Literature DB >> 31390675

Accuracy of MRI Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears of the Knee: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Wei Wang1, Zheng Li1, Hui-Ming Peng1, Yan-Yan Bian1, Ye Li1, Wen-Wei Qian1, Xi-Sheng Weng1, Jin Jin1, Xin-Yu Yang1, Jin Lin1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the overall diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected meniscal tears. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase database updated to November 2017 were searched by the index words to identify qualified studies, including prospective cohort studies and cross-sectional studies. Literature was also identified by tracking using reference lists. Heterogeneity of the included studies was reviewed to select proper effects model for pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analyses were performed for meniscal tears. A total of 17 studies were involved in this meta-analysis to explore the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for meniscal tears. The global sensitivity and specificity of MRI of meniscal tears were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.0-95.0%) and 90.0% (95% CI: 85.0-95.0%) in medial meniscal tears, and 80.0% (95% CI: 66.0-89.0%) and 95.0% (95% CI: 91.0-97.0%) in lateral meniscal tears, respectively. Moreover, the global positive and negative likelihood ratio of MRI of meniscal tears were 10.33 (95% CI: 6.04-17.67) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14) in medial meniscal tears; 16.48 (95% CI: 8.81-30.83) and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.12-0.37) in lateral meniscal tears, respectively. The global DOR was 81.69 (95% CI: 37.94-175.91) in medial meniscal tears and 56.59 (95% CI: 22.51-142.28) in lateral meniscal tears. The results of area under the SROC indicated high accuracy in medial meniscal tears (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98) and lateral meniscal tears (AUC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.97). This review presents a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI of meniscal tears. Moderate-to-strong evidence suggests that MRI appears to be associated with higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting medial and lateral meniscal tears. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31390675     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  4 in total

1.  Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Stephen Ebohon; Christian Ries; Diarmuid De Faoite
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Comparison of Accuracy in Expert Clinical Examination versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Exam in Diagnosis of Meniscal Tear.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Mohammad Reza Ranjbar; Mohammad Tahami; Reza Shahriarirad; Amirhossein Erfani
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-05-08

3.  Increased MRI Signal Intensity of Allografts in the Midterm Period After Meniscal Allograft Transplant: An Evaluation of Clinical Significance According to Location and Morphology.

Authors:  Jun-Gu Park; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Bum-Sik Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Ju-Ho Song
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  MRI evaluation of meniscal anatomy: which parameters reach the best inter-observer concordance?

Authors:  Dario Grasso; Aroa Gnesutta; Marco Calvi; Marta Duvia; Maria Giovanna Atria; Angelica Celentano; Leonardo Callegari; Eugenio Annibale Genovese
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.313

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.