| Literature DB >> 31392033 |
John P Barton1,2, Erasha Rajkoomar3, Jaclyn K Mann3, Dariusz K Murakowski1, Mako Toyoda4, Macdonald Mahiti4, Phillip Mwimanzi4, Takamasa Ueno4,5, Arup K Chakraborty1,2, Thumbi Ndung'u2,3,6,7.
Abstract
An effective vaccine is urgently required to curb the HIV-1 epidemic. We have previously described an approach to model the fitness landscape of several HIV-1 proteins, and have validated the results against experimental and clinical data. The fitness landscape may be used to identify mutation patterns harmful to virus viability, and consequently inform the design of immunogens that can target such regions for immunological control. Here we apply such an analysis and complementary experiments to HIV-1 Nef, a multifunctional protein which plays a key role in HIV-1 pathogenesis. We measured Nef-driven replication capacities as well as Nef-mediated CD4 and HLA-I down-modulation capacities of thirty-two different Nef mutants, and tested model predictions against these results. Furthermore, we evaluated the models using 448 patient-derived Nef sequences for which several Nef activities were previously measured. Model predictions correlated significantly with Nef-driven replication and CD4 down-modulation capacities, but not HLA-I down-modulation capacities, of the various Nef mutants. Similarly, in our analysis of patient-derived Nef sequences, CD4 down-modulation capacity correlated the most significantly with model predictions, suggesting that of the tested Nef functions, this is the most important in vivo. Overall, our results highlight how the fitness landscape inferred from patient-derived sequences captures, at least in part, the in vivo functional effects of mutations to Nef. However, the correlation between predictions of the fitness landscape and measured parameters of Nef function is not as accurate as the correlation observed in past studies for other proteins. This may be because of the additional complexity associated with inferring the cost of mutations on the diverse functions of Nef.Entities:
Keywords: HIV Nef; HIV evolution; HIV vaccine; computational model; fitness landscape
Year: 2019 PMID: 31392033 PMCID: PMC6680064 DOI: 10.1093/ve/vez029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virus Evol ISSN: 2057-1577
Energies, predicted by the Ising and Potts models, of the selected mutants.
| Mutant | Ising | Potts | Required for down-modulation of | HLA-association/known CTL escape |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17K19K | 6.45 | 7.54 | HLA and to a lesser extent CD4 ( | |
| 21E | 0.89 | 2.57 | ||
| 21K | 0.89 | 1.55 | ||
| 28E | 0.22 | 0.51 | C*08:02 | |
| 33A | 0.72 | 0.65 | A*68:01; 33V is a known escape mutant ( | |
| 43L | 1.67 | 1.89 | 43V with C*03 | |
| 33A43L | 2.02 | 2.11 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 57G | 4.63 | 6.25 | CD4 ( | |
| 57R | 4.63 | 5.53 | CD4 ( | |
| 57R58P | 7.44 | 8.32 | CD4 ( | |
| 71K | 1.63 | 1.81 | C*07:02; 71T with B*07:02; 71T and 71R are known escape mutants ( | |
| 72L75L | 11.75 | 12.77 | HLA ( | |
| 76V | 3.51 | 3.65 | B*81; C*18:01; 76V, 76T, 76I are known escape mutants ( | |
| 71K76V | 5.14 | 5.47 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 80N | 3.58 | 4.30 | B*07:02 | |
| 76V80N | 7.10 | 7.95 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 80D | 3.58 | 4.37 | B*35:01; C*07:02 | |
| 88G | 3.99 | 4.32 | Known escape mutant ( | |
| 43L88G | 5.63 | 6.17 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 102H | 0.31 | 0.60 | B*44:03; C*08 | |
| 28E102H | 0.61 | 1.17 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 102W | 0.31 | 1.85 | ||
| 28E102W | 0.61 | 2.41 | ||
| 123G | 6.05 | 6.84 | HLA and CD4 ( | |
| 133T | −0.11 | 0.47 | B*35:01; 133I with B*38:01 and B*57 | |
| 135F | 1.15 | 1.20 | A*23:01; A*24. A known escape mutant ( | |
| 133T135F | 0.64 | 1.20 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 143Y | 2.93 | 2.90 | A*23:01 | |
| 135F143Y | 4.16 | 4.18 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations | |
| 188H | 1.34 | 2.40 | A*31:01; 188R with B*58:01; 188S with A*30:01; 188N is a known escape mutant ( | |
| 192R | 1.45 | 1.74 | 192K with A*74. A known escape mutant ( | |
| 188H192R | 2.40 | 3.82 | Pair of HLA-associated mutations |
All mutants chosen represent the most common mutation at the corresponding residue with the exception of the additional mutations chosen to test the ability of the Potts model to distinguish between different amino acids at the same codon.
The energies were computed for the mutations in the consensus B sequence background, where the sequence differences (A15T, T51N, C163S, Q170L, and K178R) from the multiple sequence alignment (MSA) consensus sequence were considered as additional mutations.
Lists of HLA-associated polymorphisms in Nef were derived from Carlson et al. (2012, 2014). Mutations which are known CTL escape are referenced.
Mutations chosen to test the ability of the Potts model to distinguish between different amino acids at the same codon.
In vitro measurements of the replication capacities, CD4 down-modulation capacities and HLA-I down-modulation capacities of the thirty-two selected mutants.
| Mutant | Ising | Potts | Replication capacity | CD4 down-modulation | HLA-I down-modulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17K19K | 6.45 | 7.54 | 0.261 | 1.013 | 0.944 |
| 21E | 0.89 | 2.57 | 1.464 | 1.017 | 0.977 |
| 21K | 0.89 | 1.55 | 0.515 | 1.014 | 0.961 |
| 28E | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.851 | 0.991 | 0.977 |
| 33A | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.293 | 1.002 | 1.005 |
| 43L | 1.67 | 1.89 | 0.694 | 0.972 | 1.038 |
| 33A43L | 2.02 | 2.11 | 0.881 | 0.980 | 0.982 |
| 57G | 4.63 | 6.25 | 0.009 | 0.138 | 1.003 |
| 57R | 4.63 | 5.53 | 0.008 | 0.511 | 1.017 |
| 57R58P | 7.44 | 8.32 | 0.001 | 0.220 | 1.026 |
| 71K | 1.63 | 1.81 | 0.854 | 1.002 | 0.972 |
| 72L75L | 11.75 | 12.77 | 0.075 | 0.653 | 0.540 |
| 76V | 3.51 | 3.65 | 0.843 | 1.006 | 0.931 |
| 71K76V | 5.14 | 5.47 | 1.065 | 1.026 | 0.937 |
| 80N | 3.58 | 4.30 | 0.832 | 0.965 | 1.006 |
| 76V80N | 7.10 | 7.95 | 0.531 | 0.966 | 0.868 |
| 80D | 3.58 | 4.37 | 0.186 | 0.900 | 0.966 |
| 88G | 3.99 | 4.32 | 0.870 | 0.997 | 0.941 |
| 43L88G | 5.63 | 6.17 | 0.916 | 0.947 | 0.964 |
| 102H | 0.31 | 0.60 | 0.466 | 0.970 | 0.887 |
| 28E102H | 0.61 | 1.17 | 1.394 | No result | No result |
| 102W | 0.31 | 1.85 | 0.754 | 1.008 | 0.804 |
| 28E102W | 0.61 | 2.41 | 0.829 | 1.002 | 0.986 |
| 123G | 6.05 | 6.84 | 0.064 | 0.287 | 0.320 |
| 133T | −0.11 | 0.47 | 0.599 | 0.994 | 0.907 |
| 135F | 1.15 | 1.20 | 1.143 | 1.003 | 0.974 |
| 133T135F | 0.64 | 1.20 | 1.463 | 1.003 | 0.967 |
| 143Y | 2.93 | 2.90 | 0.941 | 0.978 | 0.990 |
| 135F143Y | 4.16 | 4.18 | 1.034 | 0.973 | 0.961 |
| 188H | 1.34 | 2.40 | 0.689 | 0.989 | 0.970 |
| 192R | 1.45 | 1.74 | No result | 1.008 | 0.985 |
| 188H192R | 2.40 | 3.82 | 0.560 | 0.995 | 0.968 |
Replication capacities, CD4 down-modulation capacities, and HLA-I down-modulation capacities are expressed relative to that of the wild-type LANL consensus B Nef.
Escape or HLA-associated mutations (see Table 1 for further details).
These results were unobtainable due to unsuccessful cloning of mutants 192R into the NL4-3 plasmid and 28E102H into the pSELECT plasmid.
Figure 1.E values are negatively correlated with in vitro functional capacity of mutant viruses. Error bars in all panels denote the range of values obtained from experimental replicates. (A) Spearman rank correlation between replication capacities (RC) of mutant viruses and Potts model E values (S = 0.9). RC of the mutant viruses is normalised relative to the wild-type virus. (B) Spearman rank correlation between CD4 down-modulation capability and E values. (C) Spearman rank correlation between HLA down-modulation capability and E values. The correlation between HLA down-modulation capability and E values is weak, but few mutant Nef sequences display significant impairment of HLA down-modulation.
Figure 2.Representation of the flow cytometric measurements of Nef-mediated CD4 and HLA-I down-modulation. Graphs show the HLA-A*02 and CD4 cell surface expression on the Y-axis and green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression is indicated on the X-axis of graphs. GFP-positive cells represent cells successfully transfected with the Nef clones. HLA-A*02 and CD4 cell surface expression was measured in GFP-positive cells. (A, B) The HLA-A*02 (A) and CD4 (B) down-modulation ability of the negative control (ΔNef) is shown. The negative control represents 0 per cent down-modulation ability. (C, D) The HLA-A*02 (C) and CD4 (D) down-modulation ability of the positive control (SF2 Nef) is shown. The positive control represents 100 per cent down-modulation ability. (E, F) Graphs depict intermediate HLA down-modulation capacity (E) and CD4 down-modulation capacity by mutant 72L75L (F).
Figure 3.Relationships between in vitro Nef-mediated CD4 and HLA-I down-modulation capacities of mutant Nef clones and E values. (A) We find that viruses with impaired CD4 down-modulation capacities (<80% of reference) have significantly higher E values. (B) Viruses with impaired HLA-I down-modulation capacities also have higher E values, but this correlation falls below the threshold of significance. Nef-mediated CD4 and HLA-I down-modulation capacities of the mutant Nef clones were normalised to that of the wild-type LANL consensus B Nef. Here we show comparisons with Ising model (S = 0) energies, which are consistent with results for more complex models (see Supplementary Fig. S3E and F). (C) Pairwise comparisons between replication capacity, CD4 down-modulation, and HLA-I down-modulation are shown, together with Spearman correlations. Note that all viruses with substantially impaired ability to down-modulate CD4 or HLA also have low replication capacities.
Figure 4.Relationships between in vitro Nef-mediated CD4 and HLA-I down-modulation capacities of natural subtype C Nef sequences and E values. (A) Energy values both Ising and Potts model energies are significantly negatively correlated with CD4 down-modulation. Note that energies shown here are derived from models trained on subtype C sequence data. (B) Correlation between energies and HLA-I down-modulation capacities are weaker than for CD4 down-modulation.
Multiple linear regression of normalised functional measurements against Ising and Potts model E for natural subtype B sequences.
| Predictor | Coefficient (Ising) |
| Coefficient (Potts, |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4 down-modulation | −0.492 | 0.002 | −0.549 | 0.001 |
| HLA down-modulation | −0.015 | 0.895 | 0.061 | 0.586 |
| CXCR4 down-modulation | −0.111 | 0.452 | −0.049 | 0.739 |
| CCR5 down-modulation | 0.093 | 0.647 | 0.098 | 0.627 |
| CD74 upregulation | 0.266 | 0.022 | 0.269 | 0.020 |
| Infectivity | −0.151 | 0.206 | −0.181 | 0.130 |
| Replication capacity | 0.008 | 0.945 | 0.008 | 0.944 |