Literature DB >> 31390272

Ten-Year Epidemiology of Ankle Injuries in Men's and Women's Collegiate Soccer Players.

Matthew Gulbrandsen1, David E Hartigan2, Karan A Patel2, Justin L Makovicka2, Sailesh V Tummala3, Anikar Chhabra2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Data from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance Program (ISP) have indicated that ankle injuries are the most common injuries among NCAA soccer players.
OBJECTIVE: To review 10 years of NCAA-ISP data for soccer players' ankle injuries to understand how the time period (2004-2005 through 2008-2009 versus 2009-2010 through 2013-2014), anatomical structure injured, and sex of the athlete affected the injury rate, mechanism, and prognosis.
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study.
SETTING: Online injury surveillance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The NCAA-ISP was queried for men's and women's soccer ankle data from 2004 to 2014. Ankle-injury rates were calculated on the basis of injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures. Rate ratios (RRs) were used to compare injury rates. Injury proportion ratios (IPRs) were used to compare injury characteristics.
RESULTS: When compared with the 2004-2005 through 2008-2009 seasons, the 2009-2010 through 2013-2014 seasons showed a similar rate of injuries (RR = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85, 1.04) but fewer days missed (P < .001) and fewer recurrent injuries (IPR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.74). The 4 most common ankle injuries, which accounted for 95% of ankle injuries, were lateral ligament complex tears (65.67%), tibiofibular ligament (high ankle) sprains (10.3%), contusions (10.1%), and medial (deltoid) ligament tears (9.77%). Of these injuries, high ankle sprains were most likely to cause athletes to miss ≥30 days (IPR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.24, 2.90). Men and women had similar injury rates (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94, 1.11). Men had more contact injuries (IPR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.16, 1.41) and contusion injuries (IPR = 1.34, CI = 1.03, 1.73) but fewer noncontact injuries (IPR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.95) and lateral ligamentous complex injuries (IPR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86, 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of ankle injuries did not change between the 2004-2005 through 2008-2009 seasons and the 2009-2010 through 2013-2014 seasons, the prognoses improved. Among the 4 most common ankle injuries, high ankle sprains resulted in the worst prognosis. Overall, male and female NCAA soccer players injured their ankles at similar rates; however, men were more likely to sustain contact injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  injury characterization; national estimates; soccer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31390272      PMCID: PMC6756601          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-144-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  22 in total

1.  An examination of injuries in major league soccer. The inaugural season.

Authors:  B E Morgan; M A Oberlander
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Injury risk associated with playing actions during competitive soccer.

Authors:  N Rahnama; T Reilly; A Lees
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  The effect of a proprioceptive balance board training program for the prevention of ankle sprains: a prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Evert Verhagen; Allard van der Beek; Jos Twisk; Lex Bouter; Roald Bahr; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Comparison of 3 preventive methods to reduce the recurrence of ankle inversion sprains in male soccer players.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Combined effects of fatigue and decision making on female lower limb landing postures: central and peripheral contributions to ACL injury risk.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; Rhonda Newcomer; Ryan Koppes; Scott G McLean
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate women's soccer injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2002-2003.

Authors:  Randall Dick; Margot Putukian; Julie Agel; Todd A Evans; Stephen W Marshall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men's soccer injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2002-2003.

Authors:  Julie Agel; Todd A Evans; Randall Dick; Margot Putukian; Stephen W Marshall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hootman; Randall Dick; Julie Agel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Comparisons of rates and forms of aggression among members of men's and women's collegiate recreational flag football teams.

Authors:  Katherine B Warden; Stacey C Grasso; Paul D Luyben
Journal:  J Prev Interv Community       Date:  2009

10.  Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study.

Authors:  J Ekstrand; M Hägglund; M Waldén
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS) for Ankle Lateral Ligament Reconstruction in Higher-Risk Patients: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark D Porter; Aleksandra Trajkovska; Ekavi Georgousopoulou
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Bilateral symmetry of vertical time to stabilization in postural sway after double-leg landing in elite athletes with unilateral chronic ankle sprain.

Authors:  Ali Yalfani; Zahra Raeisi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Histological and Inflammatory Cytokine Analysis of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus After Failed Microfracture: Comparison With Fresh Allograft Controls.

Authors:  Richard M Danilkowicz; Nicholas B Allen; Nate Grimm; Dana L Nettles; James A Nunley; Mark E Easley; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.