| Literature DB >> 31398199 |
Mariana Câmara Dos Reis1,2, Inessa Lacativa Bagatini3, Luciana de Oliveira Vidal4, Marie-Paule Bonnet5,6, David da Motta Marques7, Hugo Sarmento1.
Abstract
AmazonianEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31398199 PMCID: PMC6688838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Mean water level and standard deviation in the Lago Grande do Curuai system.
Black points indicate historical water level. Blue points indicate water level from the sampling year. Arrows indicate sampling dates. Data source: Agência Nacional de Águas, Hidroweb (data from 1982 to 2016).
Minimum, mean and maximum values of environmental parameters sampled in both hydrological periods, rising and falling waters.
| Rising | Falling | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. | Avg. | Max. | Min. | Avg. | Max. | ||
| Temperature (°C) | 30.3 | 31.7 | 29.8 | 34.8 | |||
| Water column depth (m) | 1.8 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 4.3 | |||
| OD (mg/L) | 4.6 | 7.5 | 5.9 | 11.7 | |||
| Alkalinity (mg/LCaCO3) | 11.8 | 22.5 | 10.8 | 15.1 | * | ||
| Conductivity (μS/cm) | 38.0 | 81.0 | 34.0 | 59.0 | * | ||
| Secchi disk (m) | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | |||
| Turbidity (NTU) | 4.7 | 24.4 | 5.0 | 48.0 | |||
| Total suspended solids (mg/L) | 32.0 | 90.0 | 6.5 | 51.5 | * | ||
| Si (mg/L) | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.3 | * | ||
| pH | 7.3 | 8.6 | 7.5 | 8.9 | * | ||
| TP (ug/L) | 20.0 | 150.0 | 30.0 | 80.0 | |||
| OP (ug/L) | 10.0 | 140.0 | 10.0 | 50.0 | |||
| TN (ug/L) | 230.0 | 430.0 | 190.0 | 370.0 | |||
| TDN (ug/L) | 130.0 | 420.0 | 180.0 | 320.0 | |||
| NO3- (ug/L) | 0.0 | 130.0 | 10.0 | 200.0 | |||
| TOC (mg/L) | 2.6 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 4.9 | |||
| DOC (mg/L) | 2.9 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 4.9 | |||
| POC (mg/L) | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | * | ||
| DOC/Chlorophyll | 0.0 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | * | ||
| Chlorophyll | 2.0 | 203.9 | 19.5 | 72.8 | |||
| C:N ratio | 10.9 | 27.5 | 13.0 | 20.9 | |||
| C:P ratio | 68.9 | 433.9 | 98.9 | 386.8 | |||
| N:P ratio | 6.3 | 22.6 | 7.6 | 29.7 | * | ||
| Channel distance (km) | 24.2 | 90.4 | 24.2 | 90.4 |
Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences tested by a Paired t-test (*p < 0.05).
Fig 2Phylum–level taxonomic composition of bacterioplankton across sampling sites (FL = free-living and PA = particle-attached).
Fig 3Distribution of free-living (FL) and particle-attached (PA) bacterioplankton phyla in each sampling site, in the two hydrological periods.
Points 2, 10 and 30 are aquatic/terrestrial transition zone (ATTZ) influenced, 15, 24 and 43 are lake sites.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) results for all OTUs, abundant and rare OTUs community composition.
PERMANOVA performed using Bray-Curtis distance and 1,000 iterations.
| R2 | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Influence area | 0.24 | 0.002 | |
| Hydrological period | 0.16 | 0.022 | |
| Influence area | 0.26 | 0.03 | |
| Hydrological period | 0.14 | 0.03 | |
| Influence area | 0.13 | 0.03 | |
| Hydrological period | 0.13 | 0.03 |
Fig 4Distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA) of community composition using Bray-Curtis distance and standardized environmental data.
Samples are identified with the size fraction, free-living (FL) and particle-attached (PA), number of the site and hydrological period, falling waters (F) in green and rising waters (R) in red. Depth, water column depth; Dist_channel, channel distance; DOC_CHLA, DOC/Chlorophyll a ratio; NO3, nitrate; POC, particulate organic carbon; TSS, total suspended solids.