| Literature DB >> 31392351 |
Cécile Léger1, Nicolas Dupré1, Caroline Aligny1, Magalie Bénard2, Alexis Lebon2, Vincent Henry1, Michelle Hauchecorne1, Ludovic Galas2, Thierry Frebourg1, Philippe Leroux1, Denis Vivien3,4, Maryline Lecointre1, Stéphane Marret1, Bruno J Gonzalez5.
Abstract
During cortex development, fine interactions between pyramidal cells and migrating GABA neurons are required to orchestrate correct positioning of interneurons, but cellular and molecular mechanisms are not yet clearly understood. Functional and age-specific expression of NMDA receptors by neonate endothelial cells suggests a vascular contribution to the trophic role of glutamate during cortical development. Associating functional and loss-of-function approaches, we found that glutamate stimulates activity of the endothelial proteases MMP-9 and t-PA along the pial migratory route (PMR) and radial cortical microvessels. Activation of MMP-9 was NMDAR-dependent and abrogated in t-PA-/- mice. Time-lapse recordings revealed that glutamate stimulated migration of GABA interneurons along vessels through an NMDAR-dependent mechanism. In Gad67-GFP mice, t-PA invalidation and in vivo administration of an MMP inhibitor impaired positioning of GABA interneurons in superficial cortical layers, whereas Grin1 endothelial invalidation resulted in a strong reduction of the thickness of the pial migratory route, a marked decrease of the glutamate-induced MMP-9-like activity along the PMR and a depopulation of interneurons in superficial cortical layers. This study supports that glutamate controls the vessel-associated migration of GABA interneurons by regulating the activity of endothelial proteases. This effect requires endothelial NMDAR and is t-PA-dependent. These neurodevelopmental data reinforce the debate regarding safety of molecules with NMDA-antagonist properties administered to preterm and term neonates.Entities:
Keywords: Endothelial cells; GABA interneuron; MMP-9; Migration; NMDAR; t-PA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31392351 PMCID: PMC7229000 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03248-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci ISSN: 1420-682X Impact factor: 9.261
Statistical analysis
| Experiments | Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Figure | Unpaired | Seven slices from three independent animals | |
| Figure | Chi2 | Seven slices from three independent animal | Chi2, |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Dunnett post-test | ANOVA F 4.733 Dunnett’s | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA F 15.23 Tukey’s Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs MK801 Glut vs Glut + MK | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA F 30.72 Tukey’s Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs SB3CT Glut vs Glut + SB3CT | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA Interaction F 2.793 Treatment F 48.68 Time F 137.8 Tukey’s For Ctrl vs GLUT Glut vs Glut + MK801 For Ctrl vs GLUT Glut vs Glut + MK801 | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA Interaction F 1.538 Treatment F 30.25 Time F 57.17 Tukey’s For Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs Glut + SB3CT For Ctrl vs GLUT Glut vs Glut + SB3CT | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA F 7.638 Tukey’s Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs MK801 Glut vs Glut + MK801 | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA F 5.610 Tukey’s Glut vs PAI Glut vs Glut + MK | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA Interaction F 3.329 Treatment F 33.70 Time F 286.2 Tukey’s For Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs Glu + MK801 For Ctrl vs GLUT Glut vs Glut + MK801 | |
| Figure | Unpaired | WT tPA−/− | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA Interaction F 0.6479 Treatment F 3.818 Time F 32.09 Tukey’s For Ctrl WT vs Glut WT Ctrl tPA−/− vs Glu tPA−/− For Ctrl WT vs Glut WT Ctrl tPA−/− vs Glu tPA−/− | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | Normality controlled using the D’Agostino & Pearson normality test | Radial ANOVA F 33.5 Tukey’s Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs MK Tangential ANOVA F 12.2 Tukey’s Ctrl vs Glut Glut vs MK |
| Figure | Unpaired | Three independent animals studied | Thickness Distance from PMR |
| Figure | Unpaired | WT vs tPA−/− males | |
| Figure | Chi-square test | Chi-square, | |
| Figure | Unpaired | Males Females Males + females | WT vs tPA−/− males WT vs tPA−/− frmales WT vs tPA−/− females + males |
| Figure | Unpaired | Males Females Males + females | Ctrl vs GM6001 males Ctrl vs GM6001 females Ctrl vs males +females |
| Figure | Chi-square test | 5 ROI were analyzed per slice from three animals | Chi-square, |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey’s post-test | PMR ANOVA F 139.7 Tukey’s multiple comparison test WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Layers I–IV ANOVA F 14.55 Tukey’s multiple comparison test WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Layers V–VI ANOVA F 4.213 Tukey’s multiple comparison test WT vs Grin1flox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey’s post-test | ANOVA Interaction Genotype F 32.39, Interaction Layers F 5.87, Tukey’s post-test PMR WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre I–IV WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre V–VI WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre | |
| Figure | One-way ANOVA Tukey’s post-test | ANOVA F 8.309 Tukey’s WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey’s post-test | ANOVA Interaction Genotype F 14.64, Interaction Layers F 2604, Tukey’s post-test Layer I WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Layers II–IV WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Layers V–VI WT vs Grin1flox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre | |
| Figure | Two-way ANOVA Tukey’s post-test | ANOVA Interaction Genotype F 16.79, Interaction Layers F 50.16, Tukey’s post- test Layer I WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Layers II–IV WT vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ Layers V–VI WT vs Grin1flox/VeCadcre Grin1lox/lox/VeCad+/+ vs Grin1lox/lox/VeCadcre | |
| Suppl. Fig. 1f GluN1 Q-RTPCR on microdissected vessels | One-way ANOVA Tukey post-test | ANOVA F 0.2789 Tukey’s Pial vs Subpial Pial vs Deep | |
| Suppl. Fig. 5b Vessel orientation in t-PA−/− | Chi-square test | Seven slices from three animals | Chi-square, |
| Suppl. Fig. 7i Western blot somatostatin in tPA−/− (Suppl Fig. 3j) | Unpaired | Males Females Males + females | WT vs tPA−/− males WT vs tPA−/− females WT vs tPA−/− females + males |
| Suppl. Fig. 7j Primary dendrite density in tPA−/− mice | Unpaired | Males Females Males + females | WT vs tPA−/− males WT vs tPA−/− females WT vs tPA−/− females + males |
| Suppl. Fig. 7k Density of somatostatin cells in tPA−/− mice (Suppl Fig. 3l) | Unpaired | Males Females Males + females | WT vs tPA−/− males WT vs tPA−/− females WT vs tPA−/− females + males |
The tests used, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed for each experiment. Error bars in the graphs represent SEM
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical characterization of the pial migratory route (PMR) in mouse neonates. a, b Low-magnification (a) and high-magnification (b) photographs visualizing cortical microvessels in transversal cortical slices labeled with CD31 antibodies at P2. Arrow heads indicate a thin network of vessels at the level of the PMR. Arrows indicate cortical radial microvessels. c, d Double immunolabeling experiments showing a low-magnification DCX-positive cells (c) lining the PMR (d; arrowhead). Arrows indicate DCX-positive cells stacking at the level of radial microvessels arising from the PMR. e Double immunolabeling experiments showing at high-magnification tangential cells along the PMR immunoreactive for DCX and GABA (arrows). f–h Line scan analysis (f) of the CD31 (red), DCX (blue) and GABA (green) fluorescent signals acquired from a cultured brain slice at P2 (g). Intensity profiles (h) indicate that DCX and GABA immunofluorescences overlap and border the inner part of pial vessels. i Confocal acquisition of GABA-immunoreactive cells and CD31-labeled microvessels in the developing neocortex at P2. Note a marked vascular interaction of GABA interneurons along radial microvessels. j Quantification of vessel density (upper panel) and vessel-associated GABAergic interneurons in the superficial (middle) and deep (lower panel) cortical layers at P2. Note that the vessel association is preferentially observed in the developing superficial layers. ns not statistically different vs superficial layers. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 2GluN1 immunoreactivity in microvessels from the pial migratory route (PMR) and glutamate-dependent regulation of MMP-9 activity. a–d Double immunolabeling experiments showing CD31-positive microvessels and GluN1 immunoreactivity in the neocortex of P2 mice. Immunohistochemistry reveals numerous GluN1-positive cortical radial fibers (a; arrows) and GluN1-positive endothelial cells in the pial migratory route (b–d; arrowheads). e–g Double immunolabeling experiments showing CD31-positive microvessels (e) and MMP-9 immunoreactivity (f) in vessels from the pial migratory route. The overlay (g) indicates that MMP-9 immunoreactivity mainly co-localizes with endothelial cells present in the inner part of the migratory route (arrows). h Quantification by gel zymography of the effects of 6-h exposure of P2 cortical slices to graded concentrations (25–100 µM) of glutamate on MMP-9 activity. i Quantification by gel zymography of the effect of the NMDA-antagonist MK801 (20 µM) on the glutamate-induced increase of MMP-9 activity. j Quantification by gel zymography of the effect of the MMP-9 inhibitor SB-3CT (10 µM) on the glutamate-induced increase of MMP-9 activity. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs control and ##p < 0.01; ###p < 0.001; ####p < 0.0001 vs glutamate. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 3In situ characterization of the effects of glutamate on MMP activity in vessels from the pial migratory route. a–c In situ zymography performed for P2 cortical slices visualizing the MMP gelatinase activity in control conditions after 60-min incubation with the quenched fluorogenic substrate DQ-gelatin-FITC. Note that the gelatinase activity (a) overlaps with microvessels present in the pial migratory route labeled with isolectin-TRITC (b, c). d–g Microphotographs acquired by videomicroscopy show a time-dependent increase of the gelatinase activity in cultured slices incubated with glutamate (100 µM) from 0 to 90 min. Note that in addition to the PMR (arrowheads), a fluorescent signal also progressively appeared in radial cortical vessels (arrows; f, g). h Time-lapse quantification by videomicroscopy of the fluorescence intensity resulting from DQ-gelatin-FITC cleavage after treatment of brain slices with aCSF (Ctrl), glutamate (100 µM), and the NMDA-antagonist MK801 (20 µM) alone or co-incubated (h). i Quantification by videomicroscopy of the fluorescence intensity resulting from DQ-gelatin-FITC cleavage after treatment of brain slices with aCSF (Ctrl), glutamate (100 µM), and the MMP2/9 inhibitor SB-3CT (10 µM) alone or co-incubated. Statistical analysis revealed significant Time and Treatment interactions. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 vs control at the same time point and ####p < 0.0001 vs glutamate at the same time point. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 4Visualization and quantification of the effects of glutamate on t-PA activity in vessels from the pial migratory route. a Triple labeling visualizing t-PA, collagen IV, and microvessels in the pial migratory route. Note the presence of strong vascular t-PA immunoreactivity in both tangential and radial cortical vessels (arrows). b Quantification by gel zymography of the effects of aCSF (Ctrl), glutamate (100 µM), and the NMDA-antagonist MK801 (20 µM) alone or co-incubated on t-PA activity after 3-h treatment of P2 cortical slices. c Quantification by gel zymography of the effects of aCSF (Ctrl), glutamate (100 µM), and the t-PA inhibitor PAI-1 (5 µg/mL) alone or co-incubated on t-PA activity after 3-h treatment of P2 cortical slices. d–f Microphotographs acquired by in situ zymography and visualizing cortical microvessels (d) and the fluorescent signal resulting from the cleavage of the quenched casein-FITC substrate (e) in cultured P2 cortical slices. Overlay reveals a strong protease activity associated with the pial migratory route (arrowheads) and radial cortical microvessels (arrows, f). g Quantification by time-lapse videomicroscopy of the fluorescence intensity resulting in casein-FITC cleavage after incubation of P2 brain slices with aCSF (Ctrl), glutamate (100 µM), and MK801 (20 µM) alone or co-incubated. h Quantification by gel zymography of the effects of glutamate (100 µM) on MMP-9 activity in P2 cortical extracts from wild-type (WT) and t-PA−/− mice. i Quantification by in situ zymography of the effects of glutamate (100 µM) on the cleavage of the quenched casein-FITC substrate in WT and t-PA−/− mice at the level of the pial migratory route in P2 cortical slices. Statistical analysis revealed significant Time and Treatment interactions. ns not significant; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 vs control and ####p < 0.0001 vs glutamate. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of cells tracked per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 5Effects of glutamate and MK801 on the vessel-associated migration of GABA interneurons. a 3D Imaris modeling of migrating interneurons along radial microvessels in Gad67-GFP mice at P2. GFP-positive neurons were visualized by immunohistochemistry and microvessels labeled with CD31 antibodies. b–d Microphotographs acquired from the same cultured slice at different times of tracking (0 min, b; 60 min, c; and 150 min, d). Arrows indicate migrating cells along microvessels. Arrowheads indicate immobile large cells. e Stacked graph visualizing the position of several cells during 6-h video-tracking. f Quantification of the distance covered by the four cells identified in e. g Effects of glutamate (50 µM) and MK801 (20 µM) on the migration speed of cells moving tangentially and radially along microvessels. **p < 0.01 vs control and ###p < 0.001 vs glutamate. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 6Effects of t-PA invalidation and in vivo GM6001 exposure on the cortical positioning and the spine morphology of GABA interneurons populating the superficial cortical layers. a–e Visualization of GABA interneurons (a–c) and microvessels (b, d) in P2 cortical slices from wild-type (a, b) and t-PA null (c, d) mice. Note the reduction of the PMR thickness (b, d, e, upper panel) and the reduced distance of GABA interneurons from the PMR (b, d, e, lower panel) in t-PA null mice. f Visualization of a Gad67-GFP neuron presenting dendritic spines in the superficial cortical layers of a wild-type mouse at P15. g Illustration of a graphic design obtained after spine analysis performed with the Filament tracer tool from the Imaris software. Three spine subtypes were analyzed: filopodia (Filo), mushrooms (Mush), and stubbies (Stub). Fiber is colored in red, mushrooms, and filopodia in blue, stubby in purple. h, i Quantification of the spine density (h) and the distribution of spine subtypes (i) in wild-type and t-PA−/− mice at P15. j Quantification of the locomotor activity of wild-type and t-PA−/− mice at P15. k–m Visualization (k, l) and quantification (m) of the positioning of Gad67-GFP neurons at P15 in control (k, m) and in vivo-exposed mice to the MMP inhibitor GM6001 (10 mg/kg; l, m). Note the presence of numerous ectopic cells in deep layers (l; arrows). n Quantification of the distribution of Gad67-GFP neurons between superficial and deep cortical layers in control and GM6001-treated mice. ns not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 vs wild-type or control mice. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 7Effects of endothelial GluN1 invalidation on the pial migratory route and on the positioning of GABA interneurons. a, b Gene identity maps of floxed Grin1 and VE-Cadherin-Cre transgenic mice (a) used to generate Grin1/VeCad transgenic mice (b; left panel). The endothelial expression of the Cre recombinase was controlled by immunohistochemistry (b; right panel). c Double immunohistochemistry experiments visualizing microvessels and GABA interneurons in the developing cortex of wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+; left panel), Grin1/VeCad+ (middle panel), and Grin1/VeCad (right panel) mice at birth (P0). d, e Quantification of the thickness of the PMR, the developing superficial cortical layers (I–IV; d) and of the GABA interneuron density (e) in wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+), Grin1/VeCad+, and Grin1/VeCad mice at birth. f Quantification by videomicroscopy of the effect of glutamate (100 µM) on the MMP-9-like activity in cortical slices from wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+), Grin1/VeCad+, and Grin1/VeCad mice. Images of the in situ zymographies are provided in Supplementary Fig. 8. g–i Visualization at low magnification of the positioning of Gad67-positive neurons in the neocortex of adult wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+; g), Grin1/VeCad+ (h) and Grin1/VeCad (i) mice. Note a depopulation of Gad67-immunoreactive cells in the superficial cortical layers in Grin1/VeCad mice. j Quantification of the thickness of the layer I, superficial layers II–IV and deep layers V–VI in adult wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+), Grin1/VeCad+, and Grin1/VeCad mice. k Quantification of the density of Gad-immunoreactive cells in the layer I, superficial layers II–IV and deep layers V–VI in adult wild-type (Grin1+/VeCad+), Grin1/VeCad+, and Grin1/VeCad mice. ns not significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 vs wild-type mice. #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01; ####p < 0.0001 vs Grin1/VeCad+. The tests used for the statistical analysis, the number of independent experiments, the number of measures per experiment, and p values are detailed in Table 1
Fig. 8Graphical abstract integrating highlights from the present study and several studies from the literature positioning the contribution of the endothelial NMDA receptor in the regulation of MMP-9 activity and the vessel-associated migration of GABA interneuron arising from the PMR. Highlights are described and classified by graphical items. Data from the literature are mentioned by numbers in brackets which refer to the reference list of the main manuscript