T Hoffmann1, P Oelzner1, J Böttcher2, G Wolf1, A Pfeil3. 1. Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. 2. Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. alexander.pfeil@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The initial presentation of patients with symptoms indicative of a rheumatic disease is in most cases not directly to a rheumatologist. This study evaluated the following questions: I. Which medical specialists refer patients to a department of rheumatology? II. Evaluation of the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis by a rheumatologist. METHODS: A total of 947 patients (279 men and 668 women) who initially presented to a university hospital for rheumatological diagnostics were included in the study. The referring medical specialist fields were identified. Furthermore, a kappa analysis was performed to evaluate the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis generated after a rheumatological evaluation of the patients. RESULTS: Of the referrals 73% were initiated by general practitioners or internists functioning as general practitioners. The other referrers were 5% specialists in internal medicine (excluding rheumatology), 4% orthopedic/trauma surgeons, 1% other surgeons and 4% other specialist fields. A rheumatological diagnosis was made in 58% of the patients and rheumatological inflammatory joint diseases (26%), collagenosis (14%) and vasculitides (5%) were the most frequently diagnoses. The accordance of the presumptive diagnosis of the general practitioners and the final diagnosis after rheumatological evaluation was a kappa coefficient of κ = 0.304. Lower kappa values were evaluated for orthopedic surgeons (κ = 0.277) and other specialists (κ = 0.200). CONCLUSION: The referrals to a rheumatology institution were frequently initiated by general practitioners and internists functioning as general practitioners. In this context the presumptive diagnosis of general practitioners showed a low accordance with the final rheumatological diagnosis. In contrast, a detailed presumptive diagnosis is desirable for optimal use of the limited resources for rheumatological care.
BACKGROUND: The initial presentation of patients with symptoms indicative of a rheumatic disease is in most cases not directly to a rheumatologist. This study evaluated the following questions: I. Which medical specialists refer patients to a department of rheumatology? II. Evaluation of the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis by a rheumatologist. METHODS: A total of 947 patients (279 men and 668 women) who initially presented to a university hospital for rheumatological diagnostics were included in the study. The referring medical specialist fields were identified. Furthermore, a kappa analysis was performed to evaluate the accordance of the presumptive referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis generated after a rheumatological evaluation of the patients. RESULTS: Of the referrals 73% were initiated by general practitioners or internists functioning as general practitioners. The other referrers were 5% specialists in internal medicine (excluding rheumatology), 4% orthopedic/trauma surgeons, 1% other surgeons and 4% other specialist fields. A rheumatological diagnosis was made in 58% of the patients and rheumatological inflammatory joint diseases (26%), collagenosis (14%) and vasculitides (5%) were the most frequently diagnoses. The accordance of the presumptive diagnosis of the general practitioners and the final diagnosis after rheumatological evaluation was a kappa coefficient of κ = 0.304. Lower kappa values were evaluated for orthopedic surgeons (κ = 0.277) and other specialists (κ = 0.200). CONCLUSION: The referrals to a rheumatology institution were frequently initiated by general practitioners and internists functioning as general practitioners. In this context the presumptive diagnosis of general practitioners showed a low accordance with the final rheumatological diagnosis. In contrast, a detailed presumptive diagnosis is desirable for optimal use of the limited resources for rheumatological care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Accordance; Diagnosis; General practioner; Referrers; Rheumatic disease
Authors: A Lauter; K Triantafyllias; R Leiß; C Amberger; J Engels; M Hesse; M Jendro; J Gilly; M-L Stadelmann; W Ziese; D Wollschläger; M Dreher; B Pfeiff; J Weinmann-Menke; T Panholzer; A Schwarting Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Tobias Hoffmann; Peter Oelzner; Marcus Franz; Ulf Teichgräber; Diane Renz; Martin Förster; Joachim Böttcher; Claus Kroegel; P Christian Schulze; Gunter Wolf; Alexander Pfeil Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Tobias Hoffmann; Peter Oelzner; Martin Busch; Marcus Franz; Ulf Teichgräber; Claus Kroegel; Paul Christian Schulze; Gunter Wolf; Alexander Pfeil Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-29