Literature DB >> 31397921

The ethics of genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation.

Ronald Sandler1.   

Abstract

The ethical issues associated with using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are typically described as consisting of risk assessment and management, public engagement and acceptance, opportunity costs, risk and benefit distributions, and oversight. These are important, but the ethical concerns extend beyond them because the use of genetic engineering has the potential to significantly alter the practices, concepts, and value commitments of conservation. I sought to elucidate the broader set of ethical issues connected with a potential genetic engineering turn in conservation and provide an approach to ethical analysis of novel conservation technologies. The primary rationales offered in support of using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are efficiency and necessity for achieving conservation goals. The instrumentalist ethical perspective associated with these rationales involves assessing novel technologies as a means to accomplish desired ends. For powerful emerging technologies the instrumentalist perspective needs to be complemented by a form-of-life perspective frequently applied in the philosophy of technology. The form-of-life perspective involves considering how novel technologies restructure the activities into which they are introduced. When the form-of-life perspective is applied to creative genetic engineering in conservation, it brings into focus a set of ethical issues, such as those associated with power, meaning, relationships, and values, that are not captured by the instrumentalist perspective. It also illuminates why the use of gene drives in conservation is so ethically and philosophically interesting.
© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  biología sintética; conservation philosophy; desarrollo responsable; ethical issues; evaluación de la tecnología; filosofía de la conservación; genetic modification; modificación genética; responsible development; synthetic biology; technology assessment; temas éticos; 伦理问题; 保护哲学; 合成生物学; 技术评估; 负责任的开发; 遗传修饰

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31397921     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Articulating 'free, prior and informed consent' (FPIC) for engineered gene drives.

Authors:  Dalton R George; Todd Kuiken; Jason A Delborne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Synthetic threads through the web of life.

Authors:  Mary E Power
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  N de Graeff; Karin R Jongsma; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Modeling CRISPR gene drives for suppression of invasive rodents using a supervised machine learning framework.

Authors:  Samuel E Champer; Nathan Oakes; Ronin Sharma; Pablo García-Díaz; Jackson Champer; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.