| Literature DB >> 31397258 |
Prince M Amegbor1, Vincent Z Kuuire2,3, Elijah Bisung4, Joseph A Braimah1.
Abstract
AIM: This paper examined the association between wealth and health insurance status and the use of traditional medicine (TM) among older persons in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Ghana; ageing; health care access; health insurance; health utilization; health-seeking behaviour
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31397258 PMCID: PMC8060835 DOI: 10.1017/S1463423619000197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev ISSN: 1463-4236 Impact factor: 1.458
Distribution of study variables (n = 2256)
| Per cent | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Modern facility | 96.8 |
| Traditional healer | 3.2 |
|
| |
| Uninsured | 55.2 |
| Insured | 44.8 |
|
| |
| Richest | 21.2 |
| Richer | 19.7 |
| Middle | 21.6 |
| Poorer | 18.6 |
| Poorest | 18.9 |
|
| 71.2 (mean) |
|
| |
| Male | 49.2 |
| Female | 50.8 |
|
| |
| Akan | 48.3 |
| Ewe/Ga-Adangbe | 18.2 |
| Gruma/Mole Dagbani | 7.9 |
| Other | 25.6 |
|
| |
| Christian | 70.2 |
| Muslim | 15.2 |
| Traditional | 8.9 |
| Other/none | 5.7 |
|
| |
| No formal education | 63.2 |
| Primary | 17.5 |
| Secondary or higher | 19.3 |
|
| |
| Unemployed | 41.7 |
| Working | 58.3 |
|
| |
| Self-employed | 80.0 |
| Private/public sector | 13.4 |
| Informal sector | 6.6 |
|
| |
| Married | 54.2 |
| Separated/divorced | 10.6 |
| Widowed | 35.2 |
|
| |
| Rural | 60.1 |
| Urban | 39.9 |
|
| |
| No | 62.7 |
| Yes | 37.3 |
|
| |
| Good | 31.3 |
| Moderate | 45.4 |
| Bad | 23.3 |
Figure 1.Bivariate negative loglog regression of ‘frequently used health care type’ (n = 2256)
Bivariate negative loglog regression of ‘frequently used health care type’ (n = 2256)
| Coef. | (Std. Err.) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Insured | −0.02 | (0.01) * |
|
| ||
| Richer | 0.02 | (0.01) |
| Middle | 0.05 | (0.01)** |
| Poorer | 0.02 | (0.01)* |
| Poorest | 0.04 | (0.01)** |
|
| 0.00 | (0.00) |
|
| ||
| Female | −0.01 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Ewe/Ga-Adangbe | −0.01 | (0.01) |
| Gruma/Mole-Dagbani | −0.02 | (0.01) |
| Other | 0.00 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Muslim | 0.03 | (0.02) |
| Traditional | −0.01 | (0.02) |
| Other/None | 0.01 | (0.02) |
|
| ||
| Primary | 0.00 | (0.01) |
| Secondary/Higher | 0.00 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Working | 0.01 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Public/private | −0.01 | (0.01) |
| Informal sector | −0.01 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Separated/divorced | 0.00 | (0.02) |
| Widowed | −0.02 | (0.01)** |
|
| ||
| Urban | −0.02 | (0.01) |
|
| ||
| Yes | −0.02 | (0.01)** |
|
| ||
| Moderate | −0.01 | (0.01) |
| Bad | 0.01 | (0.01) |
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05
Multivariate negative loglog regression of ‘frequently used health care type’ (n = 2256)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | (Std. Err.) | Coef. | (Std. Err.) | |
|
| ||||
| Insured | −0.14 | (0.09) | −0.17 | (0.09)* |
|
| ||||
| Richer | 0.37 | (0.19) | 0.40 | (0.18)* |
| Middle | 0.56 | (0.19)** | 0.62 | (0.19)** |
| Poorer | 0.37 | (0.20) | 0.46 | (0.20)* |
| Poorest | 0.48 | (0.18)** | 0.61 | (0.19)*** |
|
| 0.00 | (0.01) | ||
|
| ||||
| Female | 0.06 | (0.11) | ||
|
| ||||
| Ewe/Ga-Adangbe | −0.15 | (0.13) | ||
| Gruma/Mole-Dagbani | −0.38 | (0.22) | ||
| Other | −0.17 | (0.13) | ||
|
| ||||
| Muslim | 0.36 | (0.14)* | ||
| Traditional | −0.08 | (0.19) | ||
| Other/none | 0.10 | (0.17) | ||
|
| ||||
| Primary | 0.06 | (0.10) | ||
| Secondary/higher | 0.17 | (0.15) | ||
|
| ||||
| Working | 0.05 | (0.10) | ||
|
| ||||
| Public/private | −0.03 | (0.18) | ||
| Informal sector | −0.18 | (0.16) | ||
|
| ||||
| Separated/divorced | 0.01 | (0.12) | ||
| Widowed | −0.29 | (0.12)* | ||
|
| ||||
| Urban | −0.01 | (0.09) | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | −0.16 | (0.09) | −0.15 | (0.09) |
|
| ||||
| Moderate | −0.10 | (0.10) | −0.08 | (0.09) |
| Bad | 0.08 | (0.12) | 0.12 | (0.12) |
***p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05
Figure 2.Multivariate negative loglog regression of ‘frequently used health care type’ (n = 2256)