Literature DB >> 31394052

Body Composition and Physical Fitness Tests Among US Army Soldiers: A Comparison of the Active and Reserve Components.

Dale W Russell1, Joshua Kazman1,2, Cristel Antonia Russell3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: US Army reserve soldiers and active-duty soldiers differ in their daily work demands and supporting resources, yet research on reservists' health and fitness is lacking. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine whether physical test failure rates and health behaviors differed between active-duty soldiers and reserve soldiers and (2) establish which demographic and health behavioral factors were associated with failing physical tests.
METHODS: We analyzed a sample of 239 329 US Army active-duty and reserve soldiers surveyed from September 2013 through March 2015 using the Global Assessment Tool. We extracted data on soldier demographic characteristics and health behaviors, as well as Body Composition Test (BCT) and Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) results. We compared the 2 groups using the active-to-reserve adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for each variable. We used logistic regression models to determine which variables were associated with failing these tests.
RESULTS: The odds of failing the BCT (aOR = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.78) or the APFT (aOR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.30-0.32) were lower among active-duty soldiers than among reservists, and the odds of doing high levels of high-intensity interval training (aOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.42-1.51), resistance training (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.42-1.48), and vigorous physical activity (aOR = 2.92; 95% CI, 2.86-2.98) were higher among active-duty soldiers than among reservists. The odds of using tobacco (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40), binge drinking alcohol (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09-1.13), having insomnia (aOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.43-1.48) or mild depression (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.48-1.53), and sustaining a physical activity-related injury (aOR = 2.52; 95% CI, 2.47-2.57) were higher among active-duty soldiers than among reservists.
CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers and military leaders could use this information to implement health screenings and tailor health-promotion, intervention, and treatment programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body composition; military; nutrition; physical fitness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31394052      PMCID: PMC6852058          DOI: 10.1177/0033354919867069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  25 in total

1.  Returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan: assessment of readjustment needs of veterans, service members, and their families.

Authors: 
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

3.  Assessment for the U.S. Army Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program: the Global Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Christopher Peterson; Nansook Park; Carl A Castro
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2011-01

4.  Unfit for service: the implications of rising obesity for US military recruitment.

Authors:  John Cawley; Johanna Catherine Maclean
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  U.S. military deployment during 2001-2006: comparison of subjective and objective data sources in a large prospective health study.

Authors:  Besa Smith; Deborah L Wingard; Margaret A K Ryan; Caroline A Macera; Thomas L Patterson; Donald J Slymen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Nutrition as a component of the performance triad: how healthy eating behaviors contribute to soldier performance and military readiness.

Authors:  Dianna L Purvis; Cynthia V Lentino; Theresa K Jackson; Kaitlin J Murphy; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  US Army Med Dep J       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

7.  Human Performance Optimization: Culture Change and Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Patricia A Deuster; Francis G OʼConnor
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Trends in Research with U.S. Military Service Member Participants: A Population-Specific ClinicalTrials.gov Review.

Authors:  Wendy A Cook; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Elizabeth J Bridges
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-04-30

9.  The physical and mental health of a large military cohort: baseline functional health status of the Millennium Cohort.

Authors:  Tyler C Smith; Mark Zamorski; Besa Smith; James R Riddle; Cynthia A Leardmann; Timothy S Wells; Charles C Engel; Charles W Hoge; Joyce Adkins; Dan Blaze
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The Person-Event Data Environment: leveraging big data for studies of psychological strengths in soldiers.

Authors:  Loryana L Vie; Kevin N Griffith; Lawrence M Scheier; Paul B Lester; Martin E P Seligman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.