| Literature DB >> 31394374 |
Shaqiu Zhang1, Hong Yang2, Mujeeb Ur Rehman2, Kema Yang3, Mengyi Dong3, Jing Yang3, Mingshu Wang2, Renyong Jia2, Shun Chen2, Mafeng Liu2, Dekang Zhu4, Xinxin Zhao2, Qiao Yang2, Ying Wu2, Ling Zhang2, Yunya Liu2, Yanling Yu2, Bin Tian2, Leichang Pan2, Xiaoyue Chen4, Anchun Cheng5.
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of integrons and associated gene cassettes in Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates from waterfowls in Hainan, China. The antimicrobial resistance profile of the isolates was examined by using disc diffusion test. In addition, PCR, RFLP, plasmid replicon typing and DNA sequencing analyses were used for the characterization of integrase genes (class 1, 2 and 3) and associated gene cassettes. Approximatively, 90% of the isolates were positive for the integrase genes by PCR. Specifically, class 1 and class 2 integrons were found in 252 (81%) and 7 (2.3%) strains, respectively. While 21 (6.7%) isolates were positive for both class 1 and class 2 integrons. However, none of the isolate was positive for the class 3 integrons. In addition, 5 various cassette arrays, dfrA1-orfC, aadA2, aadA1, dfrA1-aadA1, and dfrA1-orfC- aadA1, were found within the variable regions (VRs) of class 1 integron isolates. While only single cassette array, dfrA1-sat2- aadA1, was identified within VRs of class 2 integron isolates. We identified incF plasmid as the most common plasmid type, which was detected in 81 of 243 VRs containing isolates. This study is the first report showing the baseline characteristics of integrons in E. coli isolates from waterfowls in Hainan, China. Our results provide evidence of the waterfowl birds as a reservoir of class 1 and class 2 integrons carrying antibiotic resistance gene cassettes. Therefore, strict preventive measures should be taken to avoid the spread of mobile genetic resistance elements in waterfowls in China.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Gene cassettes; Integrons; Waterfowl birds; incF plasmid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31394374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ISSN: 0147-6513 Impact factor: 6.291