Literature DB >> 31391988

Crystal structure of 7,8,15,16,17-penta-thiadi-spiro-[5.2.59.36]hepta-deca-ne.

Robert Hofstetter1, Benedict J Elvers2, Felix Potlitz1, Andreas Link1, Carola Schulzke2.   

Abstract

The title compound, C12H20S5, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c with four mol-ecules in the unit cell. In the crystal, the asymmetric unit comprises the entire mol-ecule with the three cyclic moieties arranged in a line. The mol-ecules in the unit cell pack in a parallel fashion, with their longitudinal axes arranged along a uniform direction. The packing is stabilized by the one-dimensional propagation of non-classical hydrogen-bonding contacts between the central sulfur atom of the S3 fragment and the C-H of a cyclo-hexyl group from a glide-related mol-ecule [C⋯S = 3.787 (2) Å].

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; lenthio­nine derivative; spiro compounds; sulfur-rich heterocycles

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391988      PMCID: PMC6658967          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Cyclic polysulfides comprise a subgroup of pharmacologically inter­esting organosulfur compounds that – depending on constitution and conformation – have been shown to exert specific anti­bacterial, anti­fungal, allelopathic and cytotoxic activity (Davison & Sperry, 2017 ▸), as well as a plethora of H2S-mediated effects relying on H2S formation (Szabo & Papapetropoulos, 2017 ▸). The benefits imparted by these compounds have led to the evolution of synthetic pathways in many natural products, as well as organoleptic detection mechanisms in organisms confronted by them, including the senses of smell and taste in humans. Thus, volatile organic polysulfanes are among the most odorous compounds in natural products, including meat (Zhao et al., 2019 ▸), plants (Liang et al., 2017 ▸), and algae (Block et al., 2017 ▸). In fungi, 1,2,4-tri­thiol­ane, 1,2,4,6-tetra­thiepane, and 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexa­thiepane have been found to contribute to the unique aroma of shiitake (Lentnius edodes), but it is 1,2,3,5,6-penta­thiepane (lenthio­nine) that combines the most potent biological (anti­bacterial, anti­fungal, and anti-coagulative) and sensory activity (Davison & Sperry, 2017 ▸). Structural characterizations of this type of compounds are rather rare. The very few reports available in the literature include the crystal structures of penta­thiepanes featuring two vicinal carbon atoms (Sugihara et al., 1999 ▸). The conformational study of the title compound, 7,8,15,16,17-penta­thiadi­spiro­[5.2.59.36]hepta­dec­ane (C12H20S5), is supposed to aid in the elucidation of the mechanism of action by which naturally occurring and synthetic penta­thiepanes exert potent activity (Behnisch-Cornwell et al., 2019 ▸) and to advance the application of lenthio­nine derivatives for medical and material purposes (Tanagi et al., 2019 ▸).

Structural commentary

The title compound 7,8,15,16,17-penta­thiadi­spiro­[5.2.59.36]hepta­decane, C12H20S5, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c. The mol­ecule constitutes the asymmetric unit while Z =4. The title compound consists of three rings in a corner-sharing juxtaposed arrangement (Fig. 1 ▸). The two outer cyclo­hexyl rings are both in a typical, rather unremarkable, chair conformation. They are connected to the central ring via spiro carbon atoms, which are tethered to each other by one S2 and one S3 moiety, thereby forming the central seven-membered ring. Crystal structures of such heterocyclic rings bearing five sulfur atoms in groups of two and three plus two carbon atoms are extremely rare, with only one example being available to date (Mloston et al., 2002 ▸; refcode: MOSYOI in the CSD, version 5.40, March 2019; Groom et al., 2016 ▸). In MOSYOI, the cyclo­hexyl substituents of this structure are replaced by 2,2,4,4-tetra­methyl­cyclo­butan-1-one moieties. The arrangement of the seven atoms of the central ring appears to be quite inflexible, at least in the solid state, as emphasized by an overlay of the two structures (Fig. 2 ▸), which shows distances of the overlayed atoms all well below 0.1 Å and an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0846 Å. Considering that the four-membered and heavily substituted rings in MOSYOI (Mloston et al., 2002 ▸) are much more strained than the cyclo­hexane rings in the title compound, the conserved conformation of the central ring points towards the observed arrangement being thermodynamically rather favorable. In the context of investigating these compounds as pharmaceutical leads, such highly conserved structural motives are quite beneficial. The mean planes of the two cyclo­hexane rings, calculated from the positions of the six carbon atoms (Mercury software; Macrae et al., 2006 ▸), enclose an angle of 21.96 (9)°, i.e. the two rings are not coplanar. The angles between the plane calculated from the positions of all seven atoms of the central ring and both cyclo­hexane-derived planes are 82.90 (5)° (C1 → C6) and 76.79 (5)° (C7 → C12), which are both close to perpendicular. This is similar in MOSYOI, with the four-membered rings being nearly perpendicular to the central seven-membered ring. The sulfursulfur bond distances range from 2.026 (1) to 2.035 (1) Å, which is a little bit shorter than the sum of the covalent radii of 2.06 Å (Pyykkö & Atsumi, 2009 ▸). The shortest S—S distance is between the two sulfur atoms of the S2 moiety, while the S3 moiety is slightly unsymmetrical [2.028 (1) and 2.035 (1) Å]. The shorter S—S bond in the S3 moiety is the one that points towards a non-classical hydrogen-bonding contact (vide infra), implying that this inter­action might influence the relative distances in the S3 fragment. The angles involving central S atoms range from 105.16 (5)° (around S1) to 106.89 (5)° (around S3) while the S—C—S angles are slightly wider with 111.58 (7)° (around C1) and 114.31 (7)° (around C7), i.e. they are more and less acute, respectively, than the ideal tetra­hedral angle.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of 7,8,15,16,17-penta­thiadi­spiro­[5.2.59.36]hepta­decane. Ellipsoids are shown at the 50% level.

Figure 2

An overlay (Mercury; Macrae et al., 2006 ▸) of 7,8,15,16,17-penta­thiadi­spiro­[5.2.59.36]hepta­decane (yellow) and the related structure from the CSD (blue, CSD refcode: MOSYOI; Mloston et al., 2002 ▸). Only the atom labels for the title compound are shown; H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal packing all mol­ecules are oriented along parallel lines, although turned/flipped alternately by roughly 180° around the mol­ecules’ approximate longitudinal axes through the three rings which rest on crystallographic glides in the ac planes. The crystallographic direction of these vectors approximates [40]. The crystal packing is stabilized by non-classical hydrogen-bonding contacts between the central sulfur atom (S2) of the S3 fragment as acceptor and a C—H of one cyclo­hexyl moiety (C6—H6B) as donor, pointing roughly into opposite directions and protruding along the c-axis direction (C6—H6B⋯S2i and S2⋯H6B ii—C6ii; symmetry codes: (i) x,  − y,  + z, (ii): x,  − y, − + z) (Fig. 3 ▸ and Table 1 ▸).
Figure 3

Crystal packing view along the a axis showing the non-classical hydrogen-bonding contacts (blue) protruding along the c-axis direction (analyzed and drawn with Mercury; Macrae et al., 2006 ▸).

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C6—H6B⋯S2i 0.992.963.787 (2)142

Symmetry code: (i) .

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was synthesized based on a modified literature procedure (Magnusson, 1959 ▸). A 20% aqueous solution of ammonium polysulfide (63.9 ml, 187 mmol) was cooled to 273 K and added dropwise over 10 min to stirred cyclo­hexa­none (25.8 ml, 250 mmol) cooled to the same temperature, leading to a uniform mixture of yellow color. Deviating from the reported procedure, addition of colloidal sulfur (4.0 g, 125 mmol), albeit quickly dissolving, leads to liquid–liquid phase separation and a change of color from yellow to green. After stirring for 24 h at 295 K, 100 ml of 10% aqueous acetic acid was added to the reaction mix, which then was extracted in 3 × 50 ml of diethyl ether. The organic fractions were combined and washed with aqueous, saturated NaHCO3 (1×100 ml) and water (1×100 ml), before being dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was reduced to 5 ml in vacuo and adsorbed onto isolute® HM-N, prior to purification by flash chromatography (silica 60, 20-45 µm particle diameter, 5 cm column diameter, 50 cm column length, 15 ml min−1 ethyl acetate (0–25%) in n-hexane, detection by thin layer chromatography and fluorescence quenching at 254 nm). Recrystallization from 0.1 ml mg−1 methanol yielded colorless block-like crystals, the identity of which was confirmed by melting point determination (356.5 K). As a result of the lipophilic nature of the analyte, the purity and stability of the colorless product was accessible to supercritical fluid chromatography (stationary phase: Torus DIOL column, mobile phase: scCO2 (A) and methanol containing 20 mM ammonium formate (B), isocratic mode (5% B), oven temperature: 313 K). Yield: 5.0 g (14%). 1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.45 ppm (q, 4H), 1.6 ppm (m, 8H), 1.9 ppm (t, 8H). 13C{1H} NMR (101MHz, CDCl3) δ 25.4 ppm, 37.8 ppm. IR (FT–IR): (υ cm−1) = 2926 (s), 1439 (s). Elemental analysis calculated for C12H20S5: C 44.40; H 6.21; S 49.39. Found: C 44.72; H 6.03; S 49.25.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All C-bound hydrogen atoms constitute methyl­ene protons, which were attached in calculated positions (C—H = 0.99 Å) and treated as riding with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H20S5
M r 324.58
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)170
a, b, c (Å)9.4174 (19), 9.970 (2), 15.877 (3)
β (°)98.94 (3)
V3)1472.6 (5)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.76
Crystal size (mm)0.39 × 0.36 × 0.28
 
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS2T
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections16257, 4048, 3534
R int 0.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.691
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.028, 0.071, 1.07
No. of reflections4048
No. of parameters154
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.35, −0.39

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2010 ▸), SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸) and CIFTAB (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007138/fy2136sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007138/fy2136Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019007138/fy2136Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1916548 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H20S5F(000) = 688
Mr = 324.58Dx = 1.464 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.4174 (19) ÅCell parameters from 16821 reflections
b = 9.970 (2) Åθ = 6.3–58.9°
c = 15.877 (3) ŵ = 0.76 mm1
β = 98.94 (3)°T = 170 K
V = 1472.6 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.39 × 0.36 × 0.28 mm
Stoe IPDS2T diffractometer3534 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.4°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −13→12
16257 measured reflectionsk = −13→13
4048 independent reflectionsl = −21→21
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.071H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.035P)2 + 0.4842P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4048 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
154 parametersΔρmax = 0.35 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.39 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.31425 (3)0.61591 (3)0.37879 (2)0.02374 (8)
S20.38015 (3)0.68085 (4)0.26964 (2)0.02454 (8)
S30.57525 (3)0.59559 (3)0.26792 (2)0.02661 (8)
S40.65189 (4)0.83978 (3)0.38610 (2)0.02869 (9)
S50.58752 (3)0.72925 (4)0.48039 (2)0.02763 (8)
C10.38995 (13)0.73599 (13)0.46088 (8)0.0209 (2)
C20.33611 (14)0.87799 (13)0.44215 (9)0.0248 (3)
H2A0.3574620.9055390.3855350.030*
H2B0.3881800.9394840.4852360.030*
C30.17466 (15)0.89094 (14)0.44305 (10)0.0285 (3)
H3A0.1462410.9862810.4352930.034*
H3B0.1218090.8394460.3947750.034*
C40.13306 (16)0.83957 (14)0.52607 (9)0.0295 (3)
H4A0.1750280.8990440.5733990.035*
H4B0.0271790.8425190.5222740.035*
C50.18500 (16)0.69697 (15)0.54533 (9)0.0298 (3)
H5A0.1326920.6354650.5023320.036*
H5B0.1633610.6701010.6020050.036*
C60.34657 (16)0.68404 (15)0.54448 (8)0.0280 (3)
H6A0.3748160.5886530.5522290.034*
H6B0.3992120.7353090.5929260.034*
C70.71249 (13)0.72138 (13)0.31199 (8)0.0219 (2)
C80.84149 (14)0.64097 (14)0.35539 (8)0.0252 (3)
H8A0.9121180.7031270.3874390.030*
H8B0.8091870.5780980.3968050.030*
C90.91472 (15)0.56165 (15)0.29197 (9)0.0289 (3)
H9A1.0003400.5151050.3226120.035*
H9B0.8477330.4929600.2637300.035*
C100.95977 (15)0.65513 (16)0.22523 (9)0.0291 (3)
H10A1.0045840.6022640.1835780.035*
H10B1.0321000.7196310.2531510.035*
C110.83096 (15)0.73143 (15)0.17883 (9)0.0280 (3)
H11A0.7629690.6672550.1465410.034*
H11B0.8636560.7942140.1374960.034*
C120.75366 (15)0.81008 (14)0.24074 (9)0.0264 (3)
H12A0.6656320.8510940.2088640.032*
H12B0.8168400.8834880.2663810.032*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.02576 (15)0.02375 (16)0.02281 (15)−0.00552 (12)0.00722 (11)−0.00510 (12)
S20.02277 (15)0.03175 (17)0.01882 (15)0.00001 (12)0.00232 (11)−0.00116 (12)
S30.02379 (15)0.02383 (16)0.03371 (18)−0.00428 (12)0.00918 (13)−0.00932 (12)
S40.02747 (16)0.02263 (16)0.03820 (19)−0.00624 (13)0.01207 (14)−0.01101 (13)
S50.02292 (15)0.0385 (2)0.02067 (15)0.00173 (13)0.00072 (11)−0.00585 (13)
C10.0228 (5)0.0217 (6)0.0186 (5)−0.0003 (5)0.0042 (4)−0.0028 (4)
C20.0276 (6)0.0192 (6)0.0296 (7)−0.0005 (5)0.0106 (5)−0.0007 (5)
C30.0284 (6)0.0247 (7)0.0349 (7)0.0046 (5)0.0122 (5)0.0043 (5)
C40.0309 (7)0.0280 (7)0.0327 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0146 (6)−0.0021 (6)
C50.0361 (7)0.0289 (7)0.0274 (7)−0.0022 (6)0.0145 (5)0.0026 (5)
C60.0350 (7)0.0306 (7)0.0195 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0075 (5)0.0033 (5)
C70.0211 (5)0.0203 (6)0.0247 (6)−0.0023 (5)0.0049 (4)−0.0037 (5)
C80.0245 (6)0.0279 (6)0.0233 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0040 (5)0.0019 (5)
C90.0265 (6)0.0309 (7)0.0299 (7)0.0071 (5)0.0065 (5)0.0015 (5)
C100.0236 (6)0.0381 (8)0.0268 (7)−0.0002 (6)0.0073 (5)−0.0016 (6)
C110.0283 (6)0.0333 (7)0.0230 (6)−0.0023 (6)0.0059 (5)0.0033 (5)
C120.0276 (6)0.0216 (6)0.0304 (7)−0.0009 (5)0.0059 (5)0.0032 (5)
S1—C11.8306 (13)C5—H5B0.9900
S1—S22.0353 (6)C6—H6A0.9900
S2—S32.0284 (6)C6—H6B0.9900
S3—C71.8579 (13)C7—C81.5274 (18)
S4—C71.8200 (13)C7—C121.5325 (18)
S4—S52.0261 (6)C8—C91.5267 (19)
S5—C11.8393 (13)C8—H8A0.9900
C1—C21.5175 (18)C8—H8B0.9900
C1—C61.5382 (18)C9—C101.520 (2)
C2—C31.5282 (19)C9—H9A0.9900
C2—H2A0.9900C9—H9B0.9900
C2—H2B0.9900C10—C111.522 (2)
C3—C41.5211 (19)C10—H10A0.9900
C3—H3A0.9900C10—H10B0.9900
C3—H3B0.9900C11—C121.5277 (19)
C4—C51.519 (2)C11—H11A0.9900
C4—H4A0.9900C11—H11B0.9900
C4—H4B0.9900C12—H12A0.9900
C5—C61.529 (2)C12—H12B0.9900
C5—H5A0.9900
C1—S1—S2105.16 (5)C1—C6—H6B109.2
S3—S2—S1105.95 (3)H6A—C6—H6B107.9
C7—S3—S2106.89 (5)C8—C7—C12111.17 (10)
C7—S4—S5106.55 (5)C8—C7—S4110.87 (9)
C1—S5—S4105.47 (5)C12—C7—S4104.10 (9)
C2—C1—C6110.96 (10)C8—C7—S3105.87 (9)
C2—C1—S1112.92 (9)C12—C7—S3110.64 (9)
C6—C1—S1105.53 (9)S4—C7—S3114.31 (7)
C2—C1—S5111.44 (9)C9—C8—C7112.56 (11)
C6—C1—S5103.87 (9)C9—C8—H8A109.1
S1—C1—S5111.58 (7)C7—C8—H8A109.1
C1—C2—C3112.31 (11)C9—C8—H8B109.1
C1—C2—H2A109.1C7—C8—H8B109.1
C3—C2—H2A109.1H8A—C8—H8B107.8
C1—C2—H2B109.1C10—C9—C8110.22 (12)
C3—C2—H2B109.1C10—C9—H9A109.6
H2A—C2—H2B107.9C8—C9—H9A109.6
C4—C3—C2111.73 (12)C10—C9—H9B109.6
C4—C3—H3A109.3C8—C9—H9B109.6
C2—C3—H3A109.3H9A—C9—H9B108.1
C4—C3—H3B109.3C9—C10—C11110.86 (11)
C2—C3—H3B109.3C9—C10—H10A109.5
H3A—C3—H3B107.9C11—C10—H10A109.5
C5—C4—C3111.80 (11)C9—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4—H4A109.3C11—C10—H10B109.5
C3—C4—H4A109.3H10A—C10—H10B108.1
C5—C4—H4B109.3C10—C11—C12111.65 (12)
C3—C4—H4B109.3C10—C11—H11A109.3
H4A—C4—H4B107.9C12—C11—H11A109.3
C4—C5—C6111.52 (12)C10—C11—H11B109.3
C4—C5—H5A109.3C12—C11—H11B109.3
C6—C5—H5A109.3H11A—C11—H11B108.0
C4—C5—H5B109.3C11—C12—C7112.29 (11)
C6—C5—H5B109.3C11—C12—H12A109.1
H5A—C5—H5B108.0C7—C12—H12A109.1
C5—C6—C1112.17 (11)C11—C12—H12B109.1
C5—C6—H6A109.2C7—C12—H12B109.1
C1—C6—H6A109.2H12A—C12—H12B107.9
C5—C6—H6B109.2
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C6—H6B···S2i0.992.963.787 (2)142
  10 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 2.  The role of metals in mammalian olfaction of low molecular weight organosulfur compounds.

Authors:  Eric Block; Victor S Batista; Hiroaki Matsunami; Hanyi Zhuang; Lucky Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 13.423

Review 3.  Natural Products with Heteroatom-Rich Ring Systems.

Authors:  Emma K Davison; Jonathan Sperry
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  Molecular single-bond covalent radii for elements 1-118.

Authors:  Pekka Pyykkö; Michiko Atsumi
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 5.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CII: Pharmacological Modulation of H2S Levels: H2S Donors and H2S Biosynthesis Inhibitors.

Authors:  Csaba Szabo; Andreas Papapetropoulos
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Meat flavor generation from different composition patterns of initial Maillard stage intermediates formed in heated cysteine-xylose-glycine reaction systems.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Tianze Wang; Jianchun Xie; Qunfei Xiao; Wenbin Du; Yaxin Wang; Jie Cheng; Shi Wang
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 7.514

7.  Highly sulfurated heterocycles via dithiiranes and trithietanes as key intermediates.

Authors:  Grzegorz Mloston; Agnieszka Majchrzak; Alexander Senning; Inger Søtofte
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.