INTRODUCTION: The incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not changed significantly in the past 2 decades despite increased operative experience and technical refinement. We sought to evaluate surgeon-specific factors associated with BDI and to assess how surgeons manage injuries. METHODS: An online survey was sent to surgeons belonging to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons via e-mail. Survey items included personal experience with BDI and how injuries were addressed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BDI. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 3411 surgeons with 559 complete responses (16.5%). The mean age of respondents was 48.7 years with an average time in practice of 16.1 years. Most respondents (61.2%) had fellowship training. Forty-seven percent of surgeons surveyed experienced a BDI in their career with 17.1% of surgeons experiencing multiple BDIs. The majority of BDIs were identified in the operating room (64.5%); most injuries (66.9%) were repaired immediately. When repair was undertaken immediately, 77.4% of these repairs were performed in an open technique. A majority of surgeons (57.7%) felt that BDIs could theoretically be repaired laparoscopically and 25% of those surgeons had done so in practice. In multivariate logistic regression, any type of fellowship training was associated with a decreased risk of BDI (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). Compared with those in non-academic practice, surgeons in academic practice were at a significantly decreased risk of having experienced a BDI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of those surveyed, experienced a BDI during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Community and private practice setting were associated with an increased risk of BDI, while fellowship training and academic practice setting conferred a protective effect. A majority of surgeons felt that BDI could be repaired laparoscopically and 25% had done so in practice.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not changed significantly in the past 2 decades despite increased operative experience and technical refinement. We sought to evaluate surgeon-specific factors associated with BDI and to assess how surgeons manage injuries. METHODS: An online survey was sent to surgeons belonging to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons via e-mail. Survey items included personal experience with BDI and how injuries were addressed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BDI. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 3411 surgeons with 559 complete responses (16.5%). The mean age of respondents was 48.7 years with an average time in practice of 16.1 years. Most respondents (61.2%) had fellowship training. Forty-seven percent of surgeons surveyed experienced a BDI in their career with 17.1% of surgeons experiencing multiple BDIs. The majority of BDIs were identified in the operating room (64.5%); most injuries (66.9%) were repaired immediately. When repair was undertaken immediately, 77.4% of these repairs were performed in an open technique. A majority of surgeons (57.7%) felt that BDIs could theoretically be repaired laparoscopically and 25% of those surgeons had done so in practice. In multivariate logistic regression, any type of fellowship training was associated with a decreased risk of BDI (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). Compared with those in non-academic practice, surgeons in academic practice were at a significantly decreased risk of having experienced a BDI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of those surveyed, experienced a BDI during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Community and private practice setting were associated with an increased risk of BDI, while fellowship training and academic practice setting conferred a protective effect. A majority of surgeons felt that BDI could be repaired laparoscopically and 25% had done so in practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Minimally invasive
Authors: Nicola de'Angelis; Fausto Catena; Riccardo Memeo; Federico Coccolini; Aleix Martínez-Pérez; Oreste M Romeo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Raffaele Brustia; Rami Rhaiem; Tullio Piardi; Maria Conticchio; Francesco Marchegiani; Nassiba Beghdadi; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Ruslan Alikhanov; Marc-Antoine Allard; Niccolò Allievi; Giuliana Amaddeo; Luca Ansaloni; Roland Andersson; Enrico Andolfi; Mohammad Azfar; Miklosh Bala; Amine Benkabbou; Offir Ben-Ishay; Giorgio Bianchi; Walter L Biffl; Francesco Brunetti; Maria Clotilde Carra; Daniel Casanova; Valerio Celentano; Marco Ceresoli; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Roberto Bini; Raul Coimbra; Gian Luigi de'Angelis; Francesco Decembrino; Andrea De Palma; Philip R de Reuver; Carlos Domingo; Christian Cotsoglou; Alessandro Ferrero; Gustavo P Fraga; Federica Gaiani; Federico Gheza; Angela Gurrado; Ewen Harrison; Angel Henriquez; Stefan Hofmeyr; Roberta Iadarola; Jeffry L Kashuk; Reza Kianmanesh; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Filippo Landi; Serena Langella; Real Lapointe; Bertrand Le Roy; Alain Luciani; Fernando Machado; Umberto Maggi; Ronald V Maier; Alain Chichom Mefire; Kazuhiro Hiramatsu; Carlos Ordoñez; Franca Patrizi; Manuel Planells; Andrew B Peitzman; Juan Pekolj; Fabiano Perdigao; Bruno M Pereira; Patrick Pessaux; Michele Pisano; Juan Carlos Puyana; Sandro Rizoli; Luca Portigliotti; Raffaele Romito; Boris Sakakushev; Behnam Sanei; Olivier Scatton; Mario Serradilla-Martin; Anne-Sophie Schneck; Mohammed Lamine Sissoko; Iradj Sobhani; Richard P Ten Broek; Mario Testini; Roberto Valinas; Giorgos Veloudis; Giulio Cesare Vitali; Dieter Weber; Luigi Zorcolo; Felice Giuliante; Paschalis Gavriilidis; David Fuks; Daniele Sommacale Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.469