| Literature DB >> 31396891 |
Megir Schawkat1, Christophe Valmaggia1, Corina Lang1, Hendrik P N Scholl2,3,4, Steven Harsum5, Ivo Guber6, Josef Guber7,8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effect of postoperative posture on the retinal shift after retinal detachment repair.Entities:
Keywords: Macular shift; Pars plana vitrectomy; Posture; Retinal detachment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31396891 PMCID: PMC6858424 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-019-0204-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ophthalmol Ther
Fig. 1FAF 3 weeks after surgery (left) and 8 weeks after surgery (right). The preoperative position of the retinal vessel is illustrated by the white arrows pointing to hyperfluorescent lines. The hyperfluorescent lines were still visible and did not change position in the 6 weeks following surgery
Patient characteristics
| Characteristics | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Female | 14 | 28 |
| Male | 36 | 72 |
| Side | ||
| Left | 25 | 50 |
| Right | 25 | 50 |
| Quadrants detached | ||
| One | 2 | 4 |
| Two | 23 | 46 |
| Three | 17 | 34 |
| Four | 8 | 16 |
| Phacoemulsification | 16 | 32 |
| PFCL | ||
| Yes | 25 | 50 |
| No | 25 | 50 |
| Tamponade | ||
| SF6 gas | 44 | 88 |
| C3F8 gas | 6 | 12 |
| Posture | ||
| Log roll | 26 | 52 |
| Flat | 24 | 48 |
Associations between 5 predictors and the occurrence of postoperative rotation
| Predictors | Groups | Number (%) of patients with rotation | Fisher’s test | Mean rotation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No (0°) | Yes (> 0°) | (if rot > 0°) | (if rot > 0°) | |||
| Posture | Log roll | 14 | 12 (46.2%) | 0.94* | 3.3 ± 2.1 | |
| Lie flat | 19 | 5 (20.8%) | 3.3 ± 1.2 | |||
| PFCL | Yes | 21 | 4 (16.0%) | 0.049* | 2.3 ± 0.4 | |
| No | 12 | 13 (52.0%) | 3.6 ± 2.0 | |||
| Gas | SF6 | 28 | 16 (36.4%) | 0.65 | 3.4 ± 1.9 | n.a. |
| C3F8 | 5 | 1 (16.7%) | 1.7 ± 1.9 | |||
| Age | < 60 | 7 | 7 (50.0%) | 0.03** | 4.2 ± 2.1 | |
| 60–70 | 8 | 4 (33.3%) | 2.7 ± 1.4 | |||
| > 70 | 18 | 6 (25.0%) | 2.5 ± 1.5 | |||
| Quadrants detached | 1 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0.86** | n.a. | |
| 2 | 14 | 9 (39.1%) | 3.5 ± 2.2 | |||
| 3 | 12 | 5 (29.4%) | 3.1 ± 1.7 | |||
| 4 | 5 | 3 (37.5%) | 2.9 ± 1.6 | |||
Number and % of patients with/without rotation in each group are shown, along with the mean ± SD of the degree of rotation among patients with rotation in each group
The significance of group differences (categorical predictors) and of associations with numeric predictors is shown in the table
* The joint impact of posture and PFCL on the occurrence of postoperative shift according to the multiple logistic regression model
** p value from the logistic regression of rotation (yes/no) against age in years or against number of quadrants
*** Linear regression of rotation angle against age in years or against number of quadrants