Literature DB >> 31395635

Whole-Genome Sequencing of Four Campylobacter Strains Isolated from Gull Excreta Collected from Hobie Beach (Oxnard, CA, USA).

Vicente Gomez-Alvarez1, Nicholas J Ashbolt2, John F Griffith3, Jorge Santo Domingo4, Jingrang Lu4.   

Abstract

Campylobacter spp. are commensal organisms in avian species and are one of the leading causes of bacterial foodborne human diarrheal disease worldwide. We report the draft genome sequences of Campylobacter volucris, C. lari, and C. jejuni strains isolated from California gull (Larus californicus) excreta collected from a California beach.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31395635      PMCID: PMC6687922          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00560-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter species are Gram-negative spiral rods, non-spore-forming chemoorganotrophs, and members of the Epsilonproteobacteria class, which grow under microaerobic conditions (1). Several Campylobacter species are recognized as a leading cause of bacterial foodborne infection diseases worldwide and are common inhabitants of the intestine of many wild and domestic avian species (2–4). A previous study documented the presence of a diverse and abundant population of campylobacters in the excreta of California gulls (Larus californicus) from California beaches (5). Although the risk from water impacted by California gulls is low for the community, advances in genomic analysis of potentially human infectious Campylobacter spp. in gull excreta may provide additional information for estimating the risks posed by nonsewage fecal sources (6). Four strains (CaG_5A, CaG_58BB, CaG_63A, and CaG_70BB) were isolated from gull excreta collected in the summer of 2012 from Hobie Beach (Oxnard, CA, USA) following Waldenström et al. (7). The four colonies were transferred to individual Bolton enrichment agar plates (without antibiotics) and incubated at 42°C under microaerophilic conditions (10% CO2, 5% O2, and 85% N2) for 24 h. All colonies were isolated separately, and their genomic DNA was extracted from a single colony using the MasterPure DNA extraction kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI) and purified with the DNA Clean & Concentrator kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic libraries were prepared using the TruSeq library kit followed by rapid mode sequencing (2 × 100 bp) on the HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). A total of 39,770,374 reads were generated. Prior to assembly, the libraries were cleaned of adapters and phiX artifacts, error corrected, normalized (≤100×), and filtered to a minimum length of 80 nucleotides using the software package BBMap v38.22 (with the following settings: ktrim=r k=23 mink=11 hdist=1 tbo tpe maxns=0 trimq=10 qtrim=r maq=12 minlength=100 ecco=t eccc=t ecct=t target=100) (8). A reference-assisted de novo assembly approach was used to assemble the processed reads using Unicycler v0.4.7 (9). Average nucleotide identity (ANI), an index of similarity between two genomes (10), was calculated using FastANI v1.1 (11). The in silico multilocus sequence type (MLST) based on seven alleles (aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, and uncA) was obtained using mlst v2.16.1 (12, 13), genes were assessed for antibiotic resistance with ResFinder v3.1 (14), and chromosomal point mutations were determined with PointFinder v3.1 (15). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. The genome quality and statistics were estimated with BBMap and annotated with Prokka v1.13.1 (16) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Summary statistics of whole-genome assemblies

StrainCoverage (×)No. of contigsAssembly size (bp)Contig N50 (bp)G+C content (%)Gene annotation data (no.)
STb Taxonomic affiliation
Reference genomeGenBank accession no.
GenesCDSa rRNAstRNAsGenusSpecies
CaG_5A238281,547,878313,24428.451,5981,552441NACampylobactervolucrisGCF_000816345SMTU00000000
CaG_58BB231501,537,596170,86629.501,5531,513237NACampylobacterlariGCA_000816385SMTT00000000
CaG_63A197451,687,991219,57930.461,7731,7293402654CampylobacterjejuniGCA_000737085SMTS00000000
CaG_70BB228191,569,087436,70628.411,6311,585441NACampylobactervolucrisGCA_000816345SMTR00000000

CDS, coding sequences.

ST, sequence type (in silico MLST; aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, uncA); NA, not assigned.

Summary statistics of whole-genome assemblies CDS, coding sequences. ST, sequence type (in silico MLST; aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, uncA); NA, not assigned. ANI calculations revealed an average genome similarity of 98.38% between strains CaG_5A and CaG_70BB, which were both distantly related to CaG_58BB and CaG_63A with 79.00% and 81.36% similarity, respectively. Taxonomic affiliation analysis based on the ANI between genomes (17) shows that both CaG_5A and CaG_70BB were closely related to Campylobacter volucris LMG 24379 with 98.16% similarity, CaG_58BB to C. lari CCUG 22395 with 93.51% similarity, and CaG_63A to C. jejuni subsp. jejuni MTVDSCj20 with 98.10% similarity. Only strain CaG_63A was assigned to a sequence type (ST2654), which was previously detected in recreational beaches and environmental waters in France (18). Genome analysis using the Web tool PointFinder (15) confirmed the absence of known chromosomal point mutations or genes associated with antimicrobial resistance except for blaOXA-466 in strain CaG_63A, potentially conferring resistance to β-lactams.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The raw sequence reads have been submitted to the NCBI SRA under the accession numbers SRR8715499, SRR8715500, SRR8715501, and SRR8715502. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Taxonomy of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria: current status, future prospects and immediate concerns.

Authors:  S L On
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001

2.  DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities.

Authors:  Johan Goris; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Joel A Klappenbach; Tom Coenye; Peter Vandamme; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Assessing pathogen risk to swimmers at non-sewage impacted recreational beaches.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Molecular detection of Campylobacter spp. in California gull (Larus californicus) excreta.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; John F Griffith; Nicholas Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter coli in different ecological guilds and taxa of migrating birds.

Authors:  Jonas Waldenström; Tina Broman; Inger Carlsson; Dennis Hasselquist; René P Achterberg; Jaap A Wagenaar; Björn Olsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.

Authors:  Ea Zankari; Henrik Hasman; Salvatore Cosentino; Martin Vestergaard; Simon Rasmussen; Ole Lund; Frank M Aarestrup; Mette Voldby Larsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level.

Authors:  Keith A Jolley; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Campylobacter spp. as a Foodborne Pathogen: A Review.

Authors:  Joana Silva; Daniela Leite; Mariana Fernandes; Cristina Mena; Paul Anthony Gibbs; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Taxonomic affiliation of new genomes should be verified using average nucleotide identity and multilocus phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  María José Figueras; Roxana Beaz-Hidalgo; Mohammad J Hossain; Mark R Liles
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.