Literature DB >> 31395166

Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group.

Dean K Matsuda1, Benjamin R Kivlan2, Shane J Nho3, Andrew B Wolff4, John P Salvo5, John J Christoforetti6, Thomas J Ellis7, Dominic S Carreira8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report comparative hip arthroscopic outcomes of patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer femoroacetabular impingement [FAI]) lateral acetabular coverage.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter registry was performed. Primary hip arthroscopy patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on preoperative lateral center-edge angle: borderline dysplasia (≤25°), normal (25.1°-38.9°), and pincer (≥39°). Repeated-measures analysis of variance compared preoperative with 2-year minimum postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores. Subsequent analysis of variance determined the effect of acetabular coverage on magnitude of change in scores.
RESULTS: Of 437 patients, the only statistical difference between groups was a lower prevalence of acetabuloplasty in the borderline dysplasia group (P = .001). A significant improvement in the preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores for patients with normal acetabular coverage, acetabular undercoverage, and acetabular overcoverage was observed: F(1, 339) = 311.06; P <.001, with no statistical differences in preoperative (P = .505) and postoperative (P <.488) iHOT-12 scores when comparing the groups based on acetabular coverage. Mean iHOT-12 scores increased from 37.3 preoperatively to 68.7 postoperatively (P <.001) in the borderline dysplasia group, from 34.4 to 72 (P <.001) in the normal coverage group, and from 35.3 to 69.4 (P <.001) in the pincer group. These preoperative scores increased by 31.4, 37.8, and 34.1, respectively, with no effect for acetabular coverage on the magnitude of change from preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores: F(2,339) = 1.18; P = .310. Ten patients (2.3%) underwent conversion arthroplasty, and 19 patients (4.4%) underwent revision arthroscopy with no significant effect of acetabular coverage on the incidence of revision or conversion surgery: χ2 (6,433) = 11.535; P = .073.
CONCLUSIONS: Lateral acetabular coverage did not influence outcomes from primary hip arthroscopy when performed in patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer FAI) lateral center-edge angle. Borderline dysplasia and moderate global pincer FAI with no or minimal osteoarthritis do not compromise successful 2-year minimum outcomes or survivorship following primary hip arthroscopy when performed by experienced surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective therapeutic trial.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31395166     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  3 in total

Review 1.  Arthroscopic Treatment of Mild/Borderline Hip Dysplasia with Concomitant Femoroacetabular Impingement-Literature Review.

Authors:  Ran Atzmon; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 2.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Isolated arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular pathologies in mild hip dysplasia: a short-term case control study.

Authors:  Enrico Tassinari; Federica Mariotti; Francesco Castagnini; Stefano Lucchini; Francesco Perdisa; Giovanni Bracci; Monica Cosentino; Barbara Bordini; Francesco Traina
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-12-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.