Literature DB >> 31398415

The Outcome of Fertility-Sparing and Nonfertility-Sparing Surgery for the Treatment of Adenomyosis. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Themistoklis Mikos1, Matteo Lioupis2, Christos Anthoulakis2, Grigoris F Grimbizis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the operative issues and specific dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia outcomes in women who had undergone fertility-sparing surgery, as well as determine the expected outcome for extirpative surgery. DATA SOURCES: PROSPERO (ID no. 125692). Search was conducted for eligible studies up to March 31, 2019, on MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-2019), Scopus/Elsevier (1950-2019), and Google Scholar (up to 2019). The search terms applied for the search strategy were as follows: adenomyosis, adenomyomas, uterus-sparing surgery, fertility-sparing surgery, pain, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, uterine volume, adenomyotic volume, case-control studies, cohort studies, and prospective studies. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A total of 443 studies were initially identified. Exclusion criteria was as follows: (1) inadequate description of preoperative adenomyosis or absence of postoperative histology confirmation of adenomyosis, (2) no statement of use of a standardized instrument for measurement of pain, bleeding, or adenomyotic/uterine volume, (3) follow-up <12 months postoperatively, (4) study population <20 women, and (5) non-English language. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: Nineteen studies with a total of 1843 patients with adenomyosis were included. Twelve studies were further analyzed in the meta-analysis. Complete excision of adenomyosis was associated with improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 6.2, 3.9, and 2.3, respectively; the partial excision of adenomyosis was associated with improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 5.9, 3.0, and 2.9, respectively; the studies with a mixed volume of patients with complete and partial excision of adenomyosis reported improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 4.0, 6.3, and 5.1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of adenomyosis results in the satisfactory control of pain and bleeding, as well as in the reduction of uterine volume. Further research is warranted to investigate the long-term control of symptoms to identify any parameters related to the recurrence of adenomyosis, as well as to compare the conservative surgical treatment of adenomyosis with other treatment options.
Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenomyosis; Bleeding; Menorrhagia; Pain; Uterus-sparing surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31398415     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

1.  Transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Simone Ferrero; Carolina Scala; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Ennio Biscaldi; Fabio Barra
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Uterine bleeding: how understanding endometrial physiology underpins menstrual health.

Authors:  Varsha Jain; Rohan R Chodankar; Jacqueline A Maybin; Hilary O D Critchley
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 47.564

3.  Long-Term Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients with Diffuse Adenomyosis after Double-Flap Adenomyomectomy.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Li Shen; Yuan Wang; Mengjia Yang; Zhengyun Chen; Xinmei Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Application of modified subtotal resection of adenomyosis combined with LNG-IUS and GnRH-a sequential therapy in severe adenomyosis: A case series.

Authors:  Zhenyue Qin; Zhiyong Dong; Huimin Tang; Shoufeng Zhang; Huihui Wang; Mingyue Bao; Weiwei Wei; Ruxia Shi; Jiming Chen; Bairong Xia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.