F Carbone1, T Vanuytsel1, J Tack2. 1. Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: jan.tack@med.kuleuven.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Among patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), there is overlap in symptoms between those in the Rome III subgroups of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and those with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). The Rome IV consensus proposed to incorporate all patients with postprandial symptoms into the PDS group. We aimed to evaluate the assessment of meal-related dyspepsia symptoms in patients with FD according to the Rome III vs Rome IV subdivisions. METHODS: Consecutive patients with FD referred for a gastric emptying test (n = 96) were asked to fill out the Rome III gastroduodenal questionnaire, with questions on meal-related occurrence. Study participants underwent a gastric emptying breath test, during which the intensity of dyspeptic symptoms (fullness, bloating, belching, nausea, epigastric pain, and burning) was scored before and up to 4 hours after a meal. We analyzed the association between the Rome subdivision and symptom severity and pattern during the breath test. RESULTS: According to Rome III, 10% had EPS alone, 29% PDS alone, and 61% overlapping EPS and PDS. The frequency of the symptoms reported in the Rome questionnaire associated with the intensity of the symptoms during the breath test in the PDS group and in the groups with PDS and EPS overlap, but not in the group with EPS. We adapted the definition of the PDS subgroup to include patients with meal-related non-PDS symptoms (Rome IV); this reduced the proportion of patients with overlap of EPS and PDS symptoms from 61% to 18% and in this group the association of symptoms with the meal was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients with FD, a meal induced or exacerbated symptoms in most patients. The Rome IV criteria for PDS reduce the proportions categorized as having both PDS and EPS and identify a patient group whose symptoms are associated with the meals. University hospital of Leuven study no: S55426.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Among patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), there is overlap in symptoms between those in the Rome III subgroups of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and those with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). The Rome IV consensus proposed to incorporate all patients with postprandial symptoms into the PDS group. We aimed to evaluate the assessment of meal-related dyspepsia symptoms in patients with FD according to the Rome III vs Rome IV subdivisions. METHODS: Consecutive patients with FD referred for a gastric emptying test (n = 96) were asked to fill out the Rome III gastroduodenal questionnaire, with questions on meal-related occurrence. Study participants underwent a gastric emptying breath test, during which the intensity of dyspeptic symptoms (fullness, bloating, belching, nausea, epigastric pain, and burning) was scored before and up to 4 hours after a meal. We analyzed the association between the Rome subdivision and symptom severity and pattern during the breath test. RESULTS: According to Rome III, 10% had EPS alone, 29% PDS alone, and 61% overlapping EPS and PDS. The frequency of the symptoms reported in the Rome questionnaire associated with the intensity of the symptoms during the breath test in the PDS group and in the groups with PDS and EPS overlap, but not in the group with EPS. We adapted the definition of the PDS subgroup to include patients with meal-related non-PDS symptoms (Rome IV); this reduced the proportion of patients with overlap of EPS and PDS symptoms from 61% to 18% and in this group the association of symptoms with the meal was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients with FD, a meal induced or exacerbated symptoms in most patients. The Rome IV criteria for PDS reduce the proportions categorized as having both PDS and EPS and identify a patient group whose symptoms are associated with the meals. University hospital of Leuven study no: S55426.
Authors: Christopher J Black; Peter A Paine; Anurag Agrawal; Imran Aziz; Maria P Eugenicos; Lesley A Houghton; Pali Hungin; Ross Overshott; Dipesh H Vasant; Sheryl Rudd; Richard C Winning; Maura Corsetti; Alexander C Ford Journal: Gut Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 31.793
Authors: Henry P Parkman; Mark L Van Natta; Alan H Maurer; Kenneth L Koch; Madhusudan Grover; Zubair Malik; Irene Sarosiek; Thomas L Abell; Robert Bulat; Braden Kuo; Robert J Shulman; Gianrico Farrugia; Laura Miriel; James Tonascia; Frank Hamilton; Pankaj J Pasricha; Richard W McCallum Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 4.871
Authors: Lucas Wauters; Ram Dickman; Vasile Drug; Agata Mulak; Jordi Serra; Paul Enck; Jan Tack; Anna Accarino; Giovanni Barbara; Serhat Bor; Benoit Coffin; Maura Corsetti; Heiko De Schepper; Dan Dumitrascu; Adam Farmer; Guillaume Gourcerol; Goran Hauser; Trygve Hausken; George Karamanolis; Daniel Keszthelyi; Carolin Malagelada; Tomislav Milosavljevic; Jean Muris; Colm O'Morain; Athanassos Papathanasopoulos; Daniel Pohl; Diana Rumyantseva; Giovanni Sarnelli; Edoardo Savarino; Jolien Schol; Arkady Sheptulin; Annemieke Smet; Andreas Stengel; Olga Storonova; Martin Storr; Hans Törnblom; Tim Vanuytsel; Monica Velosa; Marek Waluga; Natalia Zarate; Frank Zerbib Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 4.623