| Literature DB >> 31398372 |
Dan Luo1, Yan Liu2, Rongjuan Chen2, Ming Niu3, Lujie Liu2, Xiaodong Li2, Qi Li2, Bixia Huang2, Jun Wang2, Dongping Xu4, Shumei Lin5.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate clinical occurrence and significance of the rtS78T/sC69* mutation of hepatitis B virus (HBV). A total of 22,009 consecutive chronic HBV-infected patients who underwent resistance testing at the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (Original name Beijing 302 Hospital) from 2007 to 2016 were enrolled. Serum samples were collected for sequence analysis of HBV reverse-transcriptase (RT) and S regions. Phenotypic analysis was performed to evaluate the viral replication capacity and drug susceptibility. The rtS78T mutation was detected in 0.83% (182/22,009) of the patients' samples. All mutations simultaneously created a stop codon at sC69 (sC69*). The prevalence of rtS78T/sC69* did not differ significantly between the patients with and without entecavir/tenofovir treatment. Of the 182 mutation-positive samples, 41 (22.5%) were detected with signature drug-resistance mutations to adefovir (n = 26), lamivudine (n = 11), entecavir (n = 3), and lamivudine plus adefovir (n = 1). The HBV DNA and RNA levels of the rtS78T/sC69* mutant were significantly increased compared to the wild-type; while the mutant had undetectable secreted and intracellular HBsAg, and its half maximal effective concentration to lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir were 3.73-, 1.61-, 4.76-, and 3.71-fold of the wild-type, respectively. Artificial elimination of the rtS78T mutation had a limited effect on the drug susceptibilities. The data obtained in the present study suggested that the emergence of the rtS78T/sC69* mutation was not closely related to entecavir/tenofovir treatment and itself appeared insufficient to confer drug resistance unless it coexisted with signature drug-resistance mutations.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance; Entecavir; Hepatitis B virus; Mutation; Tenofovir; rtS78T/sC69*
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31398372 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antiviral Res ISSN: 0166-3542 Impact factor: 5.970