Literature DB >> 31397416

Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study.

Priyatama Meshram1, Vikas Meshram2, Devendra Palve3, Sanjay Patil1, Vandana Gade1, Amber Raut1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marginal adaptability of restorative material is one of the prime factors for success of a restoration. AIM: To evaluate microleakage at enamel restoration and dentin restoration interface of Class V cavities restored with new alkasite restorative material Cention-N, with and without using bonding agent and flowable composite resin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Class V tooth preparations were divided into three groups (n = 10): Group-I restored with Cention-N (Ivoclar Vivadent) without adhesive, Group-II was restored with Cention-N after application of eighth-generation bonding agent (3M ESPE, Single Bond Universal Adhesive), and Group-III was restored with flowable composite resin (Tetric-N-Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent). All samples were subjected to 200 thermocycles between temperature baths at 5°C and 55°C. All samples were cut longitudinally through the center of the restorations with the help of isomet diamond saw. The sections were then observed under binocular stereomicroscope at 20×. Two evaluators scored the depth of dye penetration independently at enamel and dentin margins. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis followed by Dunn's multiple comparison tests were done to evaluate differences among the experimental groups. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the difference between occlusal and gingival scores within each restoration.
RESULTS: Microleakage seen in decreasing order: Cention-N without adhesive >Flowable composite >Cention-N with adhesive.
CONCLUSION: Microleakage at enamel restoration interface was less than microleakage at dentin restoration interface of each group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Least microleakage was seen with Cention-N with adhesive followed by flowable composite. More microleakage was seen with Cention-N without adhesive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bonding agent; Cention-N; flowable composites; microleakage; polymerization shrinkage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31397416     DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Dent Res        ISSN: 0970-9290


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  B Keskus; F Oznurhan
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials.

Authors:  Alpana Kumari; Namita Singh
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N.

Authors:  Maryam Firouzmandi; Ali Asghar Alavi; Dana Jafarpour; Soroush Sadatsharifee
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.