Literature DB >> 31388860

Cellular Uptake and Distribution of Gemini Surfactant Nanoparticles Used as Gene Delivery Agents.

Wei Jin1, Mays Al-Dulaymi1, Ildiko Badea1, Scot C Leary2, Jeveria Rehman3, Anas El-Aneed4.   

Abstract

Gemini surfactants are promising molecules utilized as non-viral gene delivery vectors. However, little is known about their cellular uptake and distribution after they release their therapeutic cargo. Therefore, we quantitatively evaluated the cellular uptake and distribution of three gemini surfactants: unsubstituted (16-3-16), with pyridinium head groups (16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py)) and substituted with a glycyl-lysine di-peptide (16-7N(GK)-16). We also assessed the relationship between cellular uptake and distribution of each gemini surfactant and its overall efficiency and toxicity. Epidermal keratinocytes PAM 212 were treated with gemini surfactant nanoparticles formulated with plasmid DNA and harvested at various time points to collect the enriched nuclear, mitochondrial, plasma membrane, and cytosolic fractions. Gemini surfactants were then extracted from each subcellular fraction and quantified using a validated flow injection analysis-tandem mass spectrometry (FIA-MS/MS) method. Mass spectrometry is superior to the use of fluorescent tags that alter the physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetics of the nanoparticles and can be cleaved from the gemini surfactant molecules within biological systems. Overall, a significantly higher cellular uptake was observed for 16-7N(GK)-16 (17.0%) compared with 16-3-6 (3.6%) and 16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py) (1.4%), which explained the relatively higher transfection efficiency of 16-7N(GK)-16. Gemini surfactants 16-3-16 and 16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py) displayed similar subcellular distribution patterns, with major accumulation in the nucleus, followed by the mitochondrion, cytosol, and plasma membrane. In contrast, 16-7N(GK)-16 was relatively evenly distributed across all four subcellular fractions. However, accumulation within the nucleus after 5 h of treatment was the highest for 16(Py)-S-2-S-16(Py) (50.3%), followed by 16-3-16 (41.8%) and then 16-7N(GK)-16 (33.4%), possibly leading to its relatively higher toxicity. Graphical Abstract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FIA-MS/MS; gemini surfactants; gene delivery; subcellular distribution; toxicity; transfection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31388860     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0367-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  45 in total

1.  Cellular fate of a modular DNA delivery system mediated by silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Richard A Gemeinhart; Dan Luo; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Gemini surfactants: a new family of building blocks for non-viral gene delivery systems.

Authors:  Shawn D Wettig; Ronald E Verrall; Marianna Foldvari
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.391

3.  Development of amino acid substituted gemini surfactant-based mucoadhesive gene delivery systems for potential use as noninvasive vaginal genetic vaccination.

Authors:  Jagbir Singh; Deborah Michel; Heather M Getson; Jackson M Chitanda; Ronald E Verrall; Ildiko Badea
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Thermodynamic investigation of the binding of dissymmetric pyrenyl-gemini surfactants to DNA.

Authors:  Shawn D Wettig; Rubena Deubry; Javed Akbar; Tranum Kaur; Haitang Wang; Tatiana Sheinin; Jamie W Joseph; Roderick A Slavcev
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Synthesis and aggregation properties of dissymmetric phytanyl-gemini surfactants for use as improved DNA transfection vectors.

Authors:  Haitang Wang; Shawn D Wettig
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 6.  Endocytosis of gene delivery vectors: from clathrin-dependent to lipid raft-mediated endocytosis.

Authors:  Ayman El-Sayed; Hideyoshi Harashima
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Gemini surfactant based carriers in gene and drug delivery.

Authors:  C Bombelli; L Giansanti; P Luciani; G Mancini
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Novel gemini pyridinium surfactants: synthesis and study of their surface activity, DNA binding, and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Avinash Bhadani; Sukhprit Singh
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Di-Peptide-Modified Gemini Surfactants as Gene Delivery Vectors: Exploring the Role of the Alkyl Tail in Their Physicochemical Behavior and Biological Activity.

Authors:  Mays A Al-Dulaymi; Jackson M Chitanda; Waleed Mohammed-Saeid; Hessamaddin Younesi Araghi; Ronald E Verrall; Pawel Grochulski; Ildiko Badea
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Evaluation of cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking as determining factors of gene expression for amino acid-substituted gemini surfactant-based DNA nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jagbir Singh; Deborah Michel; Jackson M Chitanda; Ronald E Verrall; Ildiko Badea
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 10.435

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Application of advances in endocytosis and membrane trafficking to drug delivery.

Authors:  Yaping Ju; Hao Guo; Maria Edman; Sarah F Hamm-Alvarez
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  H2O2-responsive VEGF/NGF gene co-delivery nano-system achieves stable vascularization in ischemic hindlimbs.

Authors:  Youlu Chen; Zuoguan Chen; Jianwei Duan; Liang Gui; Huiyang Li; Xiaoyu Liang; Xinxin Tian; Kaijing Liu; Yongjun Li; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 3.  Non-viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Recent Development, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Hui Zu; Danchen Gao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.