Literature DB >> 31392056

Frequency and prognostic significance of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic literature review.

Audra N Boscoe1, Catherine Rolland2, Robin Kate Kelley3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recognition of distinct molecular subgroups within cholangiocarcinoma (CC), along with the increasing availability of targeted therapies, suggests that further characterization of the prevalence and prognosis of frequently occurring subgroups may assist with the development of more effective treatment approaches for the management of CC. A systematic review was performed to investigate the prevalence of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations (mIDH1) in patients with CC, the possible clinical and prognostic significance of mIDH1, and the presence of co-mutations in tumors with mIDH1.
METHODS: This review was conducted using the Cochrane dual-reviewer methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches were performed in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Trials Register and Database of Systematic Reviews, and other Cochrane Library assets using terms for CC and mIDH1 with no language or date restrictions for articles published up to December 31, 2017. Searches were also performed of abstracts presented at the following conferences in 2016 and 2017: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), ASCO-Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (ASCO-GI), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), and ESMO-Asia. Screening was performed separately by two reviewers and cross-checked. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved by a senior researcher. Data from all selected references were recorded in a data extraction grid.
RESULTS: A total of 46 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Of these publications, 45 reported the frequency of mIDH1 among a total sample of 5,393 patients with CC. mIDH1 was enriched in intrahepatic CC (ICC), with 552 (13.1%; 95% CI, 12.1-14.2) of the 4,214 patients with ICC having the mutation compared with 9 (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5%) of the 1,123 patients with extrahepatic CC (ECC). The percentage of females with mIDH1 CC (66.2%; 95% CI, 57.7-73.7%) was higher than in the overall CC population (44.4%). The frequency of mIDH1 in patients with ICC reported in individual studies ranged from 4.5-55.6%, and a significantly higher frequency was reported in non-Asian centers compared with Asian centers (weighted mean, 16.5% vs. 8.8%; P<0.001). The prevalence of mIDH1 in patients with ICC at USA centers was 18.0% (95% CI, 16.4-19.8%). Eleven publications reported the prevalence of co-mutations in patients with mIDH1 ICC, with the most frequent being AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) (22.0%), BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) (15.5%), and PBRM1 (13.3%). Eight publications investigated the possible prognostic significance of mIDH1. None of the studies reported a statistically significant association between mIDH1 and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or time to progression.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review substantiates the prevalence of mIDH1 in CC and further characterizes clinical, pathologic, and genetic covariates within this sub-population. Co-mutation data may inform future studies of mechanisms of response and resistance to mIDH1-targeted therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholangiocarcinoma (CC); clinical prognosis; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1); prevalence; systematic review

Year:  2019        PMID: 31392056      PMCID: PMC6657309          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.03.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  60 in total

1.  Cholangiocarcinoma: expanding the spectrum of risk factors.

Authors:  Diaa H Elfaki; Andrea A Gossard; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2009-01-14

2.  Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Lenny Dang; David W White; Stefan Gross; Bryson D Bennett; Mark A Bittinger; Edward M Driggers; Valeria R Fantin; Hyun Gyung Jang; Shengfang Jin; Marie C Keenan; Kevin M Marks; Robert M Prins; Patrick S Ward; Katharine E Yen; Linda M Liau; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Shinsan M Su
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

4.  Trends in survival after surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: a 30-year population-based SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; John L Cameron; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome.

Authors:  Elaine R Mardis; Li Ding; David J Dooling; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; Ken Chen; Daniel C Koboldt; Robert S Fulton; Kim D Delehaunty; Sean D McGrath; Lucinda A Fulton; Devin P Locke; Vincent J Magrini; Rachel M Abbott; Tammi L Vickery; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Todd Wylie; Scott M Smith; Lynn Carmichael; James M Eldred; Christopher C Harris; Jason Walker; Joshua B Peck; Feiyu Du; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Anthony M Brummett; Eric Clark; Joshua F McMichael; Rick J Meyer; Jonathan K Schindler; Craig S Pohl; John W Wallis; Xiaoqi Shi; Ling Lin; Heather Schmidt; Yuzhu Tang; Carrie Haipek; Madeline E Wiechert; Jolynda V Ivy; Joelle Kalicki; Glendoria Elliott; Rhonda E Ries; Jacqueline E Payton; Peter Westervelt; Michael H Tomasson; Mark A Watson; Jack Baty; Sharon Heath; William D Shannon; Rakesh Nagarajan; Daniel C Link; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert; John F DiPersio; Richard K Wilson; Timothy J Ley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Rising trends in cholangiocarcinoma: is the ICD classification system misleading us?

Authors:  Shahid A Khan; Shireen Emadossadaty; Nimzing G Ladep; Howard C Thomas; Paul Elliott; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mireille B Toledano
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Patrick S Ward; Jay Patel; David R Wise; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Bryson D Bennett; Hilary A Coller; Justin R Cross; Valeria R Fantin; Cyrus V Hedvat; Alexander E Perl; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Martin Carroll; Shinsan M Su; Kim A Sharp; Ross L Levine; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 38.585

8.  Acute myeloid leukemia with IDH1 or IDH2 mutation: frequency and clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Keyur P Patel; Farhad Ravandi; Deqin Ma; Abhaya Paladugu; Bedia A Barkoh; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.400

9.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours.

Authors:  M Fernanda Amary; Krisztian Bacsi; Francesca Maggiani; Stephen Damato; Dina Halai; Fitim Berisha; Robin Pollock; Paul O'Donnell; Anita Grigoriadis; Tim Diss; Malihe Eskandarpour; Nadège Presneau; Pancras Cw Hogendoorn; Andrew Futreal; Roberto Tirabosco; Adrienne M Flanagan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 9.883

10.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas.

Authors:  Hai Yan; D Williams Parsons; Genglin Jin; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Weishi Yuan; Ivan Kos; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Siân Jones; Gregory J Riggins; Henry Friedman; Allan Friedman; David Reardon; James Herndon; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  28 in total

1.  Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study.

Authors:  Maeve A Lowery; Howard A Burris; Filip Janku; Rachna T Shroff; James M Cleary; Nilofer S Azad; Lipika Goyal; Elizabeth A Maher; Lia Gore; Antoine Hollebecque; Muralidhar Beeram; Jonathan C Trent; Liewen Jiang; Bin Fan; Elia Aguado-Fraile; Sung Choe; Bin Wu; Camelia Gliser; Samuel V Agresta; Shuchi S Pandya; Andrew X Zhu; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 2.  Cholangiocarcinoma: An Emerging Target for Molecular Therapy.

Authors:  Ilya Tsimafeyeu; Mark Temper
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2021-07-21

3.  Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis.

Authors:  Margherita Rimini; Valentina Burgio; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Lorenza Rimassa; Ester Oneda; Daniele Lavacchi; Nicola Personeni; Francesca Ratti; Federica Pedica; Angelo Della Corte; Mara Persano; Francesco De Cobelli; Luca Aldrighetti; Mario Scartozzi; Stefano Cascinu; Andrea Casadei-Gardini
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.864

4.  FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation.

Authors:  Sandra J Casak; Shan Pradhan; Lola A Fashoyin-Aje; Yi Ren; Yuan-Li Shen; Yuan Xu; Edwin Chiu Yuen Chow; Ye Xiong; Jeanne Fourie Zirklelbach; Jiang Liu; Rosane Charlab; William F Pierce; Nataliya Fesenko; Julia A Beaver; Richard Pazdur; Paul G Kluetz; Steven J Lemery
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 5.  The implications of IDH mutations for cancer development and therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Pirozzi; Hai Yan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Broadening the therapeutic horizon of advanced biliary tract cancer through molecular characterisation.

Authors:  Avani Athauda; Caroline Fong; David K Lau; Milind Javle; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Chigusa Morizane; Keith Steward; Ian Chau
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Teresa Macarulla; Milind M Javle; Robin K Kelley; Sam J Lubner; Jorge Adeva; James M Cleary; Daniel V Catenacci; Mitesh J Borad; John Bridgewater; William P Harris; Adrian G Murphy; Do-Youn Oh; Jonathan Whisenant; Maeve A Lowery; Lipika Goyal; Rachna T Shroff; Anthony B El-Khoueiry; Bin Fan; Bin Wu; Christina X Chamberlain; Liewen Jiang; Camelia Gliser; Shuchi S Pandya; Juan W Valle; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Burden of illness for patients with cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a retrospective claims analysis.

Authors:  Christina X Chamberlain; Elizabeth Faust; Debbie Goldschmidt; Nathan Webster; Audra N Boscoe; Dendy Macaulay; Mary Linton Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

9.  New era with the genetic assessment for biliary tree cancers beyond the anatomical assessment alone.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 10.  ARID1A Variations in Cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical Significances and Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Shankun Zhao; Youwen Xu; Weizhou Wu; Pan Wang; Yichao Wang; Hao Jiang; Jie Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.