Literature DB >> 31388872

Evaluation of radiation doses at diagnostic X-ray control panels and outside patient entrance doors in Aizawl district, India.

Jonathan Lalrinmawia1,2, Kham Suan Pau2, Ramesh Chandra Tiwari3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to measure the radiation level and estimate the dosage at the control panel (CP) and outside the patient entrance door (PED) of diagnostic X-ray installations. This is important for ensuring the safety of workers and the public, particularly in the study area, where there is no proper radiation monitoring service. A water phantom, 10-L fresh water in a plastic container, was used as the source of scattered radiation. Using an ion-chamber survey meter, the stray radiation rate was measured at the CP and outside the PED for both chest and couch missions. The CPs were fully covered by a protective barrier, providing a negligible exposure rate (i.e., 0.07-4.2 mR/h for chest and 0.21-3.8 mR/h for couch). By contrast, installations that did not properly cover the CP showed relatively high exposures (from 18 to 205 mR/h for chest and 2.4-270 mR/h for couch). The radiation rates outside the PED in installations having lead-lined doors were negligibly low; whereas, in installations having no lead-lining, exposure rates reached as high as 95 and 110 mR/h for chest and couch missions, respectively. The occupational doses were well below the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board dose limit (i.e., 40 mR/week). However, excessive doses were observed in public spaces outside the PED, compared with the dose limit for the public (i.e., 2 mR/week).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional diagnostic X-ray; Occupational dose; Patient entrance door; Protective barrier; Public dose; Radiation safety

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31388872     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-019-00526-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  15 in total

1.  Radiation exposure of staff in diagnostic procedures. II. Radiation doses received by diagnostic x-ray workers.

Authors:  S B OSBORN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation exposure of staff in diagnostic procedures. III. Some aspects of radiation hygiene.

Authors:  W BINKS
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Recent history of the shielding of medical x-ray imaging facilities.

Authors:  Benjamin R Archer
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Excessive leakage radiation measured on two mobile X-ray units due to the methodology used by the manufacturer to calculate and specify the required tube shielding.

Authors:  I A Tsalafoutas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Measuring scatter radiation in diagnostic X rays for radiation protection purposes.

Authors:  Ioannis Vlachos; Xenophon Tsantilas; Nektarios Kalyvas; Harry Delis; Ioannis Kandarakis; George Panayiotakis
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  A national survey of occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiologic technologists in South Korea.

Authors:  Jeeyoung Lee; Eun Shil Cha; Meeseon Jeong; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Solid cancer incidence among Chinese medical diagnostic x-ray workers, 1950-1995: Estimation of radiation-related risks.

Authors:  Zhijuan Sun; Peter D Inskip; Jixian Wang; Deukwoo Kwon; Yongcheng Zhao; Liangan Zhang; Qin Wang; Saijun Fan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Radiological safety status and quality assurance audit of medical X-ray diagnostic installations in India.

Authors:  A U Sonawane; Meghraj Singh; J V K Sunil Kumar; Arti Kulkarni; V K Shirva; A S Pradhan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

Review 10.  Medical interventional procedures-reducing the radiation risks.

Authors:  C Cousins; C Sharp
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.350

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.