Literature DB >> 31397246

The politics of voluntary self-regulation: insights from the development and promotion of the Australian Beverages Council's Commitment.

Jennifer Lacy-Nichols1, Gyorgy Scrinis1, Rachel Carey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the evolution of the soft drink industry's use of self-regulation as a response to obesity and examine the motivations driving its development and the strategies used to promote it to policy makers.
DESIGN: We used a data set of industry documents published by the Australian Beverages Council (ABC) between 1998 and 2016. We analysed how the ABC voiced its political motivations about self-regulation and what internal nutrition policies it developed prior to its public launch of self-regulation. We also analysed two promotional strategies: funding research and writing policy submissions.
SETTING: Australia.
RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2006, the ABC shifted from a defensive strategy that denied the role of its products in obesity to more conciliatory strategy that emphasised the role of the soft drink industry in solutions to obesity. The ABC deliberately timed the launch of its self-regulation to coincide with an international public health congress. Following its launch, the ABC funded research demonstrating the efficacy of self-regulation and wrote submissions to government nutrition policies arguing that further regulation was unnecessary.
CONCLUSIONS: The soft drink industry uses self-regulation to bolster its reputation and influence nutrition policy. Strategic timing plays a key role in the political influence of self-regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corporate political activity; Nutrition policy; Obesity; Self-regulation; Soft drink industry

Year:  2019        PMID: 31397246     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019002003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  10 in total

Review 1.  The public health playbook: ideas for challenging the corporate playbook.

Authors:  Jennifer Lacy-Nichols; Robert Marten; Eric Crosbie; Rob Moodie
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 38.927

2.  Children's, parents' and professional stakeholders' views on power concerning the regulation of online advertising of unhealthy food to young people in the UK: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Lauren Carters-White; Shona Hilton; Kathryn Skivington; Stephanie Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Simon Barquera; Camila Corvalan; Karen J Hofman; Carlos Monteiro; Shu Wen Ng; Elizabeth C Swart; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 32.069

4.  Industry strategies in the parliamentary process of adopting a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa: a systematic mapping.

Authors:  Safura Abdool Karim; Petronell Kruger; Karen Hofman
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 5.  "Part of the Solution": Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy.

Authors:  Jennifer Lacy-Nichols; Owain Williams
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 6.  Understanding the Political Challenge of Red and Processed Meat Reduction for Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Katherine Sievert; Mark Lawrence; Christine Parker; Phillip Baker
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Reformulation of Packaged Foods and Beverages in the Colombian Food Supply.

Authors:  Caitlin M Lowery; Mercedes Mora-Plazas; Luis Fernando Gómez; Barry Popkin; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  "The architecture of the state was transformed in favour of the interests of companies": corporate political activity of the food industry in Colombia.

Authors:  Melissa Mialon; Diego Alejandro Gaitan Charry; Gustavo Cediel; Eric Crosbie; Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi; Eliana María Pérez Tamayo
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  Whose rights deserve protection? Framing analysis of responses to the 2016 Committee of Advertising Practice consultation on the non-broadcast advertising of foods and soft drinks to children.

Authors:  Lauren Carters-White; Stephanie Chambers; Kathryn Skivington; Shona Hilton
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 6.080

Review 10.  Ultra-Processed Profits: The Political Economy of Countering the Global Spread of Ultra-Processed Foods - A Synthesis Review on the Market and Political Practices of Transnational Food Corporations and Strategic Public Health Responses.

Authors:  Rob Moodie; Elizabeth Bennett; Edwin Jit Leung Kwong; Thiago M Santos; Liza Pratiwi; Joanna Williams; Phillip Baker
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.