtained from 11 women with fasting ketonuria and 11 matched controls. The samples were analyzed to assess for differences in gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA sequencing. Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis showed significantly different beta-diversity between women with and without ketonuria, but no difference in the alpha-diversity. Group comparisons and network analysis showed that ketonuria was associated with an increased abundance of the butyrate-producing genus Roseburia. The bacteria that contributed the most to the differences in the composition of the gut microbiota included Roseburia, Methanobrevibacter, Uncl. RF39, and Dialister in women with ketonuria and Eggerthella, Phascolarctobacterium, Butyricimonas, and Uncl. Coriobacteriaceae in women without ketonuria. This study found that the genus Roseburia is more abundant in the gut microbiota of pregnant women with ketonuria. Roseburia is a butyrate producing bacterium and may increase serum ketone levels.Entities:
Keywords: Roseburia; ketonuria; microbiome; obesity; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31398880 PMCID: PMC6723895 DOI: 10.3390/nu11081836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Participant characteristics.
| Ketonuria | No Ketonuria | |
|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 11 |
| Maternal age (years) | 33 (29–38) | 32 (29–33) |
| Gestation (weeks) | 14 (14–15) | 14 (14–15) |
| Maternal BMI (kg/m2) | ||
| 25–30 (%) | 4 (36%) | 4 (36%) |
| 30–35 (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| >35 (%) | 7 (64%) | 7 (64%) |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Caucasian (%) | 11 (100%) | 11 (100%) |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 4.4 (4.3–4.5) | 4.2 (4.0–4.4) |
| Carbohydrate intake (g/day) | 137.2 (95.7–171.2) | 155.9 (122.0–170.1) |
| Later developed GDM (%) | 1 (9%) | 1 (9%) |
| Level of ketonuria | ||
| Trace | 8 (73%) | |
| Small | 1 (9%) | |
| Moderate | 1 (9%) | |
| Large | 1 (9%) |
Data presented as median (IQR). BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; g, grams.
Figure 1Alpha diversity of the gut microbiota at genus level between women with and without ketonuria. (A) Alpha diversity as assessed with the Chao1 index; (B) alpha diversity, as assessed with the Shannon index.
Figure 2Beta diversity of the gut microbiota at genus level between women with and without ketonuria. (A) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis by PCoA; (B) supervised clustering analysis by RDA and (C) variance analysis by Anosim analysis. Black circles/squares, ketonuria; white circles, no ketonuria.
Figure 3Network analysis of gut microbiota composition between women with and without ketonuria at genus level. Purple circles, ketonuria; green circles, no ketonuria; lines indicate positive correlations between the abundances of the bacteria. The size of the circle indicates the overall abundance of the genus and the brightness of the color indicates the degree to which the genus is associated with the group.
Figure 4Bacterial genera that are specifically associated with the presence or absence of ketonuria. (A) Abundance of Roseburia between the groups. (B) sPLS-DA analysis of the contribution of bacteria genera to the differences between the gut microbiota between the groups. Black bars, ketonuria; white bars, no ketonuria. ** p < 0.01.