Wei Chen1, Xuanqi Xiong1, Bin Xie1, Yuan Ou1, Wenjing Hou1, Mingshan Du1, Yongling Chen1, Kang Chen1, Jing Li1, Li Pei2, Gang Fu2, Dingyuan Liu3, Ying Huang3. 1. Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China. 2. Department of Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China. 3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing 400038, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) is challenging. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) may improve IFD diagnosis; however, there are no definitive imaging signs for differentiating between bacterial pneumonia and IFD. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated CT images of 208 patients with IFD (n = 102) or bacterial pneumonia (n = 106). We classified pulmonary opacities as consolidations, ground-glass opacities (GGOs), or nodules and recorded the presence of perinodular ground-glass halos, reversed halo sign (RSH), and cavitation (crescent-shaped or not). RESULTS: Consolidation appeared in 83.3% and 92.5% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. Multifocal non-segmental consolidation was more common in IFD (48%) than bacterial pneumonia (22.6%; P < 0.05). Segmental or subsegmental consolidation was more common in bacterial pneumonia (43.4%) than IFD (7.8%; P < 0.01). GGOs and nodules were more common in IFD than bacterial pneumonia (60.8% vs. 24.5% and 54.9% vs. 15.1%, respectively; each P < 0.05). Consolidation combined with GGO, nodules, or both GGO and nodules was more frequent in IFD than in bacterial pneumonia (each P < 0.05). Nodules with halo sign (n = 23) appeared in 22.5% and 3.8% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. Nodules with RSH appeared only in IFD, and those with cavitation appeared in 11.8% and 1.9% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation plus GGO and nodules or consolidation plus nodules is suggestive for IFD. Segmental or subsegmental consolidations are more frequent in bacterial pneumonia than in IFD. Large nodules, as well as nodules with halo sign or both small and large nodules, are related to IFD.
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) is challenging. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) may improve IFD diagnosis; however, there are no definitive imaging signs for differentiating between bacterial pneumonia and IFD. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated CT images of 208 patients with IFD (n = 102) or bacterial pneumonia (n = 106). We classified pulmonary opacities as consolidations, ground-glass opacities (GGOs), or nodules and recorded the presence of perinodular ground-glass halos, reversed halo sign (RSH), and cavitation (crescent-shaped or not). RESULTS: Consolidation appeared in 83.3% and 92.5% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. Multifocal non-segmental consolidation was more common in IFD (48%) than bacterial pneumonia (22.6%; P < 0.05). Segmental or subsegmental consolidation was more common in bacterial pneumonia (43.4%) than IFD (7.8%; P < 0.01). GGOs and nodules were more common in IFD than bacterial pneumonia (60.8% vs. 24.5% and 54.9% vs. 15.1%, respectively; each P < 0.05). Consolidation combined with GGO, nodules, or both GGO and nodules was more frequent in IFD than in bacterial pneumonia (each P < 0.05). Nodules with halo sign (n = 23) appeared in 22.5% and 3.8% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. Nodules with RSH appeared only in IFD, and those with cavitation appeared in 11.8% and 1.9% of patients with IFD and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation plus GGO and nodules or consolidation plus nodules is suggestive for IFD. Segmental or subsegmental consolidations are more frequent in bacterial pneumonia than in IFD. Large nodules, as well as nodules with halo sign or both small and large nodules, are related to IFD.
Authors: Sang Jin Kim; Kyung Soo Lee; Young Hoon Ryu; Young Cheol Yoon; Kyu Ok Choe; Tae Sung Kim; Ki Jun Sung Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S Ascioglu; J H Rex; B de Pauw; J E Bennett; J Bille; F Crokaert; D W Denning; J P Donnelly; J E Edwards; Z Erjavec; D Fiere; O Lortholary; J Maertens; J F Meis; T F Patterson; J Ritter; D Selleslag; P M Shah; D A Stevens; T J Walsh Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2001-11-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: D Caillot; J F Couaillier; A Bernard; O Casasnovas; D W Denning; L Mannone; J Lopez; G Couillault; F Piard; O Vagner; H Guy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tomás Franquet; Nestor L Müller; Ana Giménez; Santiago Martínez; Marta Madrid; Pere Domingo Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Chenggong Yan; Peng Hao; Guangyao Wu; Jie Lin; Jun Xu; Tianjing Zhang; Xiangying Li; Haixia Li; Sibin Wang; Yikai Xu; Henry C Woodruff; Philippe Lambin Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2022-05