Brooke Vuong1, Amanda N Graff-Baker2, Mio Yanagisawa3, Sharon B Chang4, Margaret Mentakis5, Veronica Shim6, Michele Knox7, Lucinda Romero8, Gillian Kuehner9. 1. Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center, 6600 Bruceville Road, Sacramento, CA, 95823, USA. Brooke.Vuong@kp.org. 2. Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Fremont, CA, USA. 5. Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center, 6600 Bruceville Road, Sacramento, CA, 95823, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, The Permanente Medical Group, Fremont, CA, USA. 8. Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Vallejo, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of outpatient mastectomies, with and without reconstruction, has increased nationwide. In well-selected patient populations, same-day surgery for mastectomy is a safe option. A pilot project was initiated within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system to facilitate surgical home recovery (SHR) for mastectomy patients, including patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction and bilateral mastectomies. METHODS: Surgical home recovery for mastectomy patients was implemented in October 2017. Specific measures in this initiative included management of patient expectations at initial consultation, education about postoperative home care, multimodality pain management, and timely post-discharge follow-up. All patients undergoing mastectomy were included, except those undergoing autologous tissue reconstructions. After a 6-month implementation period, rate of same day discharge over 6 months was compared before and after the SHR initiative. We also compared emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and readmissions within 7 days. RESULTS: Twenty-one medical centers participated in this initiative. Before implementing SHR, 164 of the 717 (23%) mastectomies were outpatient procedures, compared with 403 of the 663 (61%) after the implementation period. Although the rate of outpatient mastectomy increased significantly, there were no statistically significant differences in ED visits (5.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.98), reoperation (3.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.99), or readmission rates (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: By implementing standard expectations and sharing best practices, there was a significant increase in the rate of home recovery for mastectomy without compromising quality of patient care. The success of this pilot program supports SHR for mastectomy.
BACKGROUND: The number of outpatient mastectomies, with and without reconstruction, has increased nationwide. In well-selected patient populations, same-day surgery for mastectomy is a safe option. A pilot project was initiated within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system to facilitate surgical home recovery (SHR) for mastectomy patients, including patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction and bilateral mastectomies. METHODS: Surgical home recovery for mastectomy patients was implemented in October 2017. Specific measures in this initiative included management of patient expectations at initial consultation, education about postoperative home care, multimodality pain management, and timely post-discharge follow-up. All patients undergoing mastectomy were included, except those undergoing autologous tissue reconstructions. After a 6-month implementation period, rate of same day discharge over 6 months was compared before and after the SHR initiative. We also compared emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and readmissions within 7 days. RESULTS: Twenty-one medical centers participated in this initiative. Before implementing SHR, 164 of the 717 (23%) mastectomies were outpatient procedures, compared with 403 of the 663 (61%) after the implementation period. Although the rate of outpatient mastectomy increased significantly, there were no statistically significant differences in ED visits (5.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.98), reoperation (3.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.99), or readmission rates (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: By implementing standard expectations and sharing best practices, there was a significant increase in the rate of home recovery for mastectomy without compromising quality of patient care. The success of this pilot program supports SHR for mastectomy.
Authors: Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Alison Savitz; Liisa L Lyon; Patricia E Palacios; Brooke Vuong; Maihgan A Kavanagh; Gillian E Kuehner; Sharon B Chang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Swee H Teh; Samuel C Schecter; Edgar B Servais; Kingsway Liu; Jonathan Svahn; Lisa Yang; Monica Goodstein; Richard Parent; Edward Chau; Lynn Chang; Minhoa Zhou; Sharon Shiraga; Michelle Knox Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 16.681
Authors: L J van Zeelst; R Derksen; C H W Wijers; J Hegeman; R Berry; J H W de Wilt; L J A Strobbe Journal: Breast J Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 2.269
Authors: Kshipra Hemal; Carter J Boyd; Jonathan M Bekisz; Ara A Salibian; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-09-22
Authors: Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Gillian E Kuehner; Brooke Vuong; Liisa L Lyon; Lucinda A Romero; Benjamin M Raber; Melinda M Mortenson; Veronica C Shim; Nicole M Datrice-Hill; Jennifer R McEvoy; Vignesh A Arasu; Dorota J Wisner; Sharon B Chang Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michelle Specht; Nikhil Sobti; Nikki Rosado; Eleanor Tomczyk; Olivia Abbate; Dan Ellis; Eric C Liao Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Brooke Vuong; Jennifer R Dusendang; Sharon B Chang; Margaret Ann Mentakis; Veronica C Shim; Julie Schmittdiel; Gillian Kuehner Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-10-03 Impact factor: 6.113