| Literature DB >> 31397921 |
Abstract
The ethical issues associated with using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are typically described as consisting of risk assessment and management, public engagement and acceptance, opportunity costs, risk and benefit distributions, and oversight. These are important, but the ethical concerns extend beyond them because the use of genetic engineering has the potential to significantly alter the practices, concepts, and value commitments of conservation. I sought to elucidate the broader set of ethical issues connected with a potential genetic engineering turn in conservation and provide an approach to ethical analysis of novel conservation technologies. The primary rationales offered in support of using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are efficiency and necessity for achieving conservation goals. The instrumentalist ethical perspective associated with these rationales involves assessing novel technologies as a means to accomplish desired ends. For powerful emerging technologies the instrumentalist perspective needs to be complemented by a form-of-life perspective frequently applied in the philosophy of technology. The form-of-life perspective involves considering how novel technologies restructure the activities into which they are introduced. When the form-of-life perspective is applied to creative genetic engineering in conservation, it brings into focus a set of ethical issues, such as those associated with power, meaning, relationships, and values, that are not captured by the instrumentalist perspective. It also illuminates why the use of gene drives in conservation is so ethically and philosophically interesting.Keywords: biología sintética; conservation philosophy; desarrollo responsable; ethical issues; evaluación de la tecnología; filosofía de la conservación; genetic modification; modificación genética; responsible development; synthetic biology; technology assessment; temas éticos; 伦理问题; 保护哲学; 合成生物学; 技术评估; 负责任的开发; 遗传修饰
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31397921 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Biol ISSN: 0888-8892 Impact factor: 6.560