Literature DB >> 31391223

Efficacy and safety of ralinepag, a novel oral IP agonist, in PAH patients on mono or dual background therapy: results from a phase 2 randomised, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial.

Fernando Torres1, Harrison Farber2, Arsen Ristic3, Vallerie McLaughlin4, John Adams5, Jinkun Zhang5, Preston Klassen5, William Shanahan6, John Grundy5, Ines Hoffmann5, Christopher Cabell5, Pilar Escribano Subías7, Namita Sood8, Anne Keogh9, Gwyn D'Souza5, Lewis Rubin10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase 2 study was designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of immediate-release orally administered ralinepag, a selective, non-prostanoid prostacyclin receptor agonist with a 24-h terminal half-life, compared to placebo in adult patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
METHODS: 61 PAH patients who were receiving standard care, including mono or dual PAH-targeted background therapy were randomised 2:1 to ralinepag (n=40) or placebo (n=21). The starting dose of ralinepag was 10 μg twice daily. Dosage was then up-titrated as tolerated over the course of the 9-week dose-titration period, to a maximum total daily dose of 600 μg (300 μg twice daily). The primary efficacy end-point was the absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 22. Additional end-points included percentage change in PVR from baseline, other haemodynamic parameters, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and safety and tolerability.
RESULTS: Ralinepag significantly decreased PVR by 163.9 dyn·s·cm-5 compared to an increase of 0.7 dyn·s·cm-5 with placebo (p=0.02); the least-squares mean change from baseline PVR was -29.8% compared with placebo (p=0.03). 6MWD increased from baseline by 36.2 m with ralinepag and 29.4 m with placebo (p=0.90). Serious adverse events occurred in 10% of ralinepag patients and 29% of placebo patients. Study discontinuations occurred in 13% of ralinepag patients and 10% of placebo patients.
SUMMARY: Ralinepag reduced PVR compared with placebo in PAH patients on mono (41%) or dual combination (59%) background therapy.
Copyright ©ERS 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391223     DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01030-2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  6 in total

1.  Transcriptomic analysis of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells identifies new potential therapeutic targets for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Matthew W Gorr; Krishna Sriram; Abinaya Muthusamy; Paul A Insel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Jennalyn D Mayeux; Irene Z Pan; John Dechand; Joshua A Jacobs; Tara L Jones; Stephen H McKellar; Emily Beck; Nathan D Hatton; John J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2020-11-18

3.  Effects of oral targeted treatments in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Ru Zhu; Hong-Yu Kuang; Qiang Li; Xiao-Juan Ji
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  Novel Treatment Pathways in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Kanza N Qaiser; Adriano R Tonelli
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2021-07-01

5.  Transitioning Between Prostanoid Therapies in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Irene Z Pan; Jessica R Carey; Joshua A Jacobs; John Dechand; Joshua J Sessions; Teshia Sorensen; Brittany A Penn; Jennalyn D Mayeux; Nathan D Hatton; John J Ryan
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 6.  Advances in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Himanshu Deshwal; Tatiana Weinstein; Roxana Sulica
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.