Literature DB >> 31396995

Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.

Hyo-Joon Yang1, Dong Il Park1, Soo-Kyung Park1, Chang Kyun Lee2, Hyo Jong Kim2, Shin Ju Oh2, Jung Rock Moon2, Beom Jae Lee3, Jin Sung Koh3, Hyun Soo Kim4, Seon-Young Park4, Dong Hyun Kim4, Jaeyoung Chun5, Eun Ae Kang5, Jung Kim5, Hosim Soh5, Chang Soo Eun6, You Sun Kim7, Yoon Tae Jeen8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: PBK-1701TC is a novel sulfate tablet-based that contains 320 mg of simethicone and delivers 90% of the salt and water delivered by oral sulfate solution (OSS) preparation. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PBK-1701TC compared with OSS in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, phase 3 non-inferiority trial included adults aged 19 years or older with a body mass index of 19-30 kg/m2 undergoing colonoscopy at five university hospitals in Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful bowel-cleansing rate, defined as Harefield Cleansing Scale grade A or B as evaluated by blinded central readers. Secondary endpoints included the presence of residual air bubbles. Adverse events and laboratory evaluations were monitored to assess safety. Tolerability was assessed via participant interview.
RESULTS: Overall, 235 participants were randomized, and 224 were included in the per-protocol analysis (PBK, 112; OSS, 112). Successful bowel cleansing was achieved for 95.5% (107/112) in the PBK group, which was non-inferior to the OSS group (98.2%, 110/112) with a difference of -2.7% (one sided 97.5% confidence limit, -8.1%). The participants in the PBK group had fewer intraluminal bubbles (0.9% vs 81.3%, P < 0.001) and reported a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, with better acceptance, taste, and willingness to repeat the regimen than those in the OSS group (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The novel sulfate tablet, PBK-1701TC, was non-inferior to OSS with respect to bowel-cleansing efficacy and exhibited better safety and tolerability in adults undergoing colonoscopy.
© 2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cathartics; colonoscopy; simethicone; sulfates; tablets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396995     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  4 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Milou L M van Riswijk; Kelly E van Keulen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.337

2.  A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution.

Authors:  Dale R Bachwich; James D Lewis; Vera O Kowal; Brian C Jacobson; Audrey H Calderwood; Michael L Kochman
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  The risk of surgical site infection of oral sulfate tablet versus sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation in colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sung Sil Park; Sung Chan Park; Dong-Eun Lee; Dong Woon Lee; Kiho Yu; Hyoung-Chul Park; Chang Won Hong; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Bun Kim; Byung Chang Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.766

4.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Yong Eun Park; Tae Oh Kim; Jongha Park; Gyu Man Oh; Won Moon; Seun Ja Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.