Literature DB >> 31397985

Age and Body Mass Index: the most important factors of urinary and erectile function recovery after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Luciano Alves Favorito1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31397985      PMCID: PMC6837617          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.04.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


× No keyword cloud information.
The July-August 2019 issue of the International Brazilian Journal of Urology presents original contributions with a lot of interesting papers in different fields: Infertility, Bladder augmentation, Bladder Cancer, PCNL, Prostate Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Partial nephrectomy, Renal stones, Nocturnal Enuresis, Basic Research, Laparoscopic Surgery, Penile Cancer, Stress Urinary Incontinence and Adrenalectomy. The papers come from many different countries such as Italy, Brazil, USA, UK, Turkey, China, France, Iran, Republic of Korea, Argentina, India and Spain, and as usual the editor´s comment highlights some papers. We decided to comment the paper about a very interesting topic: Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). Doctor Neumaier and collegues from the FMUSP, Brazil performed on page 703 (1) an interesting study about the factors involved in urinary continence and sexual potency recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). They studied 104 patients operated by two surgeons between 2008 and 2015, with a minimum 12 months follow-up. The patient features (age, body mass index, PSA, date of surgery and sexual function), tumor features (tumor stage, Gleason and surgical margins) and follow-up data (time to reach urinary continence and sexual potency) were collected at 1, 3, 6 and 12 month and every 6 months thereafter. Until the end of the study, only one patient was incontinent and 20.7% were impotent. The authors concluded that the age was a predictor of urinary and erectile function recovery in 12 months and the body mass index was significant factor for potency recovery. With the introduction of robotic surgery, some technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery were lessened, due to, among other factors, the three-dimensional field of vision, hand tremor filtration and greater ergonomic freedom of movement of the surgeon (2-7). RARP in comparison with the open radical prostatectomy is associated with smaller positive surgical margins for pT2 tumors and better sexual function results during 12 months, and less impairment of urinary function during 12 months (8). Retrospective studies indicate that urinary control rates are better in younger patients, although there is conflicting data in the literature (9-12). This can be explained by the degeneration of the rhabdosphincter, which occurs with age. In this paper the authors had 16 patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 at the time of surgery and there was no statistical difference in recovery of urinary continence compared to patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2, but the average time to reach urinary continence was almost double for obese patients. The present paper also confirms that the age in an important factor to impotence recovery. We congratulate the authors for this very important contribution.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy in obese patients: how influential is obesity on operative outcomes?

Authors:  Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Leilei Xia; Xiaohua Zhang; Liang Qin; Shan Zhong; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Inge Geraerts; Hendrik Van Poppel; Nele Devoogdt; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Steven Joniau; Marijke Van Kampen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is safe for patients with prior transurethral prostate surgery.

Authors:  Lawrence H C Kim; Glen Denmer Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Kidon Chang; Trenton Lum; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Haci Ibrahim Cimen; Yavuz Tarik Atik; Serkan Altinova; Oztug Adsan; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Factors affecting urinary continence and sexual potency recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mark Fernando Neumaier; Carlos Henrique Segall; Marcelo Hisano; Flávio Eduardo Trigo Rocha; Sami Arap; Marco A Arap
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  A comparison of perioperative outcome between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Shangqian Wang; Haoxiang Xu; Yiren Gao; Gong Cheng; Lixin Hua
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giray Ergin; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Mustafa Kıraç; Muhammet Fatih Kilinc; Burak Köprü; Bugra Bilge Keseroglu; Mustafa Burak Hoscan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.