Literature DB >> 31394924

Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives. A Qualitative Study on Hospital Discharge Experience.

Mel E Major1,2,3, Fenna van Nes2,4, Stephan Ramaekers1,2, Raoul H H Engelbert2,3, Marike van der Schaaf2,3.   

Abstract

Rationale: To target rehabilitation needs of survivors of critical illness and their relatives in a timely and adequate manner, a thorough needs assessment is recommended when hospital discharge planning is initiated. In light of existing evidence on physical and psychological consequences of critical illness for patients and family, it is currently unclear if current hospital discharge procedures suffice to meet the needs of this group.
Objectives: To explore hospital discharge experience and to identify perceived barriers and enablers for a positive transition experience from hospital to home or rehabilitation facility as perceived by survivors of critical illness and their families.
Methods: We performed a grounded theory study with semi-structured interviews among a group of survivors of critical illness and their relatives (n = 35) discharged from 16 hospitals across the Netherlands. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using constant comparative methods, initial and focused coding was applied to the data, which were further labeled into major categories and subcategories, ultimately leading to the identification of key concepts. Triangulation was applied through several reflexivity meetings at different stages of the study.
Results: Twenty-two former intensive care unit patients and 13 relatives were interviewed. The mean age was 53 (standard deviation ± 11.2) and 60% were female. Median intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were 14 days (interquartile range, 9.75-24.5) and 35 days (interquartile range, 21.75-57.25), respectively. Thematic analyses led to identification of seven key concepts, representing barriers and enablers to a positive transition experience. "Existing in a fragmented reality," "being overlooked," and "feeling disqualified" were identified barriers and "feeling empowered," "encountering empathic and expert professionals," "managing recovery expectations," and "family engagement" were identified as enablers for a positive perceived transition experience.Conclusions: Findings of this study suggest that current hospital discharge practice for survivors of critical illness is driven by speed and efficiency, rather than by individual needs assessments, despite advocacies for patient- and family-centered care. Discharge strategies should be customized to facilitate adequate and comprehensive assessment of aftercare needs, conducted at the right time and within the right context, encouraging empowerment and a positive perceived transition from hospital to home.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical illness; patient discharge; patient transfer; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31394924     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201902-156OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  9 in total

1.  Post-Intensive Care Unit Care. A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Priorities and Implications for Redesign.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Jennifer S White; Suman Prinjha; Megan E Hamm; Timothy D Girard; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Charles F Reynolds; Natalie E Leland
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-02

Review 2.  Recovery after Critical Illness and Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Anitha Vijayan; Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Kathleen D Liu; Stuart L Goldstein; Anupam Agarwal; Mark D Okusa; Jorge Cerda
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 10.614

Review 3.  Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Maria M Patarroyo Aponte; Carlos Manrique; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

4.  Recommendations for Hospital-Based Physical Therapists Managing Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Karin M Felten-Barentsz; Roel van Oorsouw; Emily Klooster; Niek Koenders; Femke Driehuis; Erik H J Hulzebos; Marike van der Schaaf; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Philip J van der Wees
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Development of the support needs after ICU (SNAC) questionnaire.

Authors:  Brenda O'Neill; Mark Linden; Pam Ramsay; Alia Darweish Medniuk; Joanne Outtrim; Judy King; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.897

6.  Surviving severe COVID-19: Interviews with patients, informal carers and health professionals.

Authors:  Ana-Carolina Gonçalves; Annabel Williams; Christina Koulouglioti; Todd Leckie; Alexander Hunter; Daniel Fitzpatrick; Alan Richardson; Benjamin Hardy; Richard Venn; Luke Hodgson
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.897

7.  Patients' Adaptations After Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Katrina E Hauschildt; Claire Seigworth; Lee A Kamphuis; Catherine L Hough; Marc Moss; Joanne M McPeake; Molly Harrod; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.207

8.  Optimizing Critical Illness Recovery: Perspectives and Solutions From the Caregivers of ICU Survivors.

Authors:  Carla M Sevin; Leanne M Boehm; Elizabeth Hibbert; Anthony J Bastin; James C Jackson; Joel Meyer; Tara Quasim; Rita N Bakhru; Ashley Montgomery-Yates; Andrew Slack; Mary Still; Giora Netzer; Mark E Mikkelsen; Theodore J Iwashyna; Kimberley J Haines; Joanne McPeake
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Feasibility of a home-based interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: the REACH study.

Authors:  Mel E Major; Daniela Dettling-Ihnenfeldt; Stephan P J Ramaekers; Raoul H H Engelbert; Marike van der Schaaf
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.