Literature DB >> 31394582

[Delphi Expert Consensus of the German Thoracic Surgery Society on the Management of Chest Tube Drainage].

Aris Koryllos1, Stephan Eggeling2, Olaf Schega3, Michael Schweigert4, Gunda Leschber5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest tubes are a valuable instrument and are used on a daily basis - not only by thoracic surgeons but also by a variety of medical specialists who treat pneumothorax or pleural effusions. The goal of the working group of the German Thoracic Society (DGT) was to achieve a consensus on the management of chest tube/drainage using the Delphi process.
METHODS: The assigned group of the DGT designed and conducted two electronic rounds of questions in all major thoracic and lung cancer centres. Consensus was considered as rate of ≥ 75%. After statistical analysis of the results, an expert meeting took place and a final Delphi process poll was used in order to reach consensus for controversial topics.
RESULTS: Thirteen questions on the management of chest tubes were proposed and voted on. A consensus was reached for the following topics: conditions for chest tube insertion, size of drainage/tube, technique of insertion, diagnostic measures after insertion and prior to removal, post-interventional management, documentation, number of chest tubes after anatomical lung resection, use of fibrinolytic agents, type of negative pressure. No consensus was reached for the following topics: autologous blood pleurodesis, reduction of suction in cases of persistent air leakage.
CONCLUSION: Our manuscript depicts the results of a Delphi process in 2017 - 1018 involving experts of the German Thoracic Society from high volume departments certified for thoracic surgery. A very high rate of consensus was documented for topics such as chest tube insertion, peri-interventional management and removal algorithm. The most important topic for which there was no consensus was the case of persistent air leakage. The resulting expert recommendations of the Delphi process could be used as a starting point for internal clinical procedures. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31394582     DOI: 10.1055/a-0963-0404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  1 in total

1.  Single versus double chest drains after pulmonary lobectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinzhi You; Hailing Zhang; Wei Li; Ninghuang Dai; Zhongfeng Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.754

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.