| Literature DB >> 31396133 |
Thais C Schuabb1, Lucia H França1, Silvia M Amorim1.
Abstract
Retirement is one of the most serious challenges facing Brazil currently, considering the rapid pace of population aging, growing social inequalities, and the difficulty that Brazilians have in planning for their financial future. The number of studies on psychosocial factors in retirement is limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to determine Brazilian health workers' perceptions about financial planning for retirement, based on studies by Hershey and Mowen (2000). In this study, retirement saving - the dependent variable - is highlighted by the use of a model with the following antecedents: parental influence, retirement goal clarity and retirement planning activity level. The goals of the study were to establish mediating and moderating relationships as an innovative approach to the original model. Data was gathered from 319 workers at a private hospital in the municipality of Niterói, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) who filled out a questionnaire concerning their saving behaviors and antecedents. Results indicated a model in which goal clarity mediated the relationship between parental influence and retirement saving, and retirement activity was observed to influence the level of retirement saving. The findings confirmed the complexities of financial planning for retirement, and emphasized important factors, such as parental advice starting in childhood and the effect of this advice on goal clarity. The results also pointed to the role of individual responsibility in the process, which depended on establishing a plan for activities. In addition to parental advice, an educational approach can contribute encouraging saving behaviors and helping retirees achieve financial security in retirement.Entities:
Keywords: financial planning; goals; retirement; savings; well-being
Year: 2019 PMID: 31396133 PMCID: PMC6664264 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Financial Planning for Retirement Model developed by the authors based on Hershey and contributors (Hershey and Mowen, 2000; Hershey et al., 2007a, 2010; Stawski et al., 2007; Koposko and Hershey, 2014; Koposko et al., 2016; França and Hershey, 2018).
Sociodemographic description of the sample.
| Age (in years) | 319 | 36.2 (8.33) | |
| 20–30 | 95 | 29.6 | |
| 31–40 | 138 | 43.3 | |
| 41–50 | 64 | 20.3 | |
| 51–60 | 22 | 6.8 | |
| Male | 81 | 25.4 | |
| Female | 238 | 74.6 | |
| Marital Status | |||
| Married/In a stable relationship | 174 | 54.5 | |
| Single/Divorced/Widowed | 145 | 45.5 | |
| Nursing | 152 | 47.6 | |
| Administration* | 89 | 27.9 | |
| Rehabilitation | 16 | 5.0 | |
| Radiology | 14 | 4.4 | |
| Pharmacy, Nutrition, Medicine | 20 | 6.4 | |
| Other | 28 | 8.8 | |
| Elementary school (complete/incomplete) | 11 | 3.4 | |
| High school/technical (complete/incomplete) | 107 | 33.6 | |
| Higher education (complete/incomplete) | 117 | 36.7 | |
| Post-graduation (complete/incomplete) | 84 | 26.3 | |
| Up to 24 h a week | 20 | 6.3 | |
| Between 25 and 36 h a week | 61 | 19.1 | |
| Between 37 and 45 h a week | 169 | 53 | |
| More than 45 h a week | 69 | 21.6 | |
| Up to 2 min. wages (up to R$ 1,908.00) | 154 | 48.3 | |
| From 2 to 4 min. wages (R$ 1,908.01 to R$ 3,816.00) | 107 | 33.5 | |
| From 4 to 10 min. wages (R$ 3,816.01 to R$ 9,540.00) | 52 | 16.3 | |
| Above 10 min. wages (R$ 9,540.01) | 6 | 1.9 | |
| Up to 2 min. wages (up to R$ 1,908.00) | 51 | 16 | |
| From 2 to 4 min. wages (R$ 1,908.01 to R$ 3,816.00) | 125 | 39.2 | |
| From 4 to 10 min. wages (R$ 3,816.01 to R$ 9,540.00) | 106 | 33.2 | |
| Above 10 min. wages (R$ 9,540.01 to R$ 19,080.00) | 37 | 11.6 | |
| 319 | 2.98 (1.17) | ||
| No dependents | 35 | 11 | |
| 1 or 2 dependents | 182 | 56.9 | |
| 3 or 4 dependents | 96 | 30.1 | |
| More than 5 dependents | 6 | 1.9 |
Adjust indexes and adjust of factorial load of items of the scales (n = 319).
| Retirement Saving Scale (RS) | 36,478(5) | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.14 | 0.02 |
| Parental Influences on Saving Scale (PI) | 48,461(9) | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Retirement Goal Clarity Scale (GC) | 29,449(5) | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Retirement Planning Activity Level Scale (PA) | 5,972(2) | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Descriptive data (Factorial loads, means, standard deviation, alpha).
| 2.37 | 0.96 | ||
| I have made meaningful contributions to a voluntary retirement savings plan. | 0.77 | 2.31 | 1.10 |
| Relative to my peers, I have saved a great deal for retirement. | 0.85 | 2.41 | 1.10 |
| I have accumulated substantial for retirement. | 0.88 | 2.29 | 1.05 |
| I have made a conscious effort to save for retirement. | 0.89 | 2.41 | 1.09 |
| Based on how I plan to live my life in retirement, I have saved accordingly. | 0.83 | 2.44 | 1.12 |
| 3.09 | 0.97 | ||
| Saving money for the future was an important lesson I learned as a child. | 0.62 | 3.17 | 1.26 |
| My parents did a good job of planning and saving for their own retirement. | 0.71 | 2.70 | 1.18 |
| My parents would expect me to save for retirement. | 0.74 | 3.08 | 1.26 |
| Growing up, my parents helped me to imagine situations when I might need extra money to fall back on. | 0.74 | 2.93 | 1.26 |
| My parents made sure that I understood the value of money and that money is a limited resource. | 0.79 | 3.48 | 1.23 |
| My parents suggested to me concrete ways to save money on my own. | 0.81 | 3.18 | 1.19 |
| 2.95 | 0.84 | ||
| I set clear goals for gaining information about retirement. | 0.77 | 2.89 | 1.03 |
| I have thought a great deal about quality of life in retirement. | 0.68 | 3.41 | 1.10 |
| I set specific goals for how much will need to be save for retirement. | 0.80 | 2.67 | 1.04 |
| I have clear vision of how life will be in retirement. | 0.72 | 2.80 | 1.05 |
| I have discussed retirement plans with spouse, friend or significant other. | 0.61 | 3.00 | 1.22 |
| 2.35 | 0.96 | ||
| Calculations have been made to estimate how much I have to save to retire comfortably. | 0.72 | 2.33 | 1.08 |
| I frequently read books, brochures, or surf the web to learn about retirement planning. | 0.80 | 2.20 | 1.06 |
| I have informed myself about the level of future pension benefits. | 0.88 | 2.52 | 1.16 |
| I have informed myself about financial preparation for retirement. | 0.93 | 2.35 | 1.08 |
Correlation between latent variables (below diagonal) and coefficient of determination (above diagonal) (n = 319).
| Retirement Saving Scale (RS) | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.49 | 0.56 | |
| Parental Influences on Saving Scale (PI) | 0.49 | 0.40* | 0.12 | 0.06 | |
| Retirement Goal Clarity Scale (GC) | 0.51 | 0.70* | 0.35* | 0.55 | |
| Retirement Planning Activity Level Scale (PA) | 0.70 | 0.75* | 0.24* | 0.74* |
Non-standardized coefficient Effects of interaction between variables in four models (n = 319).
| Model 1 | 0.452(0.085)* | – | – | – | – |
| Model 2 | 0.210(0.063)* | 0.665(0.092)* | 0.347(0.074)* | – | – |
| Model 3 | 0.212(0.054)* | 0.287(0.067)* | 0.374(0.070)* | 0.093(0.055)ns | – |
| Model 4 | 0.219(0.059)* | 0.280(0.078)* | 0.344(0.073)* | – | 0.591*(0.086) |
FIGURE 2Financial Planning for Retirement Model with found effects (β).