Literature DB >> 31391764

Role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Anastasia Kontana1, Konstantinos Tziomalos2.   

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. NAFLD is considerably more frequent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in the general population and is also more severe histologically in this group. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, the newest class of antidiabetic agents, appear to represent a promising option for the management of NAFLD in patients with T2DM. In a number of studies, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in a reduction in hepatic steatosis and in transaminase levels. However, existing studies are small, their follow-up period was short and none evaluated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on liver histology. Accordingly, larger studies are needed to verify these preliminary results and define the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of NAFLD in patients with T2DM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibrosis; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors; Steatosis; Transaminases; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391764      PMCID: PMC6676552          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core tip: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is more frequent and more severe in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in the general population. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors appear to represent a promising option for the management of NAFLD in patients with T2DM. However, existing studies are small, their follow-up period was short and none evaluated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on liver histology. Accordingly, larger studies are needed to verify these preliminary results and define the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of NAFLD in patients with T2DM.

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and is defined as increased intrahepatic fat accumulation, in the absence of a history of alcohol abuse, intake of steatogenic medications and other causes of chronic liver disease[1]. NAFLD covers a wide range of histological and clinical disorders, from nonalcoholic fatty liver, which refers to isolated steatosis affecting hepatocytes, to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), where inflammation and fibrosis coexist with steatosis and might progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[2-4]. The current prevalence of NAFLD is proportional to the increasing rates of obesity and is estimated to affect 24%-46% of the general population[4,5]. On the other hand, the prevalence of NAFLD is considerably higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in the general population, ranging between 50%-75%[4,6,7]. Moreover, NAFLD appears to be more severe histologically in patients with T2DM[4,6,7]. Importantly, T2DM is a risk factor not only for NASH but also for the development of cirrhosis and HCC[8,9]. Indeed, NAFLD is considered as the hepatic phenotype of metabolic syndrome, a prediabetic disorder related to insulin resistance and abdominal obesity[10]. The pathogenesis of NAFLD also involves the increased efflux of free fatty acids to the liver as well as with oxidative stress, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and hepatocellular apoptosis[11]. Notably, both T2DM and NAFLD are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, which represents the leading cause of death in both diseases[12,13]. Currently, there are no approved pharmacological treatments for NAFLD and the mainstay of management is lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise[1]. Among antidiabetic agents, limited data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists might exert a beneficial effect on NAFLD whereas other classes do not appear to be effective[1]. Given the frequent coexistence of NAFLD and T2DM as well as the increased liver- and cardiovascular-related morbidity associated with their coexistence, there is a pressing need to develop effective therapeutic interventions for patients with T2DM-associated NAFLD.

ACTIONS OF SODIUM-GLUCOSE CO-TRANSPORTER 2 INHIBITORS

In this context, emerging evidence suggests that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors might represent a useful tool for the management of these patients. SGLT2 inhibitors are the newest class of oral hypoglycemic agents and reduce blood glucose levels by inhibiting renal tubular glucose reabsorption[14]. This results in increased urinary glucose excretion without stimulating insulin release and hence without a risk of hypoglycemia. In addition to their hypoglycemic action, SGLT2 inhibitors induce weight loss by inducing urinary glucose excretion and osmotic diuresis[14]. They also reduce blood pressure by stimulating urinary sodium excretion[15]. Notably, recent large randomized controlled trials showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular morbidity in patients with T2DM[16,17].

EFFECTS OF SGLT2 INHBITORS ON NAFLD

Regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on NAFLD in patients with T2DM, a number of small studies (n = 16-84) with a relatively short follow-up (12-24 wk) yielded encouraging results[18-23]. Indeed, a reduction in hepatic fat content was observed as evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomo-graphy[18-21,23]. A decrease in transaminase levels was also recorded in most studies[18-22]. Moreover, a reduction in markers of hepatocellular apoptosis (cytokeratin 18-M30 and 18-M65) was observed[18]. A small study (n = 16) reported a decrease in type IV collagen 7S levels, a marker of hepatic fibrosis, after treatment with dapagliflozin for 24 weeks[22] but another study (n = 40) reported no change in type IV collagen 7S levels or in other markers of fibrosis (Fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score) after treatment with luseogliflozin for 24 wk[21]. Weight loss, a reduction in blood pressure, a decrease inHbA1c and fasting glucose levels as well as an improvement of the lipid profile were also recorded[18-23]. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was generally well-tolerated, apart from an increased incidence of genitourinary tract infections[18-23]. Interestingly, in a comparative study, ipragliflozin was as effective as pioglitazone in the reduction of hepatic steatosis[19]. Moreover, in another comparative study, luseogliflozin was more effective than metformin in reducing hepatic steatosis[23]. Several mechanisms appear to be implicated in the beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on T2DM-associated NAFLD (Figure 1). Weight loss is an important mediator of the improvement in hepatic steatosis[18-21,23]. Furthermore, a relative increase in fatty acid oxidation instead of carbohydrate oxidation could also play a role in the reduction of hepatic fat accumulation and might also suppress hepatic inflammation[14]. Moreover, data from animal models support a direct positive effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on insulin resistance and an inhibitory effect on liver injury and lipotoxicity[24,25]. Importantly, a recent preclinical study also showed that canagliflozin reduces the risk for hepatocellular cancer in an animal model of NASH[26].
Figure 1

Mechanisms implicated in the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Mechanisms implicated in the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2 inhibitors appear to represent a promising option for the management of NAFLD in patients with T2DM. However, existing studies are small, their follow-up period was short and none evaluated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on liver histology. Moreover, these agents induce a notable increase in non-serious adverse events, particularly urinary and genital tract infections, and their glucose-lowering benefit might have been overestimated[27]. In addition, even though the phar-macokinetics of SGLT2 inhibitors are unlikely to be affected by the presence of hepatic impairment, there are limited data regarding the safety of these agents in patients with severe liver dysfunction (e.g., Child-Pugh grade C)[28-30]. Therefore, close monitoring is required during the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with advanced cirrhosis, particularly in patients with ascites who are receiving diuretics. Overall, larger studies are needed to verify the preliminary findings suggesting a benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors in NAFLD and to define their role in the treatment of this common comorbidity in patients with T2DM.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Paul Angulo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Large-scale long-term follow-up study of Japanese patients with non-alcoholic Fatty liver disease for the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yusuke Kawamura; Yasuji Arase; Kenji Ikeda; Yuya Seko; Norihiro Imai; Tetsuya Hosaka; Masahiro Kobayashi; Satoshi Saitoh; Hitomi Sezaki; Norio Akuta; Fumitaka Suzuki; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Yuki Ohmoto; Kazuhisa Amakawa; Hiroshi Tsuji; Hiromitsu Kumada
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Leon A Adams; James F Lymp; Jenny St Sauver; Schuyler O Sanderson; Keith D Lindor; Ariel Feldstein; Paul Angulo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Disease progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study with paired liver biopsies at 3 years.

Authors:  Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Paul Cheung-Lung Choi; Anthony Wing-Hung Chan; Mia Ka-Po Li; Hoi-Yun Chan; Angel Mei-Ling Chim; Jun Yu; Joseph Jao-Yiu Sung; Henry Lik-Yuen Chan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  S Macha; P Rose; M Mattheus; R Cinca; S Pinnetti; U C Broedl; H J Woerle
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a precursor of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Amedeo Lonardo; Stefano Ballestri; Giulio Marchesini; Paul Angulo; Paola Loria
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 7.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Briohny W Smith; Leon A Adams
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.250

8.  Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Browning; Lidia S Szczepaniak; Robert Dobbins; Pamela Nuremberg; Jay D Horton; Jonathan C Cohen; Scott M Grundy; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor.

Authors:  Damayanthi Devineni; Christopher R Curtin; Thomas C Marbury; William Smith; Nicole Vaccaro; David Wexler; An Vandebosch; Sarah Rusch; Hans Stieltjes; Ewa Wajs
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies.

Authors:  N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the Glycaemic Control of Dapagliflozin: Microangiopathy and Non-classical Complications.

Authors:  Virginia Bellido; Julia Martínez; Fernando Calvo; Aida Villarroel; Edurne Lecumberri; Juan Moreno; Carlos Morillas; Silvia Rodrigo; Aitziber Izarra; Albert Lecube
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.595

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.