Melissa K Sharp1, Lorenzo Bertizzolo2, Roser Rius3, Elizabeth Wager4, Guadalupe Gómez3, Darko Hren5. 1. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France. Electronic address: msharp@unist.hr. 2. Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004 Paris, France. 3. Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain. 4. School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK. 5. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to identify factors affecting the use of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, specifically authors' attitudes toward and experiences with it. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: An online survey was distributed to authors of observational studies recruited via social media, personal network snowballing, and mass mailings using targeted search strategies. Data on demographics, awareness, motivators, and usage were collected in conjunction with a modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) scale on which confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen participants completed the survey. Of these, 185 (18.2%) indicated they had never heard of STROBE nor used it previously, 195 (19.2%) had heard of it but never used it, and 635 (62.6%) had used it. Journals promoting STROBE were both key motivators and awareness mechanisms; peers and educational workshops were also important influencing factors to a lesser degree. The internal consistency of the modified UTAUT scale was strong (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). CFA supported a four-factor model with 23 questions. CONCLUSION: The endorsement of STROBE by journals is key to authors' awareness and use of the guideline. We tested and validated our scale which can guide future research on reporting guidelines.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to identify factors affecting the use of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, specifically authors' attitudes toward and experiences with it. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: An online survey was distributed to authors of observational studies recruited via social media, personal network snowballing, and mass mailings using targeted search strategies. Data on demographics, awareness, motivators, and usage were collected in conjunction with a modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) scale on which confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen participants completed the survey. Of these, 185 (18.2%) indicated they had never heard of STROBE nor used it previously, 195 (19.2%) had heard of it but never used it, and 635 (62.6%) had used it. Journals promoting STROBE were both key motivators and awareness mechanisms; peers and educational workshops were also important influencing factors to a lesser degree. The internal consistency of the modified UTAUT scale was strong (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). CFA supported a four-factor model with 23 questions. CONCLUSION: The endorsement of STROBE by journals is key to authors' awareness and use of the guideline. We tested and validated our scale which can guide future research on reporting guidelines.
Authors: Anita Rizvi; Daeria O Lawson; Taryn Young; Omar Dewidar; Stuart Nicholls; Elie A Akl; Julian Little; Olivia Magwood; Larissa Shamseer; Elizabeth Ghogomu; Janet Elizabeth Jull; Tamara Rader; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Catherine Chamberlain; Holly Ellingwood; Regina Greer-Smith; Billie-Jo Hardy; Matire Harwood; Michelle Kennedy; Tamara Kredo; Elizabeth Loder; Michael Johnson J Mahande; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Miriam Nkangu; Patrick M Okwen; Jacqueline Ramke; Janice Tufte; Peter Tugwell; Xiaoqin Wang; Charles Shey Wiysonge; Vivian A Welch Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; Raúl López-Izquierdo; Raquel M Portillo Rubiales; Laura N Fadrique Millán; Virginia Carbajosa Rodríguez; Ancor Sanz-García; Guillermo Ortega Rabbione; Begoña Polonio-López; Miguel Ángel Castro Villamor; José L Martín-Conty Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-01-04
Authors: Patricia Logullo; Jennifer A de Beyer; Shona Kirtley; Caroline Struthers; Gary S Collins Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Tasha L Golden; Stacey Springs; Hannah J Kimmel; Sonakshi Gupta; Alyssa Tiedemann; Clara C Sandu; Susan Magsamen Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-03-31